Evasion of Toll-like receptor 2 activation by staphylococcal superantigen-like protein 3.

Toll-like receptors (TLRs) are crucial for our host defense against microbial infections. TLR2 is especially important to fight bacterial infections, as it specifically recognizes bacterial lipoproteins of both Gram-positive and Gram-negative origin. Present on a variety of immune cells, TLR2 is critical for host protection against several bacterial infections, including those caused by Staphylococcus aureus. This major human pathogen causes increasing health care problems due to its increased resistance to antibiotics. S. aureus secretes a wide variety of proteins that inhibit innate immune responses. Recently, several staphylococcal superantigen-like proteins (SSLs) have been described to mediate immune evasive properties. Here, we describe that SSL3 specifically binds and inhibits TLR2 activation on human and murine neutrophils and monocytes. Through binding of the extracellular TLR2 domain, SSL3 inhibits IL-8 production by HEK cells expressing TLR1/2 and TLR2/6 dimers, stimulated with their specific ligands. The SSL3-TLR2 interaction is partially glycan dependent as binding of SSL3 to TLR2 is affected upon removal of sialic acid residues. Moreover, the SSL3(R308A) mutant lacking glycan-binding properties shows lower TLR2 inhibition. An SSL3 mutant, lacking the N-terminal 126 amino acids, still retains full TLR2 inhibiting activity. Of other SSLs tested, only SSL4, which shares the highest homology with SSL3, blocks TLR2 activation. SSL3 is the first-described bacterial protein that blocks TLR2 activation through direct extracellular interaction with the receptor. This unique function of SSL3 adds to the arsenal of immune evasive molecules that S. aureus can employ to subvert both innate and adaptive immunity.

Roles of NapF, NapG and NapH, subunits of the Escherichia coli periplasmic nitrate reductase, in ubiquinol oxidation.

The nap operon of Escherichia coli K-12, encoding a periplasmic nitrate reductase (Nap), encodes seven proteins. The catalytic complex in the periplasm, NapA-NapB, is assumed to receive electrons from the quinol pool via the membrane-bound cytochrome NapC. Like NapA, B and C, a fourth polypeptide, NapD, is also essential for Nap activity. However, none of the remaining three polypeptides, NapF, G and H, which are predicted to encode non-haem, iron-sulphur proteins, are essential for Nap activity, and their function is currently unknown. The relative rates of growth and electron transfer from physiological substrates to Nap have been investigated using strains defective in the two membrane-bound nitrate reductases, and also defective in either ubiquinone or menaquinone biosynthesis. The data reveal that Nap is coupled more effectively to menaquinol oxidation than to ubiquinol oxidation. Conversely, parallel experiments with a second set of mutants revealed that nitrate reductase A couples more effectively with ubiquinol than with menaquinol. Three further sets of strains were constructed with combinations of in frame deletions of ubiCA, menBC, napC, napF and napGH genes. NapF, NapG and NapH were shown to play no role in electron transfer from menaquinol to the NapAB complex but, in the Ubi+Men- background, deletion of napF, napGH or napFGH all resulted in total loss of nitrate-dependent growth. Electron transfer from ubiquinol to NapAB was totally dependent upon NapGH, but not on NapF. NapC was essential for electron transfer from both ubiquinol and menaquinol to NapAB. The results clearly established that NapG and H, but not NapF, are essential for electron transfer from ubiquinol to NapAB. The decreased yield of biomass resulting from loss of NapF in a Ubi+Men+ strain implicates NapF in an energy- conserving role coupled to the oxidation of ubiquinol. We propose that NapG and H form an energy- conserving quinol dehydrogenase functioning as either components of a proton pump or in a Q cycle, as electrons are transferred from ubiquinol to NapC.