REVOLUMAB: A phase II trial of nivolumab in recurrent IDH mutant high-grade gliomas.

BACKGROUND: Novel effective treatments are needed for recurrent IDH mutant high-grade gliomas (IDHm HGGs). The aim of the multicentric, single-arm, phase II REVOLUMAB trial (NCT03925246) was to assess the efficacy and safety of the anti-PD1 Nivolumab in patients with recurrent IDHm HGGs. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Adult patients with IDHm WHO grade 3-4 gliomas recurring after radiotherapy and ≥ 1 line of alkylating chemotherapy were treated with intravenous Nivolumab until end of treatment (12 months), progression, unacceptable toxicity, or death. The primary endpoint was the 24-week progression-free survival rate (24w-PFS) according to RANO criteria. RESULTS: From July 2019 to June 2020, 39 patients with recurrent IDHm HGGs (twenty-one grade 3, thirteen grade 4, five grade 2 with radiological evidence of anaplastic transformation; 39% 1p/19q codeleted) were enrolled. Median time since diagnosis was 5.7 years, and the median number of previous systemic treatments was two. The 24w-PFS was 28.2% (11/39, CI95% 15-44.9%). Median PFS and OS were 1.84 (CI95% 1.81-5.89) and 14.7 months (CI95% 9.18-NR), respectively. Four patients (10.3%) achieved partial response according to RANO criteria. There were no significant differences in clinical or histomolecular features between responders and non-responders. The safety profile of Nivolumab was consistent with prior studies. CONCLUSIONS: We report the results of the first trial of immune checkpoint inhibitors in IDHm gliomas. Nivolumab failed to achieve its primary endpoint. However, treatment was well tolerated, and long-lasting responses were observed in a subset of patients, supporting further evaluation in combination with other agents (e.g. IDH inhibitors).

A Multicenter Randomized Bioequivalence Study of a Novel Ready-to-Use Temozolomide Oral Suspension vs. Temozolomide Capsules.

BACKGROUND: Temozolomide (TMZ) oral suspension (Ped-TMZ, KIZFIZO®) is being developed for the treatment of relapsed or refractory neuroblastoma, a rare cancer affecting infants and young children. The study assessed the safety and the bioequivalence of this novel pediatric formulation with existing TMZ oral capsules. METHODS: In vitro dissolution profiles and the bioequivalence were evaluated following the European Medicines Agency "Guidelines on the investigation of Bioequivalence". The phase I, multicenter, randomized, open-label, crossover, single-dose bioequivalence study enrolled 36 adult patients with glioblastoma multiforme or lower-grade glioma. Each patient received 200 mg/m2 Ped-TMZ suspension and TMZ capsules (Temodal®) on 2 consecutive days, with the order being randomly assigned. Fourteen blood samples were collected up to 10 h post-dosing. Bioequivalence was assessed by comparing the 90% confidence interval for the ratio of the geometric means of maximum TMZ plasma concentration (Cmax) and the area under the curve (AUCt). Other endpoints included further pharmacokinetic parameters and safety. RESULTS: Both formulations exhibited a fast in vitro dissolution profile with more than 85% of TMZ dissolved within 15 min. For the bioequivalence study, thirty patients completed the trial as per the protocol. The ratio of Ped-TMZ/TMZ capsule geometric means (90% CI) for AUCt and Cmax were 97.18% (95.05-99.35%) and 107.62% (98.07-118.09%), respectively, i.e., within the 80-125% bioequivalence limits. No buccal toxicity was associated with Ped-TMZ liquid formulation. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that Ped-TMZ oral suspension and TMZ oral capsule treatment are immediate release and bioequivalent medicines. There were also no unexpected safety signals or local toxicity (funded by ORPHELIA Pharma; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04467346).

Incidence and characteristics of pseudoprogression in IDH-mutant high-grade gliomas: A POLA network study.

BACKGROUND: Incidence and characteristics of pseudoprogression in isocitrate dehydrogenase-mutant high-grade gliomas (IDHmt HGG) remain to be specifically described. METHODS: We analyzed pseudoprogression characteristics and explored the possibility of pseudoprogression misdiagnosis in IDHmt HGG patients, treated with radiotherapy (RT) (with or without chemotherapy [CT]), included in the French POLA network. Pseudoprogression was analyzed in patients with MRI available for review (reference cohort, n = 200). Pseudoprogression misdiagnosis was estimated in this cohort and in an independent cohort (control cohort, n = 543) based on progression-free survival before and after first progression. RESULTS: In the reference cohort, 38 patients (19%) presented a pseudoprogression after a median time of 10.5 months after RT. Pseudoprogression characteristics were similar across IDHmt HGG subtypes. In most patients, it consisted of the appearance of one or several infracentimetric, asymptomatic, contrast-enhanced lesions occurring within 2 years after RT. The only factor associated with pseudoprogression occurrence was adjuvant PCV CT. Among patients considered as having a first true progression, 7 out of 41 (17%) in the reference cohort and 35 out of 203 (17%) in the control cohort were retrospectively suspected to have a misdiagnosed pseudoprogression. Patients with a misdiagnosed pseudoprogression were characterized by a time to event and an outcome similar to that of patients with a pseudoprogression but presented with larger and more symptomatic lesions. CONCLUSION: In patients with an IDHmt HGG, pseudoprogression occurs later than in IDH-wildtype glioblastomas and seems not only frequent but also frequently misdiagnosed. Within the first 2 years after RT, the possibility of a pseudoprogression should be carefully considered.

Characteristics, Patterns of Care and Predictive Geriatric Factors in Elderly Patients Treated for High-Grade IDH-Mutant Gliomas: A French POLA Network Study.

Background: Describe the characteristics, patterns of care, and predictive geriatric factors of elderly patients with IDHm high-grade glioma (HGG) included in the French POLA network. Material and Methods: The characteristics of elderly (≥70 years) patients IDHm HGG were compared to those of younger patients IDHm HGG (<70 years) and of elderly patients IDHwt HGG. Geriatric features were collected. Results: Out of 1433 HGG patients included, 119 (8.3%) were ≥70 years. Among them, 39 presented with IDHm HGG. The main characteristics of elderly IDHm HGG were different from those of elderly IDHwt HGG but similar to those of younger IDHm HGG. In contrast, their therapeutic management was different from those of younger IDHm HGG with less frequent gross total resection and radiotherapy. The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were longer for elderly patients IDHm HGG (29.3 months and 62.1 months) than elderly patients IDHwt HGG (8.3 months and 13.3 months) but shorter than those of younger patients IDHm HGG (69.1 months and not reached). Geriatric factors associated with PFS and OS were mobility, neuropsychological disorders, body mass index, and autonomy. Geriatric factors associated with PFS and OS were mobility, neuropsychological disorders, and body mass index, and autonomy. Conclusion: the outcome of IDHm HGG in elderly patients is better than that of IDHwt HGG. Geriatric assessment may be particularly important to optimally manage these patients.

Metronomic Cyclophosphamide With Cisplatin and Bevacizumab for Refractory Anaplastic Ependymoma: A Retrospective Study.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Anaplastic ependymoma is a rare cancer of the central nervous system. The treatment includes optimal resection with focal radiotherapy. Some case reports or retrospective studies have suggested efficacy of regimens containing platinum or bevacizumab. We describe the feasibility and clinical benefit of the cisplatin-bevacizumab-cyclophosphamide treatment of anaplastic ependymoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were identified through the Adolescent and Young Adults (AYAS) brain tumor national Web conference. We estimated the median progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: There were eight patients with anaplastic ependymoma, with a median age of 36 years. The median OS was 19.9 months and median PFS was 12.3 months. Three patients obtained partial response, four stable disease, and one patient had disease progression during induction. Six patients received maintenance with a median duration of 224 days. CONCLUSION: This study confirms the tolerance of bevacizumab-cyclophosphamide-cisplatin treatment of anaplastic ependymoma. The clinical benefit seems even superior to that described in the literature.

Characteristics of Anaplastic Oligodendrogliomas Short-Term Survivors: A POLA Network Study.

BACKGROUND: Anaplastic oligodendrogliomas IDH-mutant and 1p/19q codeleted (AO) occasionally have a poor outcome. Herein we aimed at analyzing their characteristics. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the characteristics of 44 AO patients with a cancer-specific survival <5 years (short-term survivors, STS) and compared them with those of 146 AO patients with a survival ≥5 years (classical survivors, CS) included in the POLA network. RESULTS: Compared to CS, STS were older (P = .0001), less frequently presented with isolated seizures (P < .0001), more frequently presented with cognitive dysfunction (P < .0001), had larger tumors (P = .= .003), a higher proliferative index (P = .= .0003), and a higher number of chromosomal arm abnormalities (P = .= .02). Regarding treatment, STS less frequently underwent a surgical resection than CS (P = .= .0001) and were more frequently treated with chemotherapy alone (P = .= .009) or with radiotherapy plus temozolomide (P = .= .05). Characteristics independently associated with STS in multivariate analysis were cognitive dysfunction, a number of mitosis > 8, and the absence of tumor resection. Based on cognitive dysfunction, type of surgery, and number of mitosis, patients could be classified into groups of standard (18%) and high (62%) risk of <5 year survival. CONCLUSION: The present study suggests that although STS poor outcome appears to largely result from a more advanced disease at diagnosis, surgical resection may be particularly important in this population.

Trabectedin for recurrent WHO grade 2 or 3 meningioma: A randomized phase II study of the EORTC Brain Tumor Group (EORTC-1320-BTG).

BACKGROUND: No systemic treatment has been established for meningioma progressing after local therapies. METHODS: This randomized, multicenter, open-label, phase II study included adult patients with recurrent WHO grade 2 or 3 meningioma. Patients were 2:1 randomly assigned to intravenous trabectedin (1.5 mg/m2 every 3 weeks) or local standard of care (LOC). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints comprised overall survival (OS), objective radiological response, safety, quality of life (QoL) assessment using the QLQ-C30 and QLQ-BN20 questionnaires, and we performed tissue-based exploratory molecular analyses. RESULTS: Ninety patients were randomized (n = 29 in LOC, n = 61 in trabectedin arm). With 71 events, median PFS was 4.17 months in the LOC and 2.43 months in the trabectedin arm (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.42; 80% CI, 1.00-2.03; P = .294) with a PFS-6 rate of 29.1% (95% CI, 11.9%-48.8%) and 21.1% (95% CI, 11.3%-32.9%), respectively. Median OS was 10.61 months in the LOC and 11.37 months in the trabectedin arm (HR = 0.98; 95% CI, 0.54-1.76; P = .94). Grade ≥3 adverse events occurred in 44.4% of patients in the LOC and 59% of patients in the trabectedin arm. Enrolled patients had impeded global QoL and overall functionality and high fatigue before initiation of systemic therapy. DNA methylation class, performance status, presence of a relevant co-morbidity, steroid use, and right hemisphere involvement at baseline were independently associated with OS. CONCLUSIONS: Trabectedin did not improve PFS and OS and was associated with higher toxicity than LOC treatment in patients with non-benign meningioma. Tumor DNA methylation class is an independent prognostic factor for OS.

Multimodal management of surgery- and radiation-refractory meningiomas: an analysis of the French national tumor board meeting on meningiomas cohort.

PURPOSE: Meningiomas represent the most frequent tumor of the central nervous system in adults. While most meningiomas are efficiently treated by surgery and radiotherapy/radiosurgery, there is a small portion of radiation- and surgery-refractory tumors for which there is no clear recommendation for optimal management. The French National Tumor Board Meeting on Meningiomas (NTBM) offers a glimpse on the current management of such patients. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the charts of patients presented to the multidisciplinary Meeting between 2016 and 2019. We selected patients with a progressive disease after at least two treatments, including surgery and radiotherapy. RESULTS: In this multicentric cohort of 86 cases, patients harbored 17 (19.8%) WHO Grade I, 48 (55.8%) WHO Grade II and 21 (24.4%) WHO Grade III tumors. The median number of treatments received before inclusion was 3 (range: 2 - 11). Following the Board Meeting, 32 patients (37.2%) received chemotherapy, 11 (12.8%) surgery, 17 (19.8%) radiotherapy, 14 (16.3%) watchful observation and 12 (13.9%) palliative care. After a mean follow-up of 13 months post-inclusion, 32 patients (37.2%) had died from their disease. The mean progression free survival was 27 months after radiotherapy, 10 months after surgery, 8.5 months after chemotherapy (Bevacizumab: 9 months - Octreotide/Everolimus: 8 months). CONCLUSIONS: Surgery- and radiation-refractory meningiomas represent a heterogeneous group of tumors with a majority of WHO Grade II cases. If re-irradiation and redo-surgery are not possible, bevacizumab and octreotide-everolimus appear as a valuable option in heavily pre-treated patients considering the current EANO guidelines.

Interval between planning and frameless stereotactic radiosurgery for brain metastases: are our margins still accurate?

BACKGROUND: Advances in intracranial stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) have led to dramatically reduced planning target volume (PTV) margins. However, tumor growth between planning and treatment may lead to treatment failure. Our purpose was to assess the kinetics of tumor growth before SRS for brain metastases. METHODS: This retrospective, monocentric study included all consecutive patients (pts) treated for brain metastases secondary to melanoma (ML) and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) between June 2015 and May 2016. All pts underwent diagnostic brain imaging and a radiosurgery planning MRI, during which gross tumor volume (GTV) was delineated. Linear and exponential models were used to extrapolate a theoretical GTV at first day of treatment, and theoretical time to outgrow the PTV margins. RESULTS: Twenty-three ML and 31 NSCLC brain metastases (42 pts, 84 brain imaging scans) were analyzed. Comparison of GTV at diagnosis and planning showed increased tumor volume for 20 ML pts (96%) and 22 NSCLC pts (71%). The shortest time to outgrow a 1 mm margin was 6 days and 3 days for ML and 14 and 8 days for NSCLC with linear and exponential models, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Physicians should bear in mind the interval between SRS planning and treatment. A mathematical model could screen rapidly progressing tumors.

Rechallenge with bevacizumab in patients with glioblastoma progressing off therapy.

Rechallenge with temozolomide has been shown to be a valid option in selected patients with progressive glioblastoma. Herein, we assessed the efficacy of rechallenge with bevacizumab in glioblastoma patients progressing off therapy. We retrospectively identified and analyzed the characteristics of patients with glioblastoma rechallenged with a bevacizumab-based chemotherapy regimen after having received bevacizumab as first-line treatment in association with temozolomide radiochemotherapy or at recurrence in association with temozolomide, CCNU or irinotecan. Twenty-five patients were identified. In all included patients, the first bevacizumab treatment resulted in an objective response and was discontinued for reasons other than disease progression (adverse event n = 9, physician or patient decision n = 16). Median duration of first bevacizumab treatment was 6 months (range: 2-58 months). None of the patients presented a rebound effect after bevacizumab discontinuation. The median interval between discontinuation of first bevacizumab treatment and bevacizumab rechallenge was 8.9 months (range: 2-58 months). At this time, bevacizumab was given in association with lomustine (n = 17), temozolomide (n = 6), irinotecan (n = 1), or alone (n = 1). Bevacizumab rechallenge resulted in an objective response in 15 patients (60%). Median progression-free survival was 6.7 months and overall survival was 9.6 months after bevacizumab rechallenge. Timing of first bevacizumab treatment (as first-line treatment or at recurrence) was not associated with the duration of response after treatment rechallenge. In the present series, patients who responded to bevacizumab and in whom this treatment was discontinued in the absence of tumor progression seemed to benefit from rechallenge with a bevacizumab-based chemotherapy regimen.