[Imaging-based patient selection for mechanical thrombectomy based on time since symptom onset]. / Welche Bildgebung zur Patientenauswahl für Thrombektomie in welchem Zeitfenster?

BACKGROUND: In ischemic stroke due to large vessel occlusion (LVO), the indications for patient selection for endovascular mechanical thrombectomy (MT) are based on findings from brain imaging. Several imaging protocols from computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are available to guide treatment decisions. OBJECTIVE: To recommend the optimal choice of imaging modalities and protocols for MT with respect to time windows from symptom onset. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Evaluation of the results of large randomized placebo-controlled trials regarding imaging-based patient selection in MT categorized by time intervals since symptom onset. We discuss methodological aspects, advantages and caveats of individual stroke imaging protocols. Summary of recommendations for the practice. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: In MT trials CT was mostly used for patient selection. Plain CT combined with CT angiography or additional perfusion imaging is the preferred option. In early time windows CT with CTA is adequate (≤ 6 h for MT, ≤ 4.5 h in cases of accompanying thrombolysis according to exclusion criteria). In later or unknown time windows perfusion imaging is needed for patient selection. Patients presenting with unknown time windows should be examined by MRI as a first-line choice in mild to moderate deficits, in cases of severe deficits CT imaging with perfusion imaging.

Incomplete or failed thrombectomy in acute stroke patients with Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomography Score 0-5 - how harmful is trying?

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: It is currently unknown whether mechanical thrombectomy (MT) for ischaemic stroke patients with low initial Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomography Score (ASPECTS) is clinically beneficial or even harmful. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether failed or incomplete MT in acute large vessel occlusion stroke with an initial ASPECTS ≤ 5 is associated with worse clinical outcome compared to patients not undergoing MT. METHODS: This observational cohort study included a consecutive sample of patients with anterior circulation stroke and initial ASPECTS ≤ 5 admitted between March 2015 and August 2019. Failed recanalization was defined as Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction (TICI) score 0-2a, and incomplete recanalization as TICI 2b. Clinical outcome was assessed using the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at 90 days defining very poor clinical outcome as mRS > 4. RESULTS: One hundred and seventy patients were included. Ninety-nine patients underwent MT and 71 patients received best medical treatment only. Clinical outcome after failed or incomplete MT (TICI 0-2b) was significantly better compared to patients with medical treatment only (median mRS 5, interquartile range 4-6 vs 5-6, P = 0.03). In multivariable logistic regression analysis, failed or incomplete MT (TICI 0-2b) showed a significantly reduced likelihood for very poor outcome (odds ratio 0.39, 95% confidence interval 0.19-0.83, P = 0.01). Failed MT (TICI 0-2a) was not associated with a worse outcome compared to best medical treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with failed or incomplete recanalization results (TICI 0-2b) showed a reduced likelihood for very poor outcome compared with those who did not receive MT. Evidence from randomized trials is needed to confirm that even failed or incomplete MT is not harmful in these patients.

Effect of intravenous alteplase on ischaemic lesion water homeostasis.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Intravenous (IV) lysis with alteplase is known to increase biomarkers of blood-brain barrier breakdown and has therefore been associated with secondary injuries such as hemorrhagic transformation. The impact of alteplase on brain edema formation, however, has not been investigated yet. The purpose was to examine the effects of IV alteplase on ischaemic lesion water homeostasis differentiated from final tissue infarct in patients with and without successful endovascular therapy (sET). METHODS: In all, 232 middle cerebral artery stroke patients were analyzed. 147 patients received IV alteplase, of whom 106 patients received subsequent sET. Out of 85 patients without IV alteplase, 50 received sET. Ischaemic brain edema was quantified at admission and follow-up computed tomography using quantitative lesion net water uptake (NWU) and its difference was calculated (ΔNWU). The relationship of alteplase on ΔNWU and edema-corrected final infarct volume was analyzed using univariate and multivariate linear regression models. RESULTS: The mean ΔNWU was 11.8% (SD 7.9) in patients with alteplase and 11.5% (SD 8.3) in patients without alteplase (P = 0.8). Alteplase was not associated with lowered ΔNWU whilst being associated with reduced edema-corrected tissue infarct volume [-27.4 ml, 95% confidence interval (CI) -49.4 to -5.4 ml; P = 0.02], adjusted for the Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomography Score and recanalization status. In patients with sET, ΔNWU was 10.5% (95% CI 6.3%-10.5%) for patients with IV alteplase and 8.4% (95% CI 9.1%-12.0%) for patients without IV alteplase. CONCLUSION: The application of IV alteplase did not significantly alter ischaemic lesion water homeostasis but was associated with reduced edema-corrected tissue infarct volume, which might be directly linked to improved functional outcome.

Emergency Conversion to General Anesthesia Is a Tolerable Risk in Patients Undergoing Mechanical Thrombectomy.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke is performed with the patient under local anesthesia, conscious sedation, or general anesthesia. According to recent trials, up to 16% of patients require emergency conversion to general anesthesia during mechanical thrombectomy. This study investigated the procedural and clinical outcomes after emergency conversion in comparison with local anesthesia, conscious sedation, and general anesthesia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study included 254 patients undergoing mechanical thrombectomy for acute large-vessel occlusion. The procedure was started with the patient either under local anesthesia, conscious sedation, or general anesthesia. Emergency conversion was defined as induction of general anesthesia during mechanical thrombectomy. The primary outcomes were successful reperfusion (TICI 2b/3) and functional independence (mRS at 90 days, ≤2). RESULTS: Twenty-five patients (9.8%) required emergency conversion to general anesthesia. The time from admission to flow restoration was increased under general anesthesia (median, 137 minutes) and emergency conversion (median, 138 minutes) compared with local anesthesia (median 110 minutes). After adjustment for confounders, emergency conversion to general anesthesia and primary general anesthesia had comparable chances of successful reperfusion (OR = 1.28; 95% CI, 0.31-5.25). Patients with emergency conversion had a tendency toward higher chances of functional independence (OR = 4.48; 95% CI, 0.49-40.86) compared with primary general anesthesia, but not compared with local anesthesia (OR = 0.86; 95% CI, 0.14-5.11) and conscious sedation (OR = 1.07; 95% CI, 0.17-6.53). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with emergency conversion did not have lower chances of successful reperfusion or functional independence compared those with primary general anesthesia, and time to flow restoration was also similar. We found no evidence supporting the primary induction of general anesthesia in patients at risk for emergency conversion.