Faculty perspectives of an entrustable professional activity (EPA) framework in predoctoral dental education.

PURPOSE: The entrustable professional activity (EPA) framework is an assessment approach used to define the educational outcomes of a program by outlining discrete work tasks learners are expected to perform independently upon graduation. This study outlines the development and evaluation of an EPA framework for predoctoral dental education at the University of North Carolina Adams School of Dentistry. METHODS: The draft EPA framework was created in collaboration with a group of faculty members and included 15 statements that were mapped to relevant Commission on Dental Accreditation standards. The draft EPA framework was distributed to faculty via an electronic survey, requesting participants to evaluate whether the EPAs were well-defined; observable; measurable; expected of a general dentist; transferable to other practice settings; and required application of relevant knowledge, skills, and attitudes. In addition, participants were asked to identify the percentage of graduates who could perform these tasks independently and whether learners must be able to perform the list of EPAs upon graduation. RESULTS: Sixty-eight faculty members completed the survey (72% response rate); participants represented all divisions across the school and had extensive dental practice experiences. Overall, participants agreed the EPAs met the defined criteria and were considered important for graduates to be able to demonstrate. Feedback from faculty voiced support for the EPA framework and identified concerns regarding the implementation due to potential faculty calibration and time constraints. CONCLUSION: Evidence from this study supports additional research to explore how the EPA framework can be further developed in predoctoral and postgraduate dental education programs.

Bitewing radiography dosimetry of a stationary intraoral tomosynthesis imaging system.

OBJECTIVES: This study assessed effective doses (E) from conventional and stationary intraoral tomosynthesis (s-IOT) radiography for posterior bitewing (PBW) examinations and evaluated the effect of sensor attenuation. STUDY DESIGN: An adult human tissue-equivalent phantom and optically stimulated luminescent dosimeters were used. Series of 4 PBW radiographs were acquired with circular and rectangular collimation. s-IOT PBW radiographs were acquired with built-in rectangular collimation. Radiographs were acquired without and with a sensor in the beam path. RESULTS: E (in µSv) was 15.7 and 8.2 for conventional-circular, 4.6 and 1.1 for conventional-rectangular, and 11.9 and 5.9 for s-IOT in sensor-absent and sensor-present scenarios, respectively. For sensor-absent exposures, E for conventional-rectangular was 29.3% and E for s-IOT was 75.8% of the conventional-circular dose. With the sensor present, these values were 13.4% and 72.0%, respectively (P < .001). Sensor-present E was lower than sensor-absent E for all modalities (P < .001). Reductions in equivalent doses were similar to effective dose reductions. CONCLUSIONS: For PBW examinations, E for s-IOT was smaller than for conventional radiography with circular collimation, but larger than for conventional radiography with rectangular collimation. The presence of a sensor maintained these differences but reduced E for all modalities.

The role of stationary intraoral tomosynthesis in reducing proximal overlap in bitewing radiography.

OBJECTIVES: This study examined the utility of stationary intraoral tomosynthesis (s-IOT) in opening proximal contacts in bitewing radiography. METHODS: 11 DENTSPLY Rinn Dental X-ray Teaching and Training Replica mannequins (Model #546002, Elgin, Ill) were imaged with a prototype s-IOT device (Surround Medical Systems, Morrisville, NC) and standard bitewing (SBW) technique. Premolar and molar bitewings were acquired with each system. Image receptor holders were used to position receptors and aid in the alignment of the position indicating devices. An expert operator (having more than 5 years of experience in intraoral radiography) acquired the images with the s-IOT prototype and standard intraoral X-ray devices. Images were assessed to analyze percentage overlap of the proximal surfaces using the tools available in ImageJ (NIH, Bethesda Maryland). RESULTS: 253-paired surfaces were included in the analysis. The difference in overlap was statistically significant with standard bitewing (SBW) images resulting in a median overlap of 13%, a minimum of 0%, a maximum of 100% and an interquartile range of 40%. s-IOT resulted in a median overlap of 1%, a minimum of 0%, a maximum of 37% and an interquartile range of 0%. The s-IOT prototype substantially reduced proximal surface overlap compared to conventional bitewing radiography. CONCLUSIONS: The use of s-IOT reduced proximal contact overlap compared to standard bitewing radiography for an experienced radiographer. Stationary intraoral tomosynthesis may be a potential alternative to SBW radiography, reducing the number of retakes due to closed contacts.