Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Virchows Arch ; 454(5): 519-24, 2009 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19381686

ABSTRACT

BRCA1-associated breast cancer frequently presents with estrogen-receptor (ERalpha) and progesterone-receptor (PR) negativity, grade 3, and early onset. In contrast, in BRCA1-deficient mice, ERalpha is highly expressed in early tumorigenesis. In a retrospective cohort study on 587 breast cancer patients with deleterious BRCA1 mutations, the correlation of ER, PR status, grading, age of onset, and tumor size was investigated. ERalpha and PR expression decreased from 62% in ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) to 20% and 16% in pT3, respectively (p value for ER 0.025 and PR 0.035, Fisher's exact test). The percentage of grade 1/2 tumors decreased from 44% in DCIS to 17% in pT3 (p value 0.074). Moreover, ER/PR positivity increased with increasing age. Our data suggest that early stage BRCA1-associated breast cancers are more frequently ERalpha and PR positive and low grade than advanced stages.


Subject(s)
BRCA1 Protein/genetics , Breast Neoplasms/genetics , Breast Neoplasms/metabolism , Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating/genetics , Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating/metabolism , Estrogen Receptor alpha/metabolism , Mutation , Receptors, Progesterone/metabolism , Adult , Age of Onset , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating/pathology , Female , Humans , Immunohistochemistry , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Young Adult
2.
Breast Cancer Res ; 7(5): R775-9, 2005.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16168123

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Unclassified variants (UVs) of unknown clinical significance are frequently detected in the BRCA2 gene. In this study, we have investigated the potential pathogenic relevance of the recurrent UV S384F (BRCA2, exon 10). METHODS: For co-segregation, four women from a large kindred (BN326) suffering from breast cancer were analysed. Moreover, paraffin-embedded tumours from two patients were analysed for loss of heterozygosity. Co-occurrence of the variant with a deleterious mutation was further determined in a large data set of 43,029 index cases. Nature and position of the UV and conservation among species were evaluated. RESULTS: We identified the unclassified variant S384F in three of the four breast cancer patients (the three were diagnosed at 41, 43 and 57 years of age). One woman with bilateral breast cancer (diagnosed at ages 32 and 50) did not carry the variant. Both tumours were heterozygous for the S384F variant, so loss of the wild-type allele could be excluded. Ser384 is not located in a region of functional importance and cross-species sequence comparison revealed incomplete conservation in the human, dog, rodent and chicken BRCA2 homologues. Overall, the variant was detected in 116 patients, five of which co-occurred with different deleterious mutations. The combined likelihood ratio of co-occurrence, co-segregation and loss of heterozygosity revealed a value of 1.4 x 10-8 in favour of neutrality of the variant. CONCLUSION: Our data provide conclusive evidence that the S384F variant is not a disease causing mutation.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/genetics , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Genetic Variation , Germ-Line Mutation , Loss of Heterozygosity , Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide , Adult , Amino Acid Substitution , Chromosome Segregation , DNA, Neoplasm/genetics , Female , Functional Laterality , Humans , Middle Aged
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...