The effect of inhaled nitric oxide on maximal oxygen consumption during exercise in acute hypoxia: a randomized double-blind crossover trial.

In moderate hypoxia [partial pressure of inspired oxygen ([Formula: see text]) = 85-111 mmHg], the reduction in maximal oxygen consumption (V̇o2max) has been attributed to arterial desaturation, whereas in severe hypoxia ([Formula: see text] < 85 mmHg), elevated pulmonary artery pressure (PAP) is thought to impair peak cardiac output ([Formula: see text]) and therefore V̇o2max. The purpose of this study was to examine whether reducing PAP with inhaled nitric oxide (iNO, a selective pulmonary vasodilator) would increase V̇o2max in moderate and severe acute hypoxia. Twelve young, healthy participants (mean V̇o2max = 45.3 ± 12.2 mL/kg/min), with normal lung function completed the randomized double-blind crossover study over six sessions. Experimental cardiopulmonary exercise tests (CPET) were completed on separate days with participants under the following conditions: 1) acute moderate hypoxia ([Formula: see text] = 89 mmHg), 2) acute severe hypoxia ([Formula: see text] = 79 mmHg), 3) acute moderate hypoxia with 40 ppm iNO, and 4) acute severe hypoxia with 40 ppm iNO (order randomized). On separate days, rest, and exercise (60 W), echocardiography was conducted to determine right ventricular systolic pressure (RVSP/PAP) under conditions 1-4. Resting RVSP was reduced by 2.5 ± 0.8 mmHg with iNO in moderate hypoxia (P = 0.01) and 1.8 ± 0.2 mmHg in severe hypoxia (P = 0.05); however, iNO had no effect on peak [Formula: see text] or V̇o2max in either hypoxic condition. Despite reducing RVSP with iNO in hypoxia, peak [Formula: see text] and V̇o2max were unaffected, suggesting that iNO may not improve exercise tolerance in healthy participants during hypoxic exercise.NEW & NOTEWORTHY The elevation of pulmonary artery pressure (PAP) with hypoxia may impair peak cardiac output ([Formula: see text]) and therefore V̇o2max. Our novel findings show that despite reducing resting RVSP in acute moderate ([Formula: see text] = 89 mmHg) and severe hypoxia ([Formula: see text] = 79 mmHg) with inspired nitric oxide, peak [Formula: see text], and V̇o2max were unaffected.

Reduced tidal volume-inflection point and elevated operating lung volumes during exercise in females with well-controlled asthma.

INTRODUCTION: Individuals with asthma breathe at higher operating lung volumes during exercise compared with healthy individuals, which contributes to increased exertional dyspnoea. In health, females are more likely to develop exertional dyspnoea than males at a given workload or ventilation, and therefore, it is possible that females with asthma may develop disproportional dyspnoea on exertion. The purpose of this study was to compare operating lung volume and dyspnoea responses during exercise in females with and without asthma. METHODS: Sixteen female controls and 16 females with asthma were recruited for the study along with 16 male controls and 16 males with asthma as a comparison group. Asthma was confirmed using American Thoracic Society criteria. Participants completed a cycle ergometry cardiopulmonary exercise test to volitional exhaustion. Inspiratory capacity manoeuvres were performed to estimate inspiratory reserve volume (IRV) and dyspnoea was evaluated using the Modified Borg Scale. RESULTS: Females with asthma exhibited elevated dyspnoea during submaximal exercise compared with female controls (p<0.05). Females with asthma obtained a similar IRV and dyspnoea at peak exercise compared with healthy females despite lower ventilatory demand, suggesting mechanical constraint to tidal volume (VT) expansion. VT-inflection point was observed at significantly lower ventilation and V̇O2 in females with asthma compared with female controls. Forced expired volume in 1 s was significantly associated with VT-inflection point in females with asthma (R2=0.401; p<0.01) but not female controls (R2=0.002; p=0.88). CONCLUSION: These results suggest that females with asthma are more prone to experience exertional dyspnoea, secondary to dynamic mechanical constraints during submaximal exercise when compared with females without asthma.

Impact of airway challenges on cardiovascular risk in asthma - a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: People experiencing asthma exacerbations are at increased risk of cardiovascular events. To better understand the relationship between asthma exacerbations and cardiovascular risk, this randomized case-control, cross-over controlled trial assessed the immediate systemic inflammatory and vascular responses to acutely induced pulmonary inflammation and bronchoconstriction in people with asthma and controls. METHODS: Twenty-six people with asthma and 25 controls underwent three airway challenges (placebo, mannitol, and methacholine) in random order. Markers of cardiovascular risk, including serum C-reactive protein, interleukin-6, and tumor necrosis factor, endothelial function (flow-mediated dilation), microvascular function (blood-flow following reactive hyperemia), and arterial stiffness (pulse wave velocity) were evaluated at baseline and within one hour following each challenge. The systemic responses in a) asthma/control and b) positive airway challenges were analyzed. (ClinicalTrials.gov reg# NCT02630511). RESULTS: Both the mannitol and methacholine challenges resulted in clinically significant reductions in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) in asthma (-7.6% and -17.9%, respectively). Following positive challenges, reduction in FEV1 was -27.6% for methacholine and -14.2% for mannitol. No meaningful differences in predictors of cardiovascular risk were observed between airway challenges regardless of bronchoconstrictor response. CONCLUSION: Neither acutely induced bronchoconstriction nor pulmonary inflammation and bronchoconstriction resulted in meaningful changes in systemic inflammatory or vascular function. These findings question whether the increased cardiovascular risk associated with asthma exacerbations is secondary to acute bronchoconstriction or inflammation, and suggest that other factors need to be further evaluated such as the cardiovascular impacts of short-acting inhaled beta-agonists.

Examining changes in vascular function, arterial stiffness and systemic inflammation during hospitalization and recovery from an acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

An acute exacerbation of COPD (AECOPD) is associated with increased risk of cardiovascular (CV) events. The elevated risk during an AECOPD may be related to changes in vascular function, arterial stiffness, and systemic inflammation; the time course of these measures and their corresponding recovery are poorly understood. Further, physical activity is reduced during an AECOPD, and physical activity may influence the cardiovascular responses to an AECOPD. The purpose of the study was to examine the acute impact of an AECOPD requiring hospitalization on vascular function, arterial stiffness, and systemic inflammation and examine whether physical activity modulates these variables during recovery. Patients hospitalized for an AECOPD were prospectively recruited and compared to control patients with stable COPD. Vascular function, arterial stiffness, and systemic inflammation (CRP, IL-6) were measured at hospital admission, hospital discharge and within 14 days of discharge. Physical activity was electronically tracked daily while in hospital and for 7 days following discharge using a Fitbit. One hundred and twenty-one patients with an AECOPD requiring hospitalization and 33 control patients with stable COPD were enrolled in the study. Vascular function was significantly lower, and systemic inflammation higher at hospital admission in patients with an AECOPD compared to stable COPD. Significant improvements in vascular function and inflammation were observed within 14 days of hospital discharge; however, vascular function remained lower than stable COPD. Physical activity was low at admission and increased following discharge; however, physical activity was unrelated to measures of vascular function or inflammation at any time point. An AECOPD requiring hospitalization is associated with impaired vascular function that persists during recovery. These findings provide a mechanistic link to help explain the enduring increase in CV risk and mortality following a severe AECOPD event.Clinical trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov #NCT01949727; Registered: 09/20/2013.

A single breath of nitric oxide does not alter pulmonary perfusion pressure.

NEW FINDINGS: What is the central question of this study? Is the amount of inhaled nitric oxide (NO) used during a diffusing capacity for inhaled NO manoeuvre sufficient to reduce pulmonary artery systolic pressure (PASP)? What is the main finding and its importance? These findings suggest that a single breath of inhaled NO does not change PASP, and combined with previous correlational work, further validates the use of the diffusing capacity for NO manoeuvre as a technique to determine pulmonary capillary blood volume and membrane diffusing capacity. ABSTRACT: The measurement of diffusing capacity is an important pulmonary function test to evaluate gas exchange. Using both carbon monoxide and nitric oxide (NO), the diffusing capacity for nitric oxide (DL,NO ) technique allows for the partitioning of capillary blood volume and membrane diffusing capacity. However, inhaled NO is known to dilate pulmonary arterioles in both health and disease and therefore could alter the outcomes that the DL,NO technique aims to quantify. The purpose of the study was to determine if a DL,NO manoeuvre alters pulmonary perfusion pressure. Nine participants completed 12 simulated 10-s breath-hold DL,NO manoeuvres (n = 6 placebo inhalations and n = 6 with 40 ppm NO; order randomized) during which tricuspid regurgitant jet velocity was recorded continuously using Doppler ultrasound to estimate pulmonary artery systolic pressure (PASP) as a surrogate for pulmonary perfusion pressure. The PASP was not different between the placebo and NO conditions (P = 0.742). These data indicate that a single DL,NO manoeuvre does not alter PASP and therefore would not be expected to acutely alter pulmonary capillary blood volume or membrane diffusing capacity.

Persistent dyspnea after COVID-19 is not related to cardiopulmonary impairment; a cross-sectional study of persistently dyspneic COVID-19, non-dyspneic COVID-19 and controls.

Background: Up to 53% of individuals who had mild COVID-19 experience symptoms for >3-month following infection (Long-CoV). Dyspnea is reported in 60% of Long-CoV cases and may be secondary to impaired exercise capacity (VO2peak) as a result of pulmonary, pulmonary vascular, or cardiac insult. This study examined whether cardiopulmonary mechanisms could explain exertional dyspnea in Long-CoV. Methods: A cross-sectional study of participants with Long-CoV (n = 28, age 40 ± 11 years, 214 ± 85 days post-infection) and age- sex- and body mass index-matched COVID-19 naïve controls (Con, n = 24, age 41 ± 12 years) and participants fully recovered from COVID-19 (ns-CoV, n = 14, age 37 ± 9 years, 198 ± 89 days post-infection) was conducted. Participants self-reported symptoms and baseline dyspnea (modified Medical Research Council, mMRC, dyspnea grade), then underwent a comprehensive pulmonary function test, cardiopulmonary exercise test, exercise pulmonary diffusing capacity measurement, and rest and exercise echocardiography. Results: VO2peak, pulmonary function and cardiac/pulmonary vascular parameters were not impaired in Long- or ns-CoV compared to normative values (VO2peak: 106 ± 25 and 107 ± 25%predicted, respectively) and cardiopulmonary responses to exercise were otherwise normal. When Long-CoV were stratified by clinical dyspnea severity (mMRC = 0 vs mMRC≥1), there were no between-group differences in VO2peak. During submaximal exercise, dyspnea and ventilation were increased in the mMRC≥1 group, despite normal operating lung volumes, arterial saturation, diffusing capacity and indicators of pulmonary vascular pressures. Interpretation: Persistent dyspnea after COVID-19 was not associated with overt cardiopulmonary impairment or exercise intolerance. Interventions focusing on dyspnea management may be appropriate for Long-CoV patients who report dyspnea without cardiopulmonary impairment.

Systemic vascular health is compromised in both confirmed and unconfirmed asthma.

INTRODUCTION: Asthma is associated with increased risk of cardiovascular diseases. Despite many presenting with symptoms of asthma, asthma cannot always be confirmed by physiological assessment. It is thus far unknown if the heightened cardiovascular risk applies to this group. The purpose of this study was to examine markers of cardiovascular risk, including endothelial function, arterial stiffness, and systemic inflammation, in individuals with confirmed asthma, unconfirmed asthma, and healthy controls. As short-acting beta agonist (SABA) use is associated with increased cardiovascular risk, a secondary analysis was conducted to investigate the impact of regular SABA use on vascular outcomes. METHODS: Individuals with confirmed asthma (n = 26), unconfirmed asthma (n = 15), and healthy controls (n = 26) were recruited for this cross-sectional study. Asthma was confirmed by FEV1 reversibility, methacholine challenge, or exercise challenge. Endothelial function was assessed using flow-mediated dilation (FMD), arterial stiffness using pulse wave velocity (PWV), and systemic inflammation by C-reactive protein (CRP) levels. RESULTS: FMD was significantly lower in both asthma groups compared to controls (confirmed: 7.7 ± 3.6%, unconfirmed: 7.3 ± 3.5%, controls: 10.4 ± 3.6%, p = 0.02). No difference was found in PWV nor CRP. Asthma participants who used SABA had increased arterial stiffness compared to those without SABA (9.2 ± 2.7 m/s, 7.7 ± 1.1 m/s respectively, p = 0.03). No difference was seen in FMD or CRP between SABA groups. CONCLUSION: Individuals with a clinical history of asthma symptoms demonstrate vascular impairments regardless of physiological confirmation of disease. Regular SABA use increases arterial stiffness. Avoiding potentially inappropriate SABA use among people without physiologically confirmed asthma may thus be beneficial in curbing cardiovascular risk.

Inhaled nitric oxide does not improve maximal oxygen consumption in endurance trained and untrained healthy individuals.

PURPOSE: Previous work suggests that endurance-trained athletes have superior pulmonary vasculature function as compared to untrained individuals, which may contribute to their greater maximal oxygen uptake ([Formula: see text]O2max). Inhaled nitric oxide (iNO) reduces pulmonary vascular resistance in healthy individuals, which could translate into greater cardiac output and improved [Formula: see text]O2max, particularly in untrained individuals. The purpose of the study was to examine whether iNO improved [Formula: see text]O2max in endurance trained and untrained individuals. METHODS: Sixteen endurance-trained and sixteen untrained individuals with normal lung function completed this randomized double-blind cross-over study over four sessions. Experimental cardiopulmonary exercise tests were completed while breathing either normoxia (placebo) or 40 ppm of iNO, on separate days (order randomized). On an additional day, echocardiography was used to determine pulmonary artery systolic pressure at rest and during sub-maximal exercise (60 Watts) while participants breathed normoxia or iNO. RESULTS: Right ventricular systolic pressure was significantly reduced by iNO during exercise (Placebo: 34 ± 7 vs. iNO: 32 ± 7; p = 0.04). [Formula: see text]O2max was greater in the endurance trained group (Untrained: 3.1 ± 0.7 vs. Endurance: 4.3 ± 0.9 L min-1; p < 0.01), however, there was no effect of condition (p = 0.79) and no group by condition interaction (p = 0.68). Peak cardiac output was also unchanged by iNO in either group. CONCLUSION: Despite a reduction in right ventricular systolic pressure, the lack of change in [Formula: see text]O2max with iNO suggests that the pulmonary vasculature does not limit [Formula: see text]O2max in young healthy individuals, regardless of fitness level.

Ventilatory efficiency in athletes, asthma and obesity.

During submaximal exercise, minute ventilation (V' E) increases in proportion to metabolic rate (i.e. carbon dioxide production (V' CO2 )) to maintain arterial blood gas homeostasis. The ratio V' E/V' CO2 , commonly termed ventilatory efficiency, is a useful tool to evaluate exercise responses in healthy individuals and patients with chronic disease. Emerging research has shown abnormal ventilatory responses to exercise (either elevated or blunted V' E/V' CO2 ) in some chronic respiratory and cardiovascular conditions. This review will briefly provide an overview of the physiology of ventilatory efficiency, before describing the ventilatory responses to exercise in healthy trained endurance athletes, patients with asthma, and patients with obesity. During submaximal exercise, the V' E/V' CO2 response is generally normal in endurance-trained individuals, patients with asthma and patients with obesity. However, in endurance-trained individuals, asthmatics who demonstrate exercise induced-bronchoconstriction, and morbidly obese individuals, the V' E/V' CO2 can be blunted at maximal exercise, likely because of mechanical ventilatory constraint.

Inhaled nitric oxide improves ventilatory efficiency and exercise capacity in patients with mild COPD: A randomized-control cross-over trial.

KEY POINTS: Patients with mild chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) have an elevated ventilatory equivalent to CO2 production ( V̇E / V̇CO2 ) during exercise, secondary to increased dead space ventilation. The reason for the increased dead space is unclear, although pulmonary microvascular dysfunction and the corresponding capillary hypoperfusion is a potential mechanism. Despite emerging evidence that mild COPD is associated with pulmonary microvascular dysfunction, limited research has focused on experimentally modulating the pulmonary microvasculature during exercise in mild COPD. The present study sought to examine the effect of inhaled nitric oxide (iNO), a selective pulmonary vasodilator, on V̇E / V̇CO2 , dyspnoea and exercise capacity in patients with mild COPD. Experimental iNO increased peak oxygen uptake in mild COPD, secondary to reduced V̇E / V̇CO2 and dyspnoea. This is the first study to demonstrate that experimental manipulation of the pulmonary circulation alone, can positively impact dyspnoea and exercise capacity in mild COPD. ABSTRACT: Patients with mild chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) have an exaggerated ventilatory response to exercise, contributing to dyspnoea and exercise intolerance. Previous research in mild COPD has demonstrated an elevated ventilatory equivalent to CO2 production ( V̇E / V̇CO2 ) during exercise, secondary to increased dead space ventilation. The reason for the increased dead space is unclear, although pulmonary microvascular dysfunction and the corresponding capillary hypoperfusion is a potential mechanism. The present study tested the hypothesis that inhaled nitric oxide (iNO), a selective pulmonary vasodilator, would lower V̇E / V̇CO2 and dyspnoea, and improve exercise capacity in patients with mild COPD. In this multigroup randomized-control cross-over study, 15 patients with mild COPD (FEV1  =  89 ± 11% predicted) and 15 healthy controls completed symptom-limited cardiopulmonary exercise tests while breathing normoxic gas or 40 ppm iNO. Compared with placebo, iNO significantly increased peak oxygen uptake (1.80 ± 0.14 vs. 1.53 ± 0.10 L·min-1 , P < 0.001) in COPD, whereas no effect was observed in controls. At an equivalent work rate of 60 W, iNO reduced V̇E / V̇CO2 by 3.8 ± 4.2 units (P = 0.002) and dyspnoea by 1.1 ± 1.2 Borg units (P < 0.001) in COPD, whereas no effect was observed in controls. Operating lung volumes and oxygen saturation were unaffected by iNO in both groups. iNO increased peak oxygen uptake in COPD, secondary to reduced V̇E / V̇CO2 and dyspnoea. These data suggest that mild COPD patients demonstrate pulmonary microvascular dysfunction that contributes to increased V̇E / V̇CO2 , dyspnoea and exercise intolerance. This is the first study to demonstrate that experimental manipulation of the pulmonary circulation alone, can positively impact dyspnoea and exercise capacity in mild COPD.

The supine position improves but does not normalize the blunted pulmonary capillary blood volume response to exercise in mild COPD.

Patients with mild chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) demonstrate resting pulmonary vascular dysfunction as well as a blunted pulmonary diffusing capacity (DLCO) and pulmonary capillary blood volume (VC) response to exercise. The transition from the upright to supine position increases central blood volume and perfusion pressure, which may overcome microvascular dysfunction in an otherwise intact alveolar-capillary interface. The present study examined whether the supine position normalized DLCO and VC responses to exercise in mild COPD. Sixteen mild COPD participants and 13 age-, gender-, and height-matched controls completed DLCO maneuvers at rest and during exercise in the upright and supine position. The multiple FIO2-DLCO method was used to determine DLCO, VC, and membrane diffusion capacity (DM). All three variables were adjusted for alveolar volume (DLCOAdj, VCAdj, and DMAdj). The supine position reduced alveolar volume similarly in both groups, but oxygen consumption and cardiac output were unaffected. DLCOAdj, DMAdj, and VCAdj were all lower in COPD. These same variables all increased with upright and supine exercise in both groups. DLCOAdj was unaffected by the supine position. VCAdj increased in the supine position similarly in both groups. DMAdj was reduced in the supine position in both groups. While the supine position increased exercise VCAdj in COPD, the increase was of similar magnitude to healthy controls; therefore, exercise VC remained blunted in COPD. The persistent reduction in exercise DLCO and VC when supine suggests that pulmonary vascular destruction is a contributing factor to the blunted DLCO and VC response to exercise in mild COPD.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Patients with mild chronic obstructive pulmonary disease demonstrate a combination of reversible pulmonary microvascular dysfunction and irreversible pulmonary microvascular destruction.

Acute effects of salbutamol on systemic vascular function in people with asthma.

BACKGROUND: Asthmatics are at increased cardiovascular disease risk, which has been linked to beta2(ß2)-agonist use. Inhalation of ß2-agonists increases sympathetic nerve activity (SNA) in healthy individuals, however the systemic impact of salbutamol in asthmatics using ß2-agonists regularly is unknown. OBJECTIVES: This study compared the systemic vascular responses to a clinical dose of salbutamol (Phase I) and following an acute increase in SNA (Phase II) in asthmatics and controls. METHODS: Fourteen controls and 14 asthmatics were recruited for Phase I. On separate days, flow-mediated dilation (FMD) and peripheral arterial stiffness (pPWV) were evaluated at baseline and following either 400 µg inhaled salbutamol or a placebo inhaler. For Phase II, heart rate, blood pressure, vascular conductance, pPWV, and central (c)PWV were evaluated in response to a large increase in SNA brought on by cold-water hand immersion (i.e. cold-pressor test) or body-temperature water hand immersion (i.e. control) in 10 controls and 10 asthmatics. RESULTS: Following salbutamol, asthmatics demonstrated reduced FMD (-3.0%, p < 0.05) and increased pPWV (+0.7 m/s, p < 0.05); however, salbutamol had no effect in controls. The cold-pressor test resulted in similar increases in blood pressure, vascular flow rates and conductance, pPWV, and cPWV in both asthmatics and controls, suggesting similar neurovascular transduction in asthmatics and controls. CONCLUSION: Inhaled Salbutamol leads to increased arterial stiffness and reduced FMD in asthmatics. As asthmatics and controls had similar vascular responses to an increase in SNA, these findings suggest asthmatics have heightened sympathetic responses to ß2-agonists which may contribute to the increased cardiovascular risk in asthma.

Exertional dyspnea and operating lung volumes in asthma.

Dyspnea has been reported to be a main contributor to exercise avoidance in asthma. While traditional markers of ventilation do not explain the heightened dyspnea during exercise in patients with asthma, this study proposed that exertional dyspnea in asthma was due to high-operating lung volumes, which may be improved with a short-acting ß2-agonist. On two separate days, 16 patients with asthma and 16 controls completed a lung function test and incremental exercise tests to exhaustion. On one of the days (order randomized), 400 µg salbutamol was administered before exercise. Inspiratory capacity (IC), inspiratory reserve volume (IRV), and dyspnea (modified Borg scale) were evaluated throughout exercise. Compared with controls, patients with asthma reported greater dyspnea at the same absolute submaximal workloads. Furthermore, patients with asthma demonstrated altered breathing responses to exercise, characterized by reduced IC and IRV throughout exercise compared with controls. The reduced IRV was associated with increased dyspnea in patients with asthma. Salbutamol did not affect dyspnea or operating lung volumes in either group. The increased perception of dyspnea during incremental exercise in patients with asthma appears to be secondary to a reduction in IRV, which is unaffected by an inhaled ß2-agonist. NEW & NOTEWORTHY Increased exertional dyspnea in asthma appears to be due to high operating lung volumes and is not affected by salbutamol.