Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Biomech ; 161: 111833, 2023 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37845112

ABSTRACT

In surgical staff, low-back pain (LBP) is prevalent and prolonged trunk inclination is hypothesized to be one of its potential causes. The aim of this study was to evaluate the magnitude and duration of trunk inclination in the sagittal plane of surgical assistants during surgical procedures. The three-dimensional trunk orientation was measured in 91 surgical assistants across four medical facilities during surgical procedures using an inertial measurement unit on the thorax. Per participant, Exposure Variation Analysis was used to evaluate the percentage of the total time of trunk inclination (< -10° (backward inclination); -10-10° (upright posture); 10-20° (light inclination); 20-30° (moderate inclination); >30° (strong inclination)) taking into account posture duration (< 10 s; 10-60 s; 60-300 s; > 300 s). Participants reported their LBP history and perceived low-back load during the procedure via a questionnaire. Participants were in an upright posture for 75% [63-84%] (median [interquartile range]) of the total surgery time (average surgery time: 174 min). Trunk inclination was beyond 20° and 30° for 4.3% [2.1-8.7%] and 1.5% [0.5-3.2%] of the surgery time, respectively. In most of the participants, the duration of trunk inclination beyond 20° or 30° was less than 60 s. Questionnaire response rate was 81%. Persistent or repeated LBP was reported by 49% of respondents, and was unrelated to the exposure to inclined trunk postures. It is concluded that other factors than prolonged trunk inclination, for instance handling of loads or prolonged standing may be causally related to the reported LBP in the investigated population.


Subject(s)
Low Back Pain , Posture , Humans , Posture/physiology , Low Back Pain/etiology , Thorax/physiology , Standing Position , Range of Motion, Articular/physiology
2.
J Electromyogr Kinesiol ; 73: 102815, 2023 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37688848

ABSTRACT

This study investigated the effects of back muscle fatigue on the estimation of low-back loads and active low-back moments during lifting, using an EMG and kinematics based model calibrated with data from an unfatigued state. Fourteen participants performed lifting tasks in unfatigued and fatigued states. Fatigue was induced through semi-static forward bending. EMG, kinematics, and ground reaction forces were measured, and low-back loads were estimated using inverse dynamics and EMG-driven muscle model. A regression model was developed using data from a set of calibration lifts, and its accuracy was evaluated for unfatigued and fatigued lifts. During the fatigue-inducing task, the EMG amplitude increased by 2.8 %MVC, representing a 38% increase relative to the initial value. However, during the fatigued lifts, the peak EMG amplitude was found to be 1.6 %MVC higher than that observed during the unfatigued lifts, representing a mere 4% increase relative to the baseline unfatigued peak EMG amplitude. Kinematics and low-back load estimates remained unaffected. Regression model estimation errors remained unaffected for 5 kg lifts, but increased by no more than 5% of the peak active low-back moment for 15 kg lifts. We conclude that the regression-based estimation quality of active low-back moments can be maintained during periods of muscle fatigue, although errors may slightly increase for heavier loads.


Subject(s)
Back Muscles , Muscle Fatigue , Humans , Muscle Fatigue/physiology , Muscle, Skeletal/physiology , Lifting , Electromyography , Biomechanical Phenomena
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...