Communication training for general practitioners aimed at improving antibiotic prescribing: a controlled before-after study in multicultural Dutch cities.

Introduction: Suboptimal doctor-patient communication drives inappropriate prescribing of antibiotics. We evaluated a communication intervention for general practitioners (GPs) in multicultural Dutch cities to improve antibiotic prescribing for respiratory tract infections (RTI). Methods: This was a non-randomized controlled before-after study. The study period was pre-intervention November 2019 ­ April 2020 and post-intervention November 2021 ­ April 2022. The intervention consisted of a live training (organized between September and November 2021), an E-learning, and patient material on antibiotics and antibiotic resistance in multiple languages. The primary outcome was the absolute number of prescribed antibiotic courses indicated for RTIs per GP; the secondary outcome was all prescribed antibiotics per GP. We compared the post-intervention differences in the mean number of prescribed antibiotics between the intervention (N = 25) and the control group (N = 110) by using an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) test, while adjusting for the pre-intervention number of prescribed antibiotics. Additionally, intervention GPs rated the training and their knowledge and skills before the intervention and 3 months thereafter. Results: There was no statistically significant difference in the mean number of prescribed antibiotics for RTI between the intervention and the control group, nor for mean number of overall prescribed antibiotics. The intervention GPs rated the usefulness of the training for daily practice a 7.3 (on a scale from 1­10) and there was a statistically significant difference between pre- and post-intervention on four out of nine items related to knowledge and skills. Discussion: There was no change in GPs prescription behavior between the intervention and control group. However, GPs found the intervention useful and showed some improvement on self-rated knowledge and communication skills.

Providing antibiotics to immigrants: a qualitative study of general practitioners' and pharmacists' experiences.

BACKGROUND: If healthcare professionals perceive that patients strongly expect to be prescribed antibiotics, inappropriate prescriptions may result. As it is unknown whether this happens more often with certain patient groups, we explored whether general practitioners (GPs) and pharmacists perceived such expectations when they provided antibiotics to immigrant patients. METHODS: Ten GPs and five pharmacists from Rotterdam, the Netherlands, were interviewed on the basis of a semi-structured topic guide. Atlas.ti software was then used to conduct a thematic analysis. RESULTS: GPs felt that immigrant patients, especially those who had arrived recently, were more likely to expect to receive antibiotics than native Dutch patients. However, these expectations had decreased over the last years and did not always lead immigrants to exert pressure on them. Except for language barriers, the factors reported by GPs to influence their antibiotic prescribing behaviour were unrelated to patients' immigrant background. If there was a language barrier, GPs experienced greater diagnostic uncertainty and needed additional time to obtain and communicate correct information. To overcome language barriers, they often used point-of-care testing to convince patients that antibiotics were unnecessary. Although pharmacists rarely experienced problems dispensing antibiotics to immigrants, they and GPs both struggled to find effective ways of overcoming language barriers, and stressed the need for multi-language support materials. CONCLUSION: While pharmacists rarely experience any problems providing antibiotics to immigrants, GPs regularly face language barriers with immigrant patients, which complicate the diagnostic process and communicating information in the limited available time. This sometimes leads antibiotics to be prescribed inappropriately.

Reducing antibiotic prescribing by enhancing communication of general practitioners with their immigrant patients: protocol for a randomised controlled trial (PARCA study).

INTRODUCTION: Although antibiotic use and antimicrobial resistance in the Netherlands is comparatively low, inappropriate prescription of antibiotics is substantial, mainly for respiratory tract infections (RTIs). General practitioners (GPs) experience pressure from patients with an immigration background to prescribe antibiotics and have difficulty communicating in a culturally sensitive way. Multifaceted interventions including communication skills training for GPs are shown to be most effective in reducing antibiotic prescription. The PARCA study aims to reduce the number of antibiotic prescriptions for RTIs through implementing a culturally sensitive communication intervention for GPs and evaluate it in a randomised controlled trial (RCT). METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A non-blinded RCT including 58 GPs (29 for each arm). The intervention consists of: (1) An E-learning with 4 modules of 10-15 min each; (2) A face-to-face training session in (intercultural) communication skills including role plays with a training actor and (3) Availability of informative patient-facing materials that use simple words (A2/B1 level) in multiple languages. The primary outcome measure is the number of dispensed antibiotic courses qualifying for RTIs in primary care, per 1000 registered patients. The secondary outcome measure is the number of all dispensed antibiotic courses, per 1000 registered patients. The intervention arm will receive the training in Autumn 2021, followed by an observation period of 6 winter months for which numbers of antibiotics will be collected for both trial arms. The GPs/practices in the control arm can attend the training after the observation period. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study protocol was approved by the Medical Ethics Review Committee of Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam (MEC-2020-0142). The results of the trial will be published in international peer-reviewed scientific journals and will be disseminated through national and international congresses. The project is funded by The Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development (ZonMw). TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NL9450.

Evaluation of Sysmex XN-1000 High-Sensitive Analysis (hsA) Research Mode for Counting and Differentiating Cells in Cerebrospinal Fluid.

OBJECTIVES: Counting cells in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) using automated analyzers is generally problematic due to low precision at low cell numbers. To overcome this limitation, Sysmex (Kobe, Japan) developed the high-sensitive analysis (hsA) research mode specifically for counting cells in fluids that contain low cell counts. We evaluated this mode by counting RBCs, WBCs, and differentiated WBCs in CSF samples. METHODS: We analyzed 248 CSF samples using the hsA mode and compared these results with those obtained using the manual counting method. We also evaluated the linearity, detection limits, carryover, and precision of the hsA mode. RESULTS: Using the hsA mode, the lower limit of quantification for RBCs and WBCs was 10 and 2 cells/µL, respectively. Comparing the two methods revealed good agreement with respect to WBCs (y = 1.08x + 0.52), RBCs (y = 1.07x + 0.00), lymphocytes (y = 1.00x + 0.00), neutrophils (y = 1.05x + 0.00), and monocytes (y = 0.88x + 0.07). Regression analysis for samples containing low WBCs (<10 cells/µL) and low RBCs (<50 cells/µL) also had good agreement, although a slight positive bias was found for RBCs. Linearity was good (r(2) ≥ 0.99) for all parameters evaluated. Carryover was negligible and never exceeded 0.04%. CONCLUSIONS: The XN hsA research mode provides reliable cell counts in CSF samples, even in samples containing low numbers of WBCs and RBCs.

UF-1000i: validation of the body fluid mode for counting cells in body fluids.

BACKGROUND: We evaluated the new body fluid mode on the UF-1000i urinalysis analyzer for counting total white blood cells (WBC) and red blood cells (RBC) in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD), ascites and pleural fluids. METHODS: We collected 154 body fluid samples, and compared the results of the UF-1000i BF mode with the Fuchs-Rosenthal counting chamber and the XN-1000 BF mode. Linearity, carry over and precision were also assessed. RESULTS: Method comparison results showed acceptable WBC agreement between UF-1000i and chamber (y=1.27x+3.13, n=135, r=0.99) and between UF-1000i and XN (y=1.15x+0.31, n=135, r=1.00). Comparison between the UF-1000i and both comparison methods showed good agreement for RBC counts. Overall results were better when UF-1000i was compared with the XN-1000 than with the Fuchs-Rosenthal chamber. The lower limit of quantitation was defined at 9×106 WBC/L and at 25×106 RBC/L. Linearity for both WBC (r=1.00) and RBC (r=0.99) was good. Carry over was negligible, and it never exceeded 0.01%. In one sample, a high discrepancy was observed between WBC results for both automated analyzers and the counting chamber. This discrepancy was due to interfering factors, such as bacteria and yeast cells, and it led to a false increased WBC count on both automated systems. CONCLUSIONS: The UF-1000i BF mode offers rapid and reliable total WBC and RBC counts for initial screening of CAPD, ascites and pleural fluid, and can improve the workflow in a routine laboratory; however, when using automated analyzers, the inspection of scattergrams is required to ensure the most accurate results are obtained.

Immature granulocytes predict microbial infection and its adverse sequelae in the intensive care unit.

BACKGROUND: We evaluated the predictive value of immature granulocyte (IG) percentage in comparison with white blood cell counts (WBC) and C-reactive protein (CRP), for infection, its invasiveness, and severity in critically ill patients. METHODS: In 46 consecutive patients, blood samples were collected at the day (0) of a clinical suspicion of microbial infection and at days 1 and 3 thereafter. We defined infections, bloodstream infection, and septic shock within 7 days after enrollment. RESULTS: Of the 46 patients, 31 patients had infection, 15 patients developed bloodstream infection, and 13 patients septic shock. C-reactive protein and IG percentage increased with increasing invasiveness and severity of infection, from day 0 onwards. Receiver operating characteristic analysis to predict infection showed an area under the curve of 0.66 (P=.10) for WBC vs 0.74 (P=.01) for CRP and 0.73 (P=.02) for IG percentage on day 0. Comparing WBC and CRP to WBC and IG percentage results in comparable prediction of microbial infection. Comparing WBC and CRP with WBC, CRP, and IG percentage suggests an additional early value of IG percentage, when not elevated, in ruling out infection. CONCLUSION: Immature granulocyte percentage is a useful marker, as CRP, to predict infection, its invasiveness, and severity, in critically ill patients. However, the IG percentage adds to WBC and CRP in the early exclusion of infection and can be obtained routinely without extra blood sampling or costs.

Validation of the body fluid module on the new Sysmex XN-1000 for counting blood cells in cerebrospinal fluid and other body fluids.

BACKGROUND: We evaluated the body fluid (BF) module on the new Sysmex XN-1000 for counting blood cells. METHODS: One hundred and eighty-seven BF samples [73 cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), 48 continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD), 46 ascites, and 20 pleural fluid] were used for method comparison between the XN-1000 and manual microscopy (Fuchs-Rosenthal chamber and stained cytospin slides) for counting red blood cells (RBCs) and white blood cells (WBCs) (differential). RESULTS: Good agreement was found for counting WBCs (y=1.06x+0.09, n=67, R2=0.96) and mononuclear cells (MNs) (y=1.04x-0.01, n=40, R2=0.93) in CSF. However, the XN-1000 systematically counted more polymorphonuclear cells (PMNs) (y=1.48x+0.18, n=40, R2=0.99) compared to manual microscopy. Excellent correlation for RBCs >1×109/L (y=0.99x+116.56, n=26, R2=0.99) in CSF was found. For other fluids (CAPD, ascites and pleural fluid) excellent agreement was found for counting WBCs (y=1.06x+0.26, n=109, R2=0.98), MNs (y=1.06x-0.41, n=93, R2=0.96), PMNs (y=1.06x+0.81, n=93, R2=0.98) and RBCs (y=1.04x+110.04, n=43, R2=0.98). By using BF XN-check, the lower limit of quantitation (LLoQ) for WBC was defined at 5×106/L. Linearity was excellent for both the WBCs (R2=0.99) and RBCs (R2=0.99) and carry-over never exceeded 0.05%. CONCLUSIONS: The BF module on the XN-1000 is a suitable tool for fast and accurate quantification of WBC (differential) and RBC counts in CSF and other BFs in a diagnostic setting.

Evaluation of the new body fluid mode on the Sysmex XE-5000 for counting leukocytes and erythrocytes in cerebrospinal fluid and other body fluids.

BACKGROUND: We evaluated the body fluid (BF) mode on the new Sysmex XE-5000 analyzer. METHODS: Red (RBC) and white blood cell (WBC) (differential) counts of BFs (139 patient samples and 87 normal samples) were measured and compared to the Fuchs-Rosenthal chamber and stained cytospin slides. RESULTS: Extended cell counting using the BF mode was noted to have an improved WBC detection limit (CV(20)%) of 10 x 10(6)/L. Excellent agreement with the manual method was observed for most BFs [mean bias +2 to 6 x 10(6)/L for cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and -1 to 12 x 10(6)/L for other fluids]. In CSF, the BF-mode counted more WBC (polymorphic nuclear cells) compared with the manual method (mean bias +5 to 6 x 10(6)/L), especially in samples with low cell counts (<20 x 10(6)/L). Carry over was negligible (mostly <0.17%) and linearity was excellent (mean bias <5%). The reference ranges for CSF (n=87) were RBC 0 x 10(6)/L, WBC and mononuclear <7 x 10(6)/L, and polymorph nucleated cells <3 x 10(6)/L. CONCLUSIONS: The BF mode on the Sysmex XE-5000 offers rapid and accurate RBC and WBC (differential) counts in clinically relevant concentration ranges in CSF and other fluids. In addition, the exclusion of high fluorescent cells, such as mesothelial cells and macrophages from WBC counting may reduce the number of manual analyses in pleural fluids and ascites.

Automated analysis of pleural fluid total and differential leukocyte counts with the Sysmex XE-2100.

BACKGROUND: Determination of leukocyte (WBC) counts in pleural fluid is routinely performed by microscopic examination. In this study, we evaluated the performance of automated (differential) WBC counting in comparison with manual counting. METHODS: Pleural fluid samples (n=45) were obtained from patients undergoing diagnostic thoracocentesis. The manual total WBC count was determined after Samson staining in a Fuchs-Rosenthal hemocytometer; microscopic differential counts were performed on May-Grünwald Giemsa-stained cytospin slides. The Sysmex XE-2100 hematology analyzer was used for automated (differential) WBC counting. The functional detection limit was determined by serial dilution of continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) fluid and replicate measurements of each dilution. RESULTS: The automated WBC count (x10(6)/L) was highly correlated with that of the microscopic reference method (r(2)=0.95; WBC-analyzer=0.97 x WBC-reference method+16; n=45). Good agreement was also observed for the absolute lymphocyte count (r(2)=0.92; WBC-analyzer=0.99 x WBC-reference method+32; n=36), neutrophil count (r(2)=0.94; WBC-analyzer=0.91 x WBC-reference method+6; n=35), and monocyte count (r(2)=0.73; WBC-analyzer=0.83 x WBC-reference method+6; n=38). The functional detection limit for WBCs was calculated at 50 x 10(6)/L (coefficient of variation 20%). CONCLUSIONS: With some limitations, total and differential WBC counts in pleural fluid can be reliably determined using the Sysmex XE-2100 instrument.