Measuring Cannulation Skills for Hemodialysis: Objective Versus Subjective Assessment.

Lack of cannulation skill during hemodialysis treatments results in poor clinical outcomes due to infiltration and other cannulation-related trauma. Unfortunately, training of patient care technicians and nurses, specifically on the "technical" aspects of cannulation, has traditionally not received much attention. Simulators have been successfully deployed in many medical specialties for assessment and training of clinical skills. However, simulators have not been as widely used in nursing, especially in the context of training clinical personnel in the dialysis unit. We designed a state-of-the-art simulator for quantifying skill for hemodialysis cannulation. In this study, 52 nurses and patient care technicians with varying levels of clinical experience performed 16 cannulations on the simulator with different fistula properties. We formulated a composite metric for objectively measuring overall success of cannulation and compared this metric with subjective assessment by experts. In addition, we examined if years of clinical experience correlated with objective and subjective scores for cannulation skill. Results indicated that, while subjective and objective metrics generally correlated with each other, the objective metric was more precise and better suited for quantifying cannulation skill. Further, the simulator-based objective metric provides several advantages over subjective ratings, including providing fine-grained assessment of skill, consistency in measurement unaffected by subjective biases, and basing assessment on a more complete evaluation of performance. Years of clinical experience, however, demonstrated little correlation with either method of skill assessment. The methods presented for cannulation skill assessment in this study, if widely applied, could result in improved cannulation skill among our PCTs and nurses, which could positively impact patient outcomes in a tangible way.

Venous Needle Dislodgement and Access-Bloodline Separation.

Serious hemodialysis therapy complications are venous needle dislodgement and access-bloodline separation. In 2020, the American Nephrology Nurses Association (ANNA) brought together a task force to update the information and resources developed by the 2012 ANNA Venous Needle Dislodgement Task Force along with the development of additional resources, if needed. The 2020-2021 ANNA Venous Needle Dislodgement Task Force conducted a literature review, requested information from ANNA members, and tested taping techniques. This article discusses the results of the literature review, information requests, and taping technique testing, and provides resources on venous needle dislodgement and access-bloodline dislodgement, along with practice recommendations.

Simulator-based hemodialysis cannulation skills training: a new horizon?

In accordance with the recently released Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative  (KDOQI) guidelines, there is a significant need for focused efforts on improving hemodialysis cannulation outcomes. Toward this, structured and meaningful training of our clinical personnel who cannulate in dialysis clinics is a priority. With the availability of advanced sensors and computing methods, simulators could be indispensable tools for standardized skills assessment and training. In this article we present ways in which sensor data could be used to quantify cannulation skill. As with many other medical specialties, implementation of simulator-based training holds the promise of much-needed improvement in end-stage kidney disease patient outcomes.

Considerations in Access Cannulation: Traditional and Evolving Approaches.

Needle cannulation of hemodialysis access is the soft underbelly of hemodialysis access care that has remained unchanged for a long time. Cannulation error results in complications such as infiltration, hematoma, subsequent revision procedures, and potential loss of hard-earned access. The "best" cannulation method is contingent upon access type and characteristics along with local expertise. The rope ladder technique of cannulation, characterized by successive rotation of puncture sites with each hemodialysis session, permits sufficient time for healing of prior cannulation sites, and reduction in complications such as bleeding, infection, and aneurysm development. A steeper needle angle, higher blood flow rates, and deep needle tip can lead to wall stress on the posterior wall and up to 10 cm from the needle cannulation site. Plastic cannulas provide a viable alternative to metallic needles; they have lower complications and a favorable cost-benefit ratio. There is lack of evidence to support an optimal arterial needle direction configuration. Needle injury may promote intimal thickening, but its effect on access outcomes is currently unknown. Percutaneous creation of arteriovenous fistula presents new challenges in dialysis access cannulation. Point-of-care ultrasound-guided cannulation will likely lead to a paradigm shift in access cannulation. Novel care delivery using cannulation stations is a promising development.

Recommended Clinical Trial End Points for Dialysis Catheters.

Central venous catheters are used frequently in patients on hemodialysis as a bridge to a permanent vascular access. They are prone to frequent complications, including catheter-related bloodstream infection, catheter dysfunction, and central vein obstruction. There is a compelling need to develop new drugs or devices to prevent central venous catheter complications. We convened a multidisciplinary panel of experts to propose standardized definitions of catheter end points to guide the design of future clinical trials seeking approval from the Food and Drug Administration. Our workgroup suggests diagnosing catheter-related bloodstream infection in catheter-dependent patients on hemodialysis with a clinical suspicion of infection (fever, rigors, altered mental status, or unexplained hypotension), blood cultures growing the same organism from the catheter hub and a peripheral vein (or the dialysis bloodline), and absence of evidence for an alternative source of infection. Catheter dysfunction is defined as the inability of a central venous catheter to (1) complete a single dialysis session without triggering recurrent pressure alarms or (2) reproducibly deliver a mean dialysis blood flow of >300 ml/min (with arterial and venous pressures being within the hemodialysis unit parameters) on two consecutive dialysis sessions or provide a Kt/V≥1.2 in 4 hours or less. Catheter dysfunction is defined only if it persists, despite attempts to reposition the patient, reverse the arterial and venous lines, or forcefully flush the catheter. Central vein obstruction is suspected in patients with >70% stenosis of a central vein by contrast venography or the equivalent, ipsilateral upper extremity edema, and an existing or prior history of a central venous catheter. There is some uncertainty about the specific criteria for these diagnoses, and the workgroup has also proposed future high-priority studies to resolve these questions.