ABSTRACT
The purpose of this case control study is to determine the impact of screw-retained fixed cross-arch prostheses, supported by four osseointegrated implants, on articulation and oromyofunctional behaviour. Objective (acoustic analysis) and subjective assessment techniques were used to determine the overall intelligibility, phonetic characteristics and oromyofunctional behaviour at an average period of 7.3 months after placement of the fixed implant prosthesis in 15 patients and 9 age-matched controls with intact dentition and without prosthetic appliances. Overall satisfaction with the prosthesis was 87%, but 53% of the subjects mentioned an impact on speech. 87% of the subjects presented with one or more distortions of the consonants. The most common distortions were distortions of the sound /s/ (sigmatismus simplex, 40% and sigmatismus stridens, 33%), simplex /z/ (27%), insufficient frication of /f/ (20%), /[symbol in text]/ (20%), addental production of /d/ (20%), /t/ (20%) or /s/ sound (13%) and devoiced /d/ (7%). In the control group, no articulation disorders were noted. Oromyofunctional behaviour in both groups was normal. To what extent motor-oriented speech therapy (with focus on tongue function) immediately after periodontal treatment (after wound healing) would decrease the persistent phonetic distortions is a subject for further research.
Subject(s)
Dental Implants , Mouth/physiopathology , Speech , Acoustics , Case-Control Studies , Humans , Patient SatisfactionABSTRACT
The purpose of this controlled study was to determine the impact of a single-tooth implant, fixed implant prosthesis and completely removable dental prosthesis on intelligibility, articulation and oromyofunctional behaviour. Additionally, the self-perceived overall satisfaction of the dental replacements and the effect on speech was questioned. Objective (acoustic analysis) as well as subjective assessment techniques (perceptual evaluation) were used. The satisfaction of single-tooth implant group was very high (100%) followed by a satisfaction of 87% for the fixed implant prosthesis group and 68% for the removable prosthesis group. The results of the phonetic analyses revealed a normal intelligibility and oromyofunctional behaviour in the three groups of dental replacements. Only one type of articulation disorders was observed in the single-tooth implant group, followed by three types of disorders in the removable prosthesis group and six types of disorders in the fixed implant prosthesis group. In this last group, not only 87% of the subjects showed distortions of one or more consonants but also most consonants of the Dutch language were disturbed in comparison with the single-tooth implant and removable prosthesis users. Special attention must be paid to the fricative /s/ because in more than 50% of all groups, this sound is disturbed.
Subject(s)
Articulation Disorders/etiology , Dental Implants, Single-Tooth/adverse effects , Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported/adverse effects , Dentures/adverse effects , Phonetics , Speech Intelligibility/physiology , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Belgium , Case-Control Studies , Deglutition/physiology , Female , Humans , Lip/physiology , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Satisfaction , Sucking Behavior/physiology , Tongue/physiology , Treatment Outcome , Young AdultABSTRACT
The main purpose of this study is to determine the impact (one and a half year after implantation) of a single-tooth implant on articulation and oromyofunctional behaviour. This information is important for dentists, orthodontists or stomatologists who treat professional speakers. Objective (acoustic analysis) as well as subjective (questionnaire, phonetic inventory, phonetic analysis, oromyofunctional assessment of lip and tongue function, blowing, sucking and swallowing) assessment techniques were used to determine the quality of life, articulation and oromyofunctional behaviour. Fourteen subjects who received a single-tooth implant and a control group of nine subjects participated in this study. The mean overall satisfaction of single-implant users was 95%. The subjects who received a single-tooth implant were capable of producing all Dutch vowels and consonants. The phonetic analysis revealed a sigmatism in 57% of the cases. Sigmatisms (stridens sigmatism followed by simplex sigmatism) were the most frequently observed phonetic disorders. There was interobserver agreement about normal lip and tongue functions. Moreover, blowing, sucking and swallowing patterns were normal (concordance value 96%). Detailed analyses 1 or 2 years after implantation of an anterior single-tooth implant revealed normal speech intelligibility and oromyofunctional behaviour. Articulation was characterised by the presence of a persistent phonetic disorder. Further research involving more subjects with an anterior single-tooth implant is needed.
Subject(s)
Dental Implants, Single-Tooth , Lip/physiology , Motor Skills/physiology , Mouth/physiology , Quality of Life , Speech Intelligibility/physiology , Tongue/physiology , Adaptation, Physiological/physiology , Adult , Aged , Anxiety/psychology , Articulation Disorders/etiology , Attitude to Health , Deglutition/physiology , Dental Implants, Single-Tooth/psychology , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Incisor , Male , Maxilla , Middle Aged , Patient Satisfaction , Phonetics , Pilot Projects , Speech Acoustics , Sucking Behavior/physiology , Young AdultABSTRACT
Subcutaneous emphysema is well known, but diffusion of gas into the mediastinum is not so common, particularly if it is caused by treatment of a root canal without apparent osseous fenestration or mucoperiostal lesions. We report a case of iatrogenic pneumomediastinum and facial emphysema after endodontic treatment. The diagnosis was confirmed by computed tomography, and the patient recovered after treatment with intravenous antibiotics and analgesia.
