ABSTRACT
The unannounced Joint Commission (TJC) accreditation survey can prove just as unpredictable and challenging as any other incident. In this article, the authors describe a plan developed by a hospital emergency response team that has proven successful in dealing with TJC and other surveys.
Subject(s)
Hospitals , Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations , Safety Management/standards , United StatesABSTRACT
Mislabeling of laboratory samples has been found to be a high-risk issue in acute care hospitals. The goal of this study was to decrease mislabeled blood specimens. In the first year after the implementation of a positive patient identification system using barcoding and computer technology, the number of labeling errors decreased from 103 to 8 per year. The outcome was clinically and statistically significant (P < .001).
Subject(s)
Medical Laboratory Personnel/standards , Nursing Staff, Hospital/standards , Patient Identification Systems/methods , Patient Identification Systems/standards , Point-of-Care Systems/standards , Specimen Handling/standards , Computer Systems/standards , Humans , Laboratories, Hospital/standards , Medical Errors/prevention & control , Printing , Program Development , Program Evaluation , Risk Management/methodsABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The primary objective of this study was to assess the feasibility of noninvasive mechanical ventilation (NIV) in cats. The secondary objective was to determine whether cardiovascular parameters and anesthetic drug requirements associated with noninvasive ventilation differ from those associated with invasive ventilation. DESIGN: Randomized, cross-over design. SETTING: A research laboratory in a veterinary teaching hospital. ANIMALS: Eight healthy adult cats, 3 intact females and 5 intact males, weighing between 3 and 6 kg, were used. INTERVENTIONS: Each cat was randomly assigned to NIV via nasal mask, or invasive ventilation using an endotracheal tube. Mechanical ventilation was performed for 6 hours. Anesthesia was provided using continuous infusions of propofol and butorphanol. After a minimum 9-day washout period, the procedure was repeated using the alternate ventilation interface. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Cardiovascular parameters (heart rate, rectal temperature, direct arterial blood pressure), arterial blood gases, drug requirements, sedation score, and ventilation parameters, were monitored throughout the procedures. These values were evaluated using ANCOVA for repeated measures. All cats were effectively ventilated using NIV. There were no significant differences in cardiovascular parameters, drug requirements, or sedation scores between groups. Although PaCO(2) values did not differ, PaO(2) values were significantly higher in the invasively ventilated group. Inspiratory tidal volumes were similar between groups, whereas expiratory tidal volumes were significantly lower in the NIV group. Inspiratory pressures were significantly higher in the NIV group. Respiratory frequency was significantly higher in the invasively ventilated group. CONCLUSIONS: NIV of cats is possible. However, currently it does not confer any cardiovascular benefit over invasive ventilation and drug requirements are similar. Use of a correctly fitted mask is essential for successful NIV as air leaks account for the observed discrepancy between inspiratory and expiratory volumes. Further investigation into this modality is warranted.
