Feasibility of same-day discharge of robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy with pelvic lymph node dissection.

PURPOSE: Prostate cancer is one of the most common oncologic diseases. Outpatient robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP) has gained popularity due to its ability to minimize patient costs while maintaining low complication rates. Few studies have analyzed the possibility of performing outpatient RALP specifically in patients undergoing concurrent pelvic lymph node dissections (PLND). METHODS: Using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database (NSQIP), we identified total number of RALP, stratified into inpatient and outpatient groups including those with and without PLND from 2016 to 2021. Baseline characteristics, intraoperative and postoperative complications, and unplanned readmission rates were summarized. Proportions of outpatient procedures were calculated to assess adoption of outpatient protocol. RESULTS: Between 2016 and 2021, a total of 58,527 RALP were performed, 3.7% (2142) outpatient and 96.3% inpatient. Altogether, patients undergoing outpatient RALP without PLND were more likely to have hypertension (52.6% vs. 46.3%, p < 0.01). Patients undergoing outpatient RALP without PLND were more likely to have sepsis or urinary tract infections (3.4% vs. 1.9%, p = 0.04) when compared to outpatient RALP with PLND. Cardiopulmonary, renal, thromboembolic complications, and 30-day events such as unplanned readmission, reoperation rates, and mortality were similar in both groups. However, among multivariate analysis regarding 30-day readmission and complications, there were no significant differences between outpatient RALP with or without PLND. CONCLUSION: Patients undergoing outpatient RALP without PLND were more likely to have baseline hypertension and higher rates of postoperative infection, when compared to outpatient RALP with PLND. No significant differences were seen regarding 30-day readmission or complications on multivariate analysis.

Concussion Rates in Youth Lacrosse Players and Comparison With Youth American Football.

Background: There has been little focus on concussions in youth lacrosse players in the United States. Purpose: To provide a descriptive analysis of the epidemiology and incidence of concussions in youth lacrosse and compare the results with well-documented analyses of concussions in youth American football. Study Design: Descriptive epidemiology study. Methods: Data on concussions in pediatric patients playing lacrosse from 2006 to 2019 were collected using the National Electronic Injury Surveillance System (NEISS). Weighted calculations and combined participation data obtained from membership in USA Lacrosse were used to estimate injury incidence. A comparison dataset was created using the NEISS data on youth football-related concussions. The cause of concussion was categorized into player-to-player, player-to-stick, player-to-ball, or player-to-ground contact. Results: A total of 37,974 concussion injuries related to lacrosse were identified in players with a mean age of 14.5 ± 3.5 years; 70% of concussions occurred in boys. National participation in lacrosse increased from 2006 to 2011 by a mean of 10.3% annually, followed by a lower annual growth rate of 2.5% from 2012 to 2019. The overall incidence of concussion injuries increased over the study period (r = 0.314), with the incidence rate in boys being greater than that of girls from 2009 to 2013. The most common cause of concussion was player-to-ground contact for boys and player-to-ball or player-to-stick contact for girls. The mean annual concussion incidences in youth lacrosse and youth football were 443 and 355 per 100,000 participants, respectively. Conclusion: Over the study period, 16% of lacrosse injuries were diagnosed as concussions, a higher mean annual incidence per 100,000 participants than that of youth football (443 vs 355). The cause of concussion was different based on sex, with higher rates of player-to-ball or player-to-stick contact in female players versus player-to-ground contact in male players.

Renal malakoplakia with invasion of the liver and diaphragm: a patient case and literature review.

Renal malakoplakia, a seldom seen chronic inflammatory condition, continues to elude medical, surgical, radiological and pathological specialists due to its mimicry of other renal pathologies and low incidence. The variable clinical manifestations and non-specific radiological findings of malakoplakia can be misleading, and ultimately require a pathological diagnosis. A literature review reveals an extremely low prevalence of renal malakoplakia, a handful of invasive renal malakoplakia cases and no reports of liver and diaphragmatic invasion. We present a case of a renal mass with liver and diaphragmatic invasion in a 59-year-old woman that deceived clinicians and radiologists until a pathological diagnosis of renal malakoplakia was performed. This case highlights the need of awareness for malakoplakia in the differential diagnosis for renal invasive and non-invasive masses. The need to await a surgical biopsy and pathological diagnosis is critical to ensure a correct diagnosis and avoid unnecessary surgery of the kidney.

Application of risk assessment tools to predict opioid usage after shoulder surgery.

Background: Currently 128 people die daily from opioid-related overdoses in the United States. This burden has instigated a search for viable means to guide postoperative prescription decision-making. The Opioid Risk Tool (ORT) and the Screener and Opioid Assessment for Patient with Pain (SOAPP) are validated risk assessment tools to predict opioid usage in high-risk populations. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of these opioid risk assessments and pain intensity scores, including the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS), to predict postoperative opioid use and dependence in shoulder surgery. Methods: A retrospective review of 81 patients who underwent shoulder surgery and completed 3 preoperative risk and pain assessments within a single hospital system from 2018 to 2020 was performed. Demographic variables and ORT-O, SOAPP-R (the revised version of the SOAPP assessment), and PROMIS 3a scores were recorded from preoperative assessments. Opioid prescriptions were recorded from Electronic-Florida Online Reporting of Controlled Substances Evaluation. Dependence was defined as opioid prescriptions at or greater than 3 months after surgery. Risk assessment scores were compared and tested against postoperative opioid prescriptions using statistical analyses and logistic regression modeling. Results: In the cohort, there were 36 female and 45 male patients with an average age of 64.5 years and body mass index of 28.0. Preoperatively, the average pain score was 6.2, and 7.8% of patients reported prolonged preoperative narcotics use. The average ORT-O score was 3.0, with 35.8% of patients defined as either medium or high risk, and the average PROMIS pain intensity preoperatively was 10.8. Neither the ORT-O nor the PROMIS pain score were good predictors of postoperative opioid dependence (area under curve = 0.39 and 0.43, respectively). The SOAPP-R performed slightly better (area under curve = 0.70) and was the only assessment with significantly different mean scores between patients with postoperative opioid dependence and those without (33.4 and 24.5, respectively, P = .049) and a moderate correlation to postoperative total morphine equivalents (R = 0.46, P = .007). Conclusion: With recent focus on preoperative risk assessments to predict postoperative opioid use and dependence, it is important to understand how well these tools work when applied to orthopedic patients. While the ORT may be helpful in other fields, it does not seem to be a strong predictor of postoperative opioid use or dependence in patients undergoing various types of shoulder surgery. Future studies are needed to explore the utility of the SOAPP-R in a larger sample and identify tools applicable to the orthopedic population to assist surgeons in screening at-risk patients.

Recognising immunotherapy-induced meningoencephalitis: a case during treatment for primary metastatic melanoma of the bladder neck.

Although novel immunotherapy has shown promise for patients with melanoma, a more activated state of the immune system may lead to adverse systemic effects. Immunotherapy-induced meningoencephalitis is a rare and seldom reported adverse effect of immunotherapy but with the expanding role of immunotherapy in cancer treatments it must be recognised. Patients receiving immunotherapy should receive a proper warning about the potential for this life-threatening condition. Herein, we report a patient in his 70s with neurological changes after his second treatment with dual immunotherapy for a primary metastatic melanoma of the bladder neck.

Addressing the Rapidly Increasing Need for Telemedicine Education for Future Physicians.

INTRODUCTION: As the COVID-19 pandemic affected the ability to conduct in-person sessions to teach clinical skills, our medical school developed a curriculum to introduce first-year medical students to telemedicine visits, while also reinforcing their history-taking and clinical reasoning skills. METHODS: All first-year medical students at Florida Atlantic University went through three sessions on telemedicine that began with a lecture, followed by a standardized patient interaction, then a small group meeting with clinical faculty. We assessed the sessions using survey questions on a 5-point Likert scale and additional narrative feedback. We also assessed students on a telemedicine objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) at the end of the semester and compared results to the previous year's same case done in person. RESULTS: Students overall found the sessions helpful for refining their history-taking skills and that the knowledge gained would be helpful in their future practices. They felt the online platform was a useful way to interact with patients, but had frustrations with technical difficulties. They also expressed a greater appreciation for the ability to perform an in-person physical examination. Students performed similarly on the OSCE station in person compared to virtual visits (mean score 93% vs 93.75%). CONCLUSION: Introducing telemedicine during a first-year medical school clinical skills course provides students with opportunities to refine their clinical skills while introducing a skill that will be commonplace in the postpandemic environment. This curriculum could be adopted not only during a time of necessary distance learning, but also continued as in-person education resumes.

Elimination diets for eosinophilic esophagitis: making the best choice.

INTRODUCTION: Dietary elimination therapy has long been an option for patients with eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). Multiple diets have been reported, with variable efforts involved, efficacy rates, costs, and long-term management plans. Although the pros and cons of dietary elimination therapy have been described, a clear method for deciding on who is the right candidate for a diet, and which diet is best for that candidate, has not been clearly delineated. AREAS COVERED: This article covers the benefits and challenges of dietary elimination therapies for patients with EoE. It outlines factors to consider before opting for an elimination diet, and for choosing which specific elimination diet to follow. Efficacy rates and pros and cons of each specific elimination diet are also discussed. Peer-reviewed published studies testing various elimination diets in patients with EoE were used for that purpose. EXPERT OPINION: Dietary elimination therapy is a long-term management option for patients with EoE. Shared decision making involving the patient and the medical provider is important. Multiple factors including demographics, diet, nutritional status, social and financial support, and acceptance of multiple endoscopies need to be considered. Ongoing multi-disciplinary support during the initiation and maintenance phases of the diet is crucial to ensure good outcomes.