ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: The utility of using meat models for ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia simulation training has been well established. Feedback is considered the most important element of successful simulation-based education, and simulation offers an opportunity for evaluation. The objective of this study was to establish the discriminative ability of dye injected into a meat model to determine whether injectate is properly placed in the perineural (PN) space, thus providing an additional tool for learner feedback and evaluation. METHODS: Meat models containing a beef tendon (simulating a nerve) were injected with dye in one of 3 locations: PN, intraneural, and intramuscular. Blinded assessors then independently interpreted the dye staining on the models, marked the interpreted injection location, ease of interpretation, and whether staining was present on the beef tendon. RESULTS: Thirty meat models were injected with dye and independently assessed. Determining the location of injection was deemed to be easy or very easy in 72% of the models. Assessors correctly identified PN, intraneural, and intramuscular injections 100%, 95%, and 85% of the time, respectively. Assessor agreement was 87%. CONCLUSIONS: The location of dye injected into a meat model, simulating a peripheral nerve blockade, can be accurately and reliably scored to provide feedback to learners. This technique offers a novel means of providing feedback to trainees and assessing block success in ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia simulation.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: In order to combat rising rates of antimicrobial resistant infections, it is vital that antimicrobial stewardship become embedded in primary health care (PHC). Despite the high use of antimicrobials in PHC settings, there is a lack of data regarding the integration of antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASP) in non-hospital settings. Our research aimed to determine which antimicrobial stewardship interventions are optimal to introduce into PHC clinics beginning to engage with an ASP, as well as how to optimize those interventions. This work became focused specifically around management of viral upper respiratory tract infections (URTIs), as these infections are one of the main sources of inappropriate antibiotic use. METHODS: This mixed methods study of sequential explanatory design was developed through three research projects over 3 years in Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada. First, a survey of PHC providers was performed to determine their perceived needs from a PHC-based ASP. From this work, a "viral prescription pad" was developed to provide a tool to help PHC providers engage in patient education regarding appropriate antimicrobial use, specifically for URTIs. Next, interviews were performed with family physicians to discuss their perceived utility of this tool. Finally, we performed a public survey to determine preferences for the medium by which information is received regarding symptom management for viral URTIs. RESULTS: The majority of PHC providers responding to the initial survey indicated they were improperly equipped with tools to aid in promoting conversations with patients and providing education about the appropriate use of antimicrobials. Following dissemination of the viral prescription pad and semi-structured interviews with family physicians, the viral prescription pad was deemed to be a useful educational tool. However, about half of the physicians interviewed indicated they did not actually provide a viral prescription to patients when providing advice on symptom management for viral URTIs. When asked about their preferences, 76% of respondents to the public survey indicated they would prefer to receive written or a combination of verbal and written information in this circumstance. CONCLUSIONS: PHC providers indicated a need for educational tools to promote conversations with patients and provide education about the appropriate use of antimicrobials. Viral prescription pads were regarded by family physicians and patients as useful tools in facilitating discussion on the appropriate use of antimicrobials. PHC providers should exercise caution in opting out of providing written forms of information, as many respondents to the general public survey indicated their preference in receiving both verbal and written information.
