Dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate induces acute vasodilation of porcine coronary arteries in vitro and in vivo.

Although an inverse relationship between dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate (DHEAS) and coronary artery disease has been demonstrated in men, the vascular effects of DHEAS are not well defined. The vasoactive effects of intracoronary DHEAS and testosterone (0.1 nM to 1 microM) were examined in vivo in 24 pigs. Epicardial cross-sectional area was measured by intravascular ultrasound, and coronary flow velocity by intravascular Doppler velocimetry. We also examined the effects of antagonism of the androgen receptor, nitric oxide synthase, and potassium channels on DHEAS-induced vasodilation in vitro in coronary rings from male and female pig hearts. DHEAS and testosterone induced increases in cross-sectional area, average peak velocity, and coronary blood flow. The maximal increase in coronary blood flow in response to testosterone was 1.26-fold (P=0.02), and in average peak velocity 1.43-fold (P=0.05), greater than that to DHEAS, whereas increases in cross-sectional area were similar. Vasodilation to both hormones was rapid, with maximal responses occurring <10 minutes after administration. In vitro, DHEAS and testosterone induced vasodilation in coronary rings, greater with testosterone. At doses of 0.1 and 1 microM, the vasodilator effects of DHEAS and testosterone were inhibited by the androgen receptor antagonist flutamide but not the estrogen receptor antagonist ICI 182,780. At 10 microM, neither DHEAS- nor testosterone-induced vasorelaxation was inhibited by flutamide, ICI 182,780, L-NAME, or deendothelialization, but both were attenuated by pretreatment with glibenclamide. No gender differences were observed in any of the responses examined. In conclusion, DHEAS is an acute coronary artery vasodilator, but less potent than testosterone. Its effect might be mediated via androgen receptors and may involve ATP-sensitive potassium channels.

Comparative effects of aspirin with ACE inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker on myocardial infarction and vascular function.

OBJECTIVES: We previously showed that an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (captopril) or an angiotensin receptor blocker (losartan) reduced infarct size and improved endothelial function in a rat model of ischaemia-reperfusion. The present study was undertaken to see if aspirin (ASA) antagonised the beneficial effects of captopril or losartan. METHODS: One hundred and fourteen Sprague-Dawley rats were randomised into six groups; Control, ASA, captopril, losartan, ASA+captopril, and ASA+losartan. ASA, captopril or losartan were given at a concentration of 40 mg/kg/day in drinking water. After six weeks of pre-treatment, the rats were subjected to 17 minutes of left anterior descending coronary artery occlusion and 120 minutes of reperfusion, with haemodynamic and ECG monitoring. During the reperfusion period, the effective refractory period (ERP), ventricular fibrillation threshold (VFT) and bleeding time (BT) were measured. In fresh aortic rings precontracted with phenylephrine, endothelium-dependent and -independent relaxations were assessed using acetylcholine and nitroglycerin. RESULTS: Haemodynamic changes were not different between the groups. Serum ASA concentrations were 0.5, 1.1 and 0.6 mg/dl in the ASA, ASA+captopril and ASA+losartan groups, respectively, and BT was prolonged (p<0.01). ASA alone reduced endothelium-dependent relaxation (-29+8 vs. -69+11%, p<0.01), but did not change endothelium-independent relaxation. ASA did not affect endothelial relaxation induced by acetylcholine in the presence of either captopril or losartan. Angiotensin I and ERP were elevated by captopril and losartan. Angiotensin II and VFT were elevated by losartan. ASA with captopril, captopril and losartan equally reduced infarct size, compared with control (39+3, 39+4, and 39+5 vs. 53+3%, all p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Captopril and losartan had similar cardiovascular protective effects in a rat model of ischaemia-reperfusion. Aspirin did not attenuate the cardiovascular protective effects of captopril or losartan.

The renin-angiotensin system does not contribute to the endothelial dysfunction and increased infarct size in rats exposed to second hand smoke.

INTRODUCTION: Both second hand smoke (SHS) and the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) contribute to endothelial dysfunction and increased infarct size in a rat ischaemia-reperfusion model. However, the potential interaction between SHS and the RAS is unknown. METHODS: Eighty-four rats were randomised into four groups: group C was a normal control; L was given 40 mg/kg/day of losartan in drinking water; SC and SL were exposed to SHS (smoking chamber) and given regular water or 40 mg/kg/day of losartan in drinking water, respectively. After six weeks of pre-treatment, rats were subjected to 17 minutes of left coronary artery occlusion and 2 hours of reperfusion with haemodynamic and ECG monitoring. RESULTS: Haemodynamics were not significantly different among the four groups. Losartan increased the threshold for ventricular fibrillation (p=0.0001) and reduced spontaneous ventricular arrhythmias (p=0.002) during ischaemia-reperfusion, while SHS did not (p=0.713, 0.110), and there was no interaction between losartan and SHS. The maximal endothelium-dependent vasorelaxation induced by a calcium ionophore (A23187) was increased by losartan (p=0.007). Myocardial infarct size was smaller in the losartan groups (p=0.032), larger in the SHS groups (p=0.0001), and there was no significant interaction. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, losartan decreased infarct size and increased endothelium-dependent vasorelaxation. SHS exposure impaired endothelial function and increased infarct size. The effects of losartan and SHS were consistently independent of each other. These results suggest that the RAS does not contribute to the adverse effects of SHS.