Free functional muscle transfer for lower extremity reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Free functional muscle transfer is a reconstructive strategy for the reconstruction of lost muscle units in the lower extremity after oncologic resection, trauma, compartment syndrome, or severe nerve injuries. Under appropriate circumstances, free functional muscle transfer may be the only suitable reconstructive option. This article reviews the underlying principles of free functional muscle transfer, its application to lower extremity reconstruction, appropriate patient selection, and surgical techniques. METHODS: The underlying principles of free functional muscle transfer, its application to lower extremity reconstruction, appropriate patient selection, and surgical techniques are presented. Commonly used donor muscles appropriate for each type of functional defect are discussed. A review of recent publications on free functional muscle transfer in the lower extremity was also performed. RESULTS: Good functional recovery with a Medical Research Council grade of up to 4/5 and full range of motion can be attained with free functional muscle transfer. Clinical outcomes and specific parameters for published case series in lower extremity free functional muscle transfer are presented and an illustrative case. CONCLUSION: Free functional muscle transfer is a suitable treatment for the appropriate patient to restore essential functions and potentially regain ambulation. However, additional published clinical outcomes are needed and represent a major area for further investigation.

Quantifying Tenodesis Hand Function in Cervical Spinal Cord Injury: Implications for Function.

PURPOSE: Cervical spinal cord injury (SCI) has a profound effect on upper-extremity function. Individuals with stiffness and/or spasticity may have more, or less, useful tenodesis function. This study examined the variability present before any reconstructive surgery. METHODS: Tenodesis pinch and grasp were measured with the wrist in maximal active extension. Tenodesis pinch was the contact point of the thumb with the index finger proximal phalanx (T-IF:P1), middle phalanx (T-IF:P2), distal phalanx (T-IF:P3), or absent (T-IF:absent). Tenodesis grasp was the distance from the long finger to the distal palmar crease (LF-DPC). Activities of daily living function was assessed using the Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM). RESULTS: The study included 27 individuals (4 females, 23 males; mean age 36 years, mean time since SCI 6.8 years). The mean International Classification for Surgery of the Hand in Tetraplegia (ICSHT) group classification was 3. In the dominant hand, individuals with a T-IF tenodesis pinch to P1 or P2 had significantly higher total SCIM scores (43.7 and 34.2, respectively) compared to those with absent T-IF tenodesis pinch (SCIM 17.8). Shorter LF-DPC distance with tenodesis grasp (improved finger closing) also correlated with improved SCIM mobility and total scores. No association was found between the ICSHT group and SCIM score or tenodesis measures. CONCLUSIONS: Quantifying tenodesis with pinch (T-IF) and grasp (LF-DPC) is a simple method to characterize hand movement in individuals with cervical SCI. Better tenodesis pinch and grasp were associated with improved activities of daily living performance. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Differences in grasp function have implications for mobility, and differences in pinch function have implications for all functions, particularly self-care. These physical measurements could be used to assess movement changes after nonsurgical and surgical treatment in tetraplegia.

A Randomized Controlled Trial Evaluating the Impact of Pre-Consultation Information on Patients' Perception of Information Conveyed and Satisfaction with the Decision-Making Process.

BACKGROUND: Patient participation in treatment decision-making is a health care priority. This study hypothesized that providing a decision aid before surgical consultation would better prepare patients for decision-making. The objective was to examine the impact of a decision aid versus high-quality websites on patients' perceptions of information conveyed during surgical consultation and satisfaction with the decision process. METHODS: Patients with stages 0 to 3 breast cancer were randomized. Surveys assessed perceptions of information conveyed, being asked surgical preference, and satisfaction with the decision process. Multivariable logistic regression assessed associations between outcomes and randomization arm, patient factors, and surgeon. Change in Pseudo-R2 assessed the comparative effect of these factors on perceptions of the information conveyed. RESULTS: The median patient age was 59 years. Most of the patients (98%) were white, and 62% were college educated (n = 201). The findings showed no association between randomization arm and perceptions of information conveyed, being asked surgical preference, or satisfaction with the decision process. Most of the patients reported discussing both breast-conserving therapy and mastectomy (69%) and being asked their surgical preference (65%). The surgeon seen was more important than the randomization arm or the patient factors in predicting patients' perceptions of information conveyed (explained 64-69% of the variation), and 63% of the patients were satisfied with the decision process. CONCLUSION: Use of a decision aid compared with high-quality websites did not increase patients' perceptions of information conveyed or satisfaction with the decision process. Although the surgeon seen influenced aspects of the patient experience, the surgeon was not associated with satisfaction. Understanding the factors driving low satisfaction is critical because this is increasingly used as a marker of health care quality.

Feasibility of Providing Web-Based Information to Breast Cancer Patients Prior to a Surgical Consult.

Patients facing decisions for breast cancer surgery commonly search the internet. Directing patients to high-quality websites prior to the surgeon consultation may be one way of supporting patients' informational needs. The objective was to test an approach for delivering web-based information to breast cancer patients. The implementation strategy was developed using the Replicating Effective Programs framework. Pilot testing measured the proportion that accepted the web-based information. A pre-consultation survey assessed whether the information was reviewed and the acceptability to stakeholders. Reasons for declining guided refinement to the implementation package. Eighty-two percent (309/377) accepted the web-based information. Of the 309 that accepted, 244 completed the pre-consultation survey. Participants were a median 59 years, white (98%), and highly educated (>50% with a college degree). Most patients who completed the questionnaire reported reviewing the website (85%), and nearly all found it helpful. Surgeons thought implementation increased visit efficiency (5/6) and would result in patients making more informed decisions (6/6). The most common reasons patients declined information were limited internet comfort or access (n = 36), emotional distress (n = 14), and preference to receive information directly from the surgeon (n = 7). Routine delivery of web-based information to breast cancer patients prior to the surgeon consultation is feasible. High stakeholder acceptability combined with the low implementation burden means that these findings have immediate relevance for improving care quality.

A Randomized Controlled Trial Evaluating the Impact of Web-Based Information on Breast Cancer Patients' Knowledge of Surgical Treatment Options.

BACKGROUND: Previous research suggests that providing information to women newly diagnosed with breast cancer, during the gap between cancer diagnosis and their first surgeon consultation, may support decision making. Our objective was to compare patients' knowledge after the pre-consultation delivery of standard websites vs a web-based decision aid (DA). STUDY DESIGN: We randomized women with stage 0 to III breast cancer, within an academic and community breast clinic, to be emailed a link to selected standard websites (National Cancer Institute, American Cancer Society, Breastcancer.org,) vs the Health Dialog DA (Clinicaltrials.govNCT03116035). Patients seeking second opinions, diagnosed by excisional biopsy, or without an email address, were ineligible. Pre-consultation knowledge was assessed using the Breast Cancer Surgery Decision Quality Instrument. We compared differences in knowledge using t-test. RESULTS: Median patient age was 59 years, 99% were white, and 65% had a college degree or higher, with no differences in demographics between study arms. Knowledge was higher in patients who received the DA (median 80% vs 66% correct, p = 0.01). Decision-aid patients were more likely to know that waiting a few weeks to make a treatment decision would not affect survival (72% vs 54%, p < 0.01). Patients in both arms found the information helpful (median score 8 of 10). CONCLUSIONS: Although patients found receipt of any pre-consultation information helpful, the DA resulted in improved knowledge over standard websites and effectively conveyed that there is time to make a breast cancer surgery decision. Decreasing the urgency patients feel may improve the quality of patient-surgeon interactions and lead to more informed decision-making.

Quality of online information to support patient decision-making in breast cancer surgery.

BACKGROUND: Breast cancer patients commonly use the internet as an information resource. Our objective was to evaluate the quality of online information available to support patients facing a decision for breast surgery. METHODS: Breast cancer surgery-related queries were performed (Google and Bing), and reviewed for content pertinent to breast cancer surgery. The DISCERN instrument was used to evaluate websites' structural components that influence publication reliability and ability of information to support treatment decision-making. Scores of 4/5 were considered "good." RESULTS: 45 unique websites were identified. Websites satisfied a median 5/9 content questions. Commonly omitted topics included: having a choice between breast conservation and mastectomy (67%) and potential for 2nd surgery to obtain negative margins after breast conservation (60%). Websites had a median DISCERN score of 2.9 (range 2.0-4.5). Websites achieved higher scores on structural criteria (median 3.6 [2.1-4.7]), with 24% rated as "good." Scores on supporting decision-making questions were lower (2.6 [1.3-4.4]), with only 7% scoring "good." CONCLUSION: Although numerous breast cancer-related websites exist, most do a poor job providing women with essential information necessary to actively participate in decision-making for breast cancer surgery. Providing easily- accessible, high-quality online information has the potential to significantly improve patients' experiences with decision-making.

Microsurgical Technique Modifications: Practical Tips for Improving Precision.

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.