First-in-human controlled inhalation of thin graphene oxide nanosheets to study acute cardiorespiratory responses.

Graphene oxide nanomaterials are being developed for wide-ranging applications but are associated with potential safety concerns for human health. We conducted a double-blind randomized controlled study to determine how the inhalation of graphene oxide nanosheets affects acute pulmonary and cardiovascular function. Small and ultrasmall graphene oxide nanosheets at a concentration of 200 µg m-3 or filtered air were inhaled for 2 h by 14 young healthy volunteers in repeated visits. Overall, graphene oxide nanosheet exposure was well tolerated with no adverse effects. Heart rate, blood pressure, lung function and inflammatory markers were unaffected irrespective of graphene oxide particle size. Highly enriched blood proteomics analysis revealed very few differential plasma proteins and thrombus formation was mildly increased in an ex vivo model of arterial injury. Overall, acute inhalation of highly purified and thin nanometre-sized graphene oxide nanosheets was not associated with overt detrimental effects in healthy humans. These findings demonstrate the feasibility of carefully controlled human exposures at a clinical setting for risk assessment of graphene oxide, and lay the foundations for investigating the effects of other two-dimensional nanomaterials in humans. Clinicaltrials.gov ref: NCT03659864.

PAR4 Antagonism in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease Receiving Antiplatelet Therapies.

BACKGROUND: BMS-986141 is a novel potent highly selective antagonist of PAR (protease-activated receptor) type 4. PAR4 antagonism has been demonstrated to reduce thrombus formation in isolation and in combination with factor Xa inhibition in high shear conditions in healthy people. We sought to determine whether PAR4 antagonism had additive antithrombotic effects in patients with coronary artery disease who were receiving antiplatelet therapy. METHODS: Forty-five patients with stable coronary heart disease and 10 healthy volunteers completed a phase 2a open-label 4-arm single-center study. Patients were allocated to 1 of 3 treatment arms for 7 days: (1) ticagrelor (90 mg BID), (2) aspirin (75 mg QD), or (3) the combination of ticagrelor and aspirin. Agonist-induced platelet aggregation, platelet activation, and ex vivo thrombus formation were measured before and 2 and 24 hours after a single oral 4-mg dose of BMS-986141 on the first study visit day in all participants. RESULTS: BMS-986141 demonstrated highly selective inhibition of PAR4-AP (agonist peptide)-induced platelet aggregation, P-selectin expression, and platelet-monocyte aggregate expression (P≤0.001 for all), which were unaffected by concomitant antiplatelet therapies. PAR4 antagonism reduced ex vivo thrombus area in high shear conditions in healthy volunteers (-21%; P=0.001) and in patients receiving ticagrelor alone (-28%; P=0.001), aspirin alone (-23%; P=0.018), or both in combination (-24%; P≤0.001). Plasma concentration of BMS-986141 correlated with PAR4-AP-induced platelet responses (P≤0.001 for all) and total thrombus area under high shear stress conditions (P≤0.01 for all). CONCLUSIONS: PAR4 antagonism has additive antithrombotic effects when used in addition to ticagrelor, aspirin, or their combination, in patients with stable coronary heart disease. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT05093790.

Arterial stiffness, endothelial dysfunction and impaired fibrinolysis are pathogenic mechanisms contributing to cardiovascular risk in ANCA-associated vasculitis.

Cardiovascular disease is a complication of systemic inflammatory diseases including anti-neutrophil cytoplasm antibody-associated vasculitis (AAV). The mechanisms of cardiovascular morbidity in AAV are poorly understood, and risk-reduction strategies are lacking. Therefore, in a series of double-blind, randomized case-control forearm plethysmography and crossover systemic interventional studies, we examined arterial stiffness and endothelial function in patients with AAV in long-term disease remission and in matched healthy volunteers (32 each group). The primary outcome for the case-control study was the difference in endothelium-dependent vasodilation between health and AAV, and for the crossover study was the difference in pulse wave velocity (PWV) between treatment with placebo and selective endothelin-A receptor antagonism. Parallel in vitro studies of circulating monocytes and platelets explored mechanisms. Compared to healthy volunteers, patients with AAV had 30% reduced endothelium-dependent vasodilation and 50% reduced acute release of endothelial active tissue plasminogen activator (tPA), both significant in the case-control study. Patients with AAV had significantly increased arterial stiffness (PWV: 7.3 versus 6.4 m/s). Plasma endothelin-1 was two-fold higher in AAV and independently predicted PWV and tPA release. Compared to placebo, both selective endothelin-A and dual endothelin-A/B receptor blockade reduced PWV and increased tPA release in AAV in the crossover study. Mechanistically, patients with AAV had increased platelet activation, more platelet-monocyte aggregates, and altered monocyte endothelin receptor function, reflecting reduced endothelin-1 clearance. Patients with AAV in long-term remission have elevated cardiovascular risk and endothelin-1 contributes to this. Thus, our data support a role for endothelin-blockers to reduce cardiovascular risk by reducing arterial stiffness and increasing circulating tPA activity.