Checkpoint Inhibitor Monotherapy in Potentially Trial-Eligible or Trial-Ineligible Patients With Metastatic NSCLC in the German Prospective CRISP Registry Real-World Cohort (AIO-TRK-0315).

Introduction: Patients with metastatic NSCLC (mNSCLC) treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors in clinical practice may often not meet the strict inclusion criteria of clinical trials. Our aim was to assess the trial eligibility of patients with mNSCLC treated with pembrolizumab monotherapy in real-world and to compare the outcome of "trial-ineligible" and "potentially trial-eligible" patients. Methods: Data from the prospective, clinical research platform CRISP were used to compare patient characteristics, treatment, and outcome of patients with programmed cell death-ligand 1 tumor proportion score greater than or equal to 50% tumors treated with pembrolizumab monotherapy who are deemed either "potentially trial-eligible" or "trial-ineligible" according to inclusion and exclusion criteria of the registrational studies (KEYNOTE-024 and -042). Results: Of 746 patients included, 343 patients (46.0%) were classified as "trial-ineligible" and had significantly worse outcomes compared with "potentially trial-eligible" patients (n = 403, 54.0%): median progression-free survival: 6.2 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 5.2-8.4) versus 10.3 (95% CI: 8.4-13.8) months, hazard ratio (trial-ineligible versus potentially trial-eligible) of 1.43 (95% CI: 1.19-1.72), p less than 0.001; median overall survival: 15.9 (95% CI: 11.4-20.3) versus 25.3 (95% CI: 19.8-30.4) months, hazard ratio of 1.36 (95% CI: 1.10-1.67), p equals 0.004. Conclusions: Our data reveal that a considerable proportion of patients with mNSCLC are not eligible to participate in a clinical trial and were found to have worse outcomes than potentially trial-eligible patients, whose outcomes were comparable with those obtained from pivotal clinical trials. This is of substantial clinical relevance for physicians discussing outcomes to be expected with their patients and stresses the need for real-world effectiveness analyses.

Fluctuation of Acquired Resistance Mutations and Re-Challenge with EGFR TKI in Metastatic NSCLC: A Case Report.

Osimertinib has become the preferred first-line therapy for epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation-positive metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in recent years. Originally, it was approved for second-line treatment after epidermal growth factor receptor EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) of the first and second generations had failed and EGFR T790M had emerged as a mode of resistance. Osimertinib itself provokes a wide array of on- and off-target molecular alterations that can limit therapeutic success. Liquid biopsy ctDNA (circulating tumor DNA) analysis by hybrid capture (HC) next-generation sequencing (NGS) can help to identify alterations in a minimally invasive way and allows for the detection of common as well as rare resistance alterations. We describe a young female patient who was initially diagnosed with metastatic EGFR L858R-positive NSCLC. She received EGFR TKI therapy at different timepoints during the course of the disease and developed sequential EGFR resistance alterations (EGFR T790M and C797S). In the course of her disease, resistance alteration became undetectable, and the tumor was successfully rechallenged with the original first-generation EGFR TKI as well as osimertinib and altogether showed prolonged response despite a prognostically negative TP53 alteration. To date, the patient has been alive for more than seven years, though initially diagnosed with a heavy metastatic burden.

Comparative efficacy and safety of multitarget angiogenesis inhibitor combined with immune checkpoint inhibitor and nivolumab monotherapy as second-line or beyond for advanced lung adenocarcinoma in driver-negative patients: a retrospective comparative cohort study.

Background: The efficacy of immune monotherapy is not satisfactory in patients with advanced, treated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Combining antiangiogenic agents and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) can counteract the immunosuppression and confer synergistic therapeutic benefits. We explored the efficacy and safety of anlotinib and ICIs as a second- and subsequent-line treatment for advanced lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) in patients without oncogenic driver alterations. Methods: We reviewed patients with driver-negative LUAD who had received anlotinib, a multityrosine kinase inhibitor affecting vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR), fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR), platelet-derived growth factor receptor (PDGFR) and c-Kit, in combination with ICIs from October 2018 to July 2021 at Shanghai Chest Hospital as second- and subsequent-line treatment. Patients with advanced driver-negative LUAD who received nivolumab monotherapy as second-line treatment were included as a control group. Results: In this study, 71 patients were included who had received anlotinib and programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) blockade combination therapy as second- and subsequent-line treatment, and 63 patients who had received nivolumab monotherapy as second-line therapy were included as controls, most of whom were male smokers at stage IV. The median progression-free survival (PFS) of the combination therapy and nivolumab monotherapy groups were 6.00 and 3.41 months, respectively (P<0.001). The median overall survival (OS) of the combination therapy and nivolumab monotherapy groups were 16.13 and 11.88 months, respectively (P=0.046). Twenty-nine patients (40.8%) in the combination group underwent previous immunotherapy (15 of whom were in first line), and they also achieved good survival (median OS: 25.67 months). The adverse reactions in the combination therapy group were mainly associated with either anlotinib or ICI administration, and there was a low incidence of grade 3 adverse events, all of which were resolved after intervention or discontinuation. Conclusions: The combination of the multitargeting tyrosine kinase inhibitor anlotinib and PD-1 blockade demonstrated significant benefits as the second- and subsequent-line treatment in driver-negative patients with advanced LUAD, even in those who underwent previous immunotherapy.

Response of an HER2-Mutated NSCLC Patient to Trastuzumab Deruxtecan and Monitoring of Plasma ctDNA Levels by Liquid Biopsy.

HER2-targeted therapy is currently the subject of several studies in lung cancer and other solid tumors using either tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) or targeted-antibody-drug conjugates. We describe a 61-year-old female patient with HER2 mutated adenocarcinoma of the lungs who received chemo-immunotherapy, followed by trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) and third-line Ramucirumab/Docetaxel at disease progression. Plasma ctDNA monitoring was obtained at 12 timepoints during therapy and revealed HER2 mutation allele frequencies that corresponded to the clinical course of disease. HER2-targeted T-DXd therapy resulted in a profound clinical response and may be an option for NSCLC patients carrying an activated HER2 mutation. Longitudinal liquid biopsy quantification of the underlying driver alteration can serve as a powerful diagnostic tool to monitor course of therapy.

Older patients with EGFR mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer treated with afatinib in clinical practice: A subset analysis of the non-interventional GIDEON study.

INTRODUCTION: Lung cancer is most common in older patients; despite this, older patients are historically under-represented in clinical studies. Here we present data from GIDEON, a study undertaken in Germany in patients with epidermal growth factor receptor mutation-positive (EGFRm+) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) receiving first-line afatinib. GIDEON enrolled a high proportion of patients aged ≥70 years, providing an opportunity to study afatinib use in older patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In GIDEON (NCT02047903), a prospective non-interventional study, patients with EGFRm+ NSCLC received first-line afatinib in routine clinical practice until disease progression, death or intolerable adverse events. Key objectives were twelve-month progression-free survival (PFS) rate and objective response rate (ORR). Overall survival (OS) and safety were also assessed. This post hoc analysis explores outcomes of patients grouped by age (≥70 and <70 years). RESULTS: In the 152 patients enrolled in GIDEON (69.7% female, 64.5%/22.4%/13.2% with Del19/L858R/other exon 18-21 mutations, 33.6% with brain metastases), the median age was 67 years (range 38-89) and 43.4% were aged ≥70 years. In the ≥70 years age group and the <70 years age group, twelve-month PFS rate was 58.9% and 43.9%, median PFS was 17.2 months and 10.6 months, ORR was 72.0% and 76.5%, twelve-month OS rate was 79.1% and 79.2%, 24-month OS rate was 52.0% and 61.7%, and median OS was 30.4 months and 27.4 months, respectively. In the ≥70 years age group and the <70 years age group, grade ≥3 adverse drug reactions (ADRs) were observed in 34.8% and 40.7% of patients, respectively; the most common were diarrhea (13.6% and 14.0%), acneiform dermatitis (7.6% and 7.0%), stomatitis (1.5% and 4.7%) and maculopapular rash (1.5% and 4.7%). DISCUSSION: Patients with EGFRm+ NSCLC aged ≥70 years showed clinical benefit from first-line afatinib with no unexpected safety signals, supporting the use of afatinib in this setting.

Combination of the platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio and fibrinogen may predict 5-year overall survival of patient in non-small cell lung cancer treated with surgery.

Background: Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a major type of lung cancer with high incidence and mortality. Systemic inflammatory response (SIR) and an imbalance of the coagulation system are both associated with the tumor progression. However, few studies have investigated the prognostic utility of a combination of inflammation and the coagulation system in NSCLC. The combination of platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) and fibrinogen (FIB) (PLR-FIB; defined as PLR × FIB) is an indicator reflecting SIR and coagulation concurrently, which have potentiality to predict prognosis of NSCLC. Methods: This retrospective, single-center study included 314 NSCLC patients with surgery. According to a cutoff value for the PLR-FIB, we divided participants into a low-PLR-FIB group and a high-PLR-FIB group. We retrospectively collected the data on 314 patients and used univariate and multivariate analyses to investigate the relationship between the PLR-FIB and survival. Results: Univariate analysis showed that adenosquamous carcinoma (ASC) (P=0.002), high PLR-FIB (P=0.023), and tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) stage III-IV (P<0.001) were associated with a poor outcome. On multivariate analysis, low PLR-FIB [hazard ratio (HR), 0.587; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.359-0.985; P=0.044], and TNM stage I-II (HR, 0.380; 95% CI: 0.245-0.590; P<0.001) were independent factors of a better prognosis. ASC type was an independent prognostic factor of poor outcome (HR, 5.513; 95% CI: 1.895-16.034; P=0.002). There were no significant differences in patient demographics or clinical characteristics between the two PLR-FIB groups (P>0.05). The 5-year overall survival (OS) rates were 80.8% and 67.9% for the low-PLR-FIB group and high-PLR-FIB group, respectively (P=0.02). Conclusions: Preoperative PLR-FIB was found to be an independent prognostic factor for 5-year overall survival in patients with NSCLC treated with surgery.

The impact of TP53 co-mutations and immunologic microenvironment on outcome of lung cancer with EGFR exon 20 insertions.

BACKGROUND: EGFR exon20 insertions (ex20ins) are targeted by novel compounds in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, data about outcome under conventional therapies and the influence of molecular features are scarce. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analysed 118 patients with evaluation of radiologic response based on RECIST v1.1. TP53 status was available for 88 cases. RESULTS: Platinum doublets and chemoimmunotherapy showed similar response rates (20-25%), disease control rates (80%) and median progression-free survival (mPFS, ≈7 months), which were longer compared to monochemotherapy (9%, 59%, 4.1 months), EGFR inhibitors (0%, 46%, 3.0) and PD-(L)1 inhibitors (0%, 30%, 2.1; p < 0.05). Overall survival (OS) was not dependent on the choice of first-line treatment, but related to more lines of systemic therapy (p < 0.05). TP53 mutations and brain metastases were associated with shorter PFS under platinum doublets and EGFR inhibitors (HR 3.3-6.1, p < 0.01), and shorter OS for patients receiving both treatments (p < 0.05). More tumour CD8+ and less Th1 cells were associated with longer OS independent of brain and TP53 status (p < 0.01). No difference in outcome was noted according to the ex20ins site and use of pemetrexed (vs. other cytotoxics) or bevacizumab. Long-lasting responses (>1 year) occasionally occurred under EGFR inhibitors for both 'near-' and 'far-loop' variants. CONCLUSIONS: Platinum doublets and chemoimmunotherapy have the highest activity with ORR of 20-25% and mPFS of approximately 7 months, regardless of the cytotoxic partner, while PD-(L)1 inhibitors show limited efficacy. TP53 mutations, brain metastases and a lower tumour CD8/Th1-cell ratio are independently associated with shorter survival.

A nomogram to predict the recurrence-free survival and analyze the utility of chemotherapy in stage IB non-small cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: Large part of patients of stage IB non-small cell lung cancer (IB NSCLC) may suffer recurrence after surgery. This study is to determine risk factors and establish a nomogram for postoperative recurrence and to provide a reference for adjuvant chemotherapy selection in patients with stage IB NSCLC. METHODS: A total of 394 patients with postoperative stage IB NSCLC who visited Fujian Medical University Union Hospital between January 2010 and June 2016 were selected. Patients were divided into training and validation cohorts based on the time of diagnosis. Independent risk factors were identified using a Cox proportional hazards regression model. A nomogram was created to predict recurrence-free survival (RFS) and was validated with an independent cohort. The predictive ability of the nomogram was evaluated using the concordance index (C-index) and calibration curve. RFS between the high- and low-risk groups was determined using Kaplan-Meier curves, and subgroup analysis of chemotherapy was performed. RESULTS: Visceral pleura invasion, micropapillary structures, tumor size, preoperative serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level, preoperative serum cytokeratin-19 fragments (Cyfra21-1) level, and postoperative histology were identified as independent risk factors for stage IB NSCLC recurrence. Discrimination of the nomogram showed good prognostic accuracy and clinical applicability, with a C-index of 0.827 and 0.866 in the training and validation cohorts, respectively. The difference in RFS between the high- and low-risk groups in both cohorts was significant (P<0.05). Finally, a significant difference was observed on whether high-risk group should accept postoperative chemotherapy (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: This nomogram can predict postoperative recurrence probability in patients with stage IB NSCLC, and can select patients with risk factors who need adjuvant chemotherapy.

Efficacy of docetaxel plus ramucirumab as palliative second-line therapy following first-line chemotherapy plus immune-checkpoint-inhibitor combination treatment in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) UICC stage IV.

BACKGROUND: Chemotherapy plus immune-checkpoint inhibitor (CTx+ICI) therapy has become the preferred 1st line treatment in patients with metastatic NSCLC without oncogenic driven mutations. However, the optimal subsequent 2nd line treatment is not defined and several alternatives exist. The purpose of this analysis was to evaluate the efficacy of 2nd line docetaxel plus ramucirumab (D+R) initiated after failure of 1st line CTx+ICI. METHODS: Retrospective data were collected during routine care from German thoracic oncology centers. Only patients who had received at least one course of 2nd line D+R were included. ORR, PFS, OS and numbers of courses of D+R were investigated with PFS after initiation of D+R being the primary endpoint. RESULTS: Seventy-seven patients met the inclusion criteria. 2nd line treatment with D+R achieved an ORR and DCR of 32.5% and 62.4%, respectively. Median PFS for 2nd line therapy was 3.9 months with a DOR of 6.4 months. Median OS of 15.5 and 7.5 months were observed from the start of 1st line therapy and 2nd line treatment, respectively. No unexpected toxicities occurred. Presence of KRAS mutations was associated with significantly worse median PFS to D+R (2.8 vs. 4.5 months in wild-type cases; P=0.021) and was an independent predictor of inferior PFS in multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: D+R is an effective and safe 2nd line treatment after failure of 1st line CTx+ICI irrespective of NSCLC histology. However, patients with a KRAS mutation did not benefit from D+R in terms of PFS and will require further investigations.

Predictive value of mRNA expression and dynamic changes from immune related biomarkers in liquid biopsies before and after start of pembrolizumab in stage IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to determine whether mRNA expressions and dynamic changes of immune-related genes before and after starting first-line treatment with the PD-1 inhibitor pembrolizumab in patients with NSCLC were of predictive value. METHODS: CD3, CD8, PD-1, PD-L1 and CTLA-4 mRNA expression levels were measured from peripheral blood before and after three weeks of treatment with the PD-1 inhibitor. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed retrospectively. Response, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were determined. RESULTS: In univariate analysis an increase of CD3 and CD8 mRNA expression after the first cycle of pembrolizumab were each associated with improved PFS and OS. In contrast, patients with no change or with a decrease in CD3 and CD8 mRNA expression showed significantly worse outcome. CD8 mRNA increase remained an independent predictive factor for PFS and OS in the multivariate analysis with p values of 0.011 and 0.006, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: An increase of CD8 mRNA expression predicts favorable outcome after first line monotherapy with pembrolizumab, while no change or decrease might serve as an indicator of poor outcome and might give cause for early treatment escalation for instance by addition of chemotherapy or additional ICI treatment, e.g., against CTLA-4.

Clinically relevant prognostic and predictive markers for immune-checkpoint-inhibitor (ICI) therapy in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

BACKGROUND: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) either alone or in combination with chemotherapy have expanded our choice of agents for the palliative treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. Unfortunately, not all patients will experience favorable response to treatment with ICI and may even suffer from severe side effects. Therefore, prognostic and predictive markers, beyond programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression status, are of utmost importance for decision making in the palliative treatment. This review focuses on clinical, laboratory and genetic markers, most of them easily to obtain in the daily clinical practice. RESULTS: Recently, a number of prognostic and predictive factors in association to palliative ICI therapy have been described in NSCLC. Besides biometric parameters and clinical characteristics of the tumor, there are useful markers from routine blood sampling as well as innovative soluble genetic markers which can be determined before and during ICI treatment. Additionally, the level of evidence is noted. CONCLUSIONS: These factors can be helpful to predict patients' outcome and tumor response to ICI. They should be implemented prospectively in ICI based clinical trials to develop reliable algorithms for palliative NSCLC treatment.

Efficacy of Docetaxel Plus Ramucirumab as Palliative Third-Line Therapy Following Second-Line Immune-Checkpoint-Inhibitor Treatment in Patients With Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Stage IV.

BACKGROUND: Antiangiogenic agents have been shown to stimulate the immune system and cause synergistic effects with chemotherapy. Effects might be even stronger after immune-checkpoint-inhibitor (ICI) therapy. The purpose of this analysis was to evaluate the efficacy of ramucirumab plus docetaxel (R + D) as third-line treatment after failure of a first-line platinum-based chemotherapy and a second-line ICI treatment in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) stage IV. METHODS: Retrospective data were collected from 9 German thoracic oncology centers. Only patients who had received at least 1 cycle of third-line R + D were included. The numbers of cycles, objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were investigated. RESULTS: Sixty-seven patients met the criteria for inclusion. Third-line treatment with R + D achieved an ORR of 36% and a disease control rate (DCR) of 69%. Median PFS for third-line therapy was 6.8 months with a duration of response (DOR) of 10.2 months. A median OS of 29 months was observed from the start of first-line therapy with a median OS of 11.0 months from the start of third-line treatment. No unexpected toxicities occurred. CONCLUSION: R + D is a highly effective and safe third-line treatment after failure of second-line programmed cell death protein 1/programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD1/PD-L1)-derived ICI therapy irrespective of NSCLC histology. As there may be synergistic effects of second- and third-line treatments, this sequence is a very suitable option for patients not treated with first-line ICI. In addition, R + D should continue to be investigated as a second-line treatment option after failure of chemotherapy plus ICI in the palliative first-line treatment.

C-Reactive Protein (CRP) Levels in Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Response and Progression in Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Bi-Center Study.

BACKGROUND: Biomarkers for predicting response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) are scarce and often lack external validation. This study provides a comprehensive investigation of pretreatment C-reactive protein (CRP) levels as well as its longitudinal trajectories as a marker of treatment response and disease outcome in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) undergoing immunotherapy with anti PD-1 or anti PD-L1 agents. METHODS: We performed a retrospective bi-center study to assess the association between baseline CRP levels and anti PD-(L)1 treatment outcomes in the discovery cohort (n = 90), confirm these findings in an external validation cohort (n = 101) and explore the longitudinal evolution of CRP during anti PD-(L)1 treatment and the potential impact of dynamic CRP changes on treatment response and disease outcome in the discovery cohort. Joint models were implemented to evaluate the association of longitudinal CRP trajectories and progression risk. Primary treatment outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), while the objective response rate (ORR) was a secondary outcome, respectively. RESULTS: In the discovery cohort, elevated pretreatment CRP levels emerged as independent predictors of worse PFS (HR per doubling of baseline CRP = 1.37, 95% CI: 1.16-1.63, p < 0.0001), worse OS (HR per doubling of baseline CRP = 1.42, 95% CI: 1.18-1.71, p < 0.0001) and a lower ORR ((odds ratio (OR) of ORR per doubling of baseline CRP = 0.68, 95% CI: 0.51-0.92, p = 0.013)). In the validation cohort, pretreatment CRP could be fully confirmed as a predictor of PFS and OS, but not ORR. Elevated trajectories of CRP during anti PD-(L)1 treatment (adjusted HR per 10 mg/L increase in CRP = 1.22, 95% CI: 1.15-1.30, p < 0.0001), as well as a faster increases of CRP over time (HR per 10 mg/L/month faster increase in CRP levels = 13.26, 95% CI: 1.14-154.54, p = 0.039) were strong predictors of an elevated progression risk, whereas an early decline of CRP was significantly associated with a reduction in PFS risk (HR = 0.91, 95% CI: 0.83-0.99, p = 0.036), respectively. CONCLUSION: These findings support the concept that CRP should be further explored by future prospective studies as a simple non-invasive biomarker for assessing treatment benefit during anti PD-(L)1 treatment in advanced NSCLC.

Erlotinib treatment after platinum-based therapy in elderly patients with non-small-cell lung cancer in routine clinical practice - results from the ElderTac study.

BACKGROUND: In this prospective non-interventional study, the effectiveness and tolerability of erlotinib in elderly patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after ≥1 platinum-based chemotherapy were assessed. METHODS: A total of 385 patients ≥65 years of age with advanced NSCLC receiving erlotinib were observed over 12 months. The primary endpoint was the 1-year overall survival (OS) rate. RESULTS: Patients were predominantly Caucasian (99.2%), a mean of 73 years old; 24.7% had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) ≥2. Most common tumor histologies were adenocarcinoma (64.9%) and squamous cell carcinoma (22.3%). Of 119 patients tested, 15.1% had an activating epidermal growth factor receptor gene (EGFR) mutation. The 1-year OS rate was 31% (95% CI 25-36) with a median OS of 7.1 months (95% CI 6.0-7.9). OS was significantly better in females than males (p = 0.0258) and in patients with an EGFR mutation compared to EGFR wild-type patients (p = 0.0004). OS was not affected by age (p = 0.3436) and ECOG PS (p = 0.5364). Patients with squamous NSCLC tended to live longer than patients with non-squamous EGFR wild-type tumors (median OS: 8.6 vs 5.5 months). Cough and dyspnea improved during the observation period. The erlotinib safety profile was comparable to that in previous studies with rash (45.2%) and diarrhea (22.6%) being the most frequently reported adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Erlotinib represents a suitable palliative treatment option in further therapy lines for elderly patients with advanced NSCLC. The results obtained under real-life conditions add to our understanding of the benefits and risks of erlotinib in routine clinical practice. TRIAL REGISTRATION: BfArM ( https://www.bfarm.de ; ML23023); ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01535729; 20 Feb 2012).

Comparison of PD-L1 mRNA Expression Measured with the CheckPoint Typer® Assay with PD-L1 Protein Expression Assessed with Immunohistochemistry in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Immunohistochemical (IHC) assessment of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has become important since the development of anti-PD-1/-PD-L1 directed drugs. Various PD-L1 antibodies and cut-offs have been used in different trials to predict response to these drugs, thus comparison of those studies is difficult. We compared PD-L1 mRNA expression measured by RT-qPCR with PD-L1 protein expression evaluated by IHC. Moreover, we investigated the impact of different tumour tissue acquisition methods on the reliability of PD-L1 measurement techniques. MATERIALS AND METHODS: NSCLC cases (N=22), including n=9 mediastinal lymph node biopsies acquired by endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) and n=5 metastases, were evaluated prospectively for PD-L1 protein on tumor cells (TC) and immune cells (IC) using E1L3N and 28-8 antibodies and PD-L1 mRNA using the CheckPoint TYPER® assay. RESULTS: In primary NSCLC tissues, agreement between PD-L1 mRNA and TC staining using the 28-8 antibody was excellent (ĸ=0.85, p=0.0002). Comparing both PD-L1 antibodies against each other showed a kappa value of 0.58 (p=0.0106). In EBUS-TBNA, PD-L1 mRNA correlated perfectly with the 28-8 antibody (ĸ=1.0, p=0.0023). PD-L1 mRNA levels significantly differed when comparing 28-8 TC staining of tumours >49% with 1-49% and 0% (p=0.0040; p=0.0081, respectively). In metastatic lesions, differences between PD-L1 mRNA and IHC became apparent (ĸ=0.2, p=0.2525). CONCLUSION: Testing of PD-L1 mRNA and 28-8 IHC showed an excellent agreement in NSCLC samples including mediastinal lymph node biopsies. Since PD-L1 expression in >50% TC detected by 28-8 IHC can be reliably detected by RT-qPCR, quantitative PD-L1 mRNA determination should be considered as an alternative to IHC as there is no interobserver variability in RNA results.

Afatinib-associated Stevens-Johnson syndrome in an EGFR-mutated lung cancer patient.

INTRODUCTION: Afatinib is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), that has been approved for treating patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutated advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) related to EGFR directed TKIs is a rare adverse event. CASE PRESENTATION: We report a case of a 79-year-old white female with EGFR-mutated, metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer treated with afatinib as first-line palliative treatment, who developed a SJS after two months of treatment. Discontinuation of the TKI and systemic glucocorticoid treatment led to improvement of symptoms and recovery. CONCLUSION: Severe adverse cutaneous drug reactions that predominantly involve the skin and mucous membranes during treatment with afatinib should alert clinicians to suspect SJS and react appropriately.

SNAI2/SLUG and estrogen receptor mRNA expression are inversely correlated and prognostic of patient outcome in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: Epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) is involved in important malignant features of cancer cells, like invasion, metastatic potential, anti-apoptotic and stem-cell like phenotypes. Among several transcription factors, SNAI2/SLUG is supposed to play an essential role for EMT. METHODS: Paraffin embedded tumor samples from 63 patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer, enrolled in a randomized phase II trial, were prospectively collected, 53 samples qualified for further analysis. Automated RNA extraction from paraffin and RT-quantitative PCR was used for evaluation of SNAI2/SLUG, estrogen receptor 1 (ESR1) and matrix-metalloproteinases (MMP) mRNA expression. RESULTS: Clinical features like age, gender, performance status, histological subtype and stage were similarly distributed among SNAI2/SLUG positive and negative patients. SNAI2/SLUG was significantly, inversely correlated with ESR1 mRNA expression (p < 0.0001). In contrast, MMP2 (p = 0.387), MMP7 (p = 0.396) and MMP9 mRNA expression (p = 0.366) did not correlate with SNAI2/SLUG. Patients with high SNAI2/SLUG expression (grouped by median expression) had a worse outcome. Median overall survival in patients with high SNAI2/SLUG expression was 5.7 months versus 11.6 months with low SNAI2/SLUG expression (p = .038). Inversely, patients with high ESR1 expression (grouped by median expression) had an improved median OS with 10.9 months vs. 5.0 months in the low expression group (p = .032). In multivariate analysis, SNAI2/SLUG2 (p = .022) and ESR1 (p = .017) separately were independent prognostic factors for survival. CONCLUSION: SNAI2/SLUG is prognostic of patients' outcome. The strong inverse correlation with ESR1 indicates a significant impact of estrogen receptor pathway regarding these malignant features.

Comparability of microarray data between amplified and non amplified RNA in colorectal carcinoma.

Microarray analysis reaches increasing popularity during the investigation of prognostic gene clusters in oncology. The standardisation of technical procedures will be essential to compare various datasets produced by different research groups. In several projects the amount of available tissue is limited. In such cases the preamplification of RNA might be necessary prior to microarray hybridisation. To evaluate the comparability of microarray results generated either by amplified or non amplified RNA we isolated RNA from colorectal cancer samples (stage UICC IV) following tumour tissue enrichment by macroscopic manual dissection (CMD). One part of the RNA was directly labelled and hybridised to GeneChips (HG-U133A, Affymetrix), the other part of the RNA was amplified according to the "Eberwine" protocol and was then hybridised to the microarrays. During unsupervised hierarchical clustering the samples were divided in groups regarding the RNA pre-treatment and 5.726 differentially expressed genes were identified. Using independent microarray data of 31 amplified vs. 24 non amplified RNA samples from colon carcinomas (stage UICC III) in a set of 50 predictive genes we validated the amplification bias. In conclusion microarray data resulting from different pre-processing regarding RNA pre-amplification can not be compared within one analysis.