ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To analyse the 10-year outcomes of 64 patients with non-HBV polyarteritis nodosa (PAN) or microscopic polyangiitis (MPA) and Five-Factor Score-defined poor-prognosis factors enrolled (1994-2000) in the prospective, randomised, open-label CHUSPAN trial. METHODS: The 64 patients were randomised to receive 12 (33: 23 MPA, 10 PAN) or 6 (31: 17 MPA, 14 PAN) cyclophosphamide (CYC) pulses combined with glucocorticoids. Ten-year follow-up of these patients included times to relapse(s), failure(s) and/or deaths calculated from treatment onset. Data were censored after 120 months of follow-up. RESULTS: Eleven patients were lost to-follow-up (mean±SD follow-up: 61.9±35.2 months), with no between-group difference. As previously reported, baseline clinical characteristics and laboratory values were comparable for the 2 groups. After induction, 53/64 (83%) entered remission, with comparable percentages for both groups. The regimen was intensified for 11 initial non-responders: 4 achieved remission and 8 died before doing so. During extended follow-up, 26 patients experienced ≥1 relapse(s): 12 in the 12-pulse group and 14 in the 6-pulse group (p=0.47). At 10 years, overall and disease-free survival rates were 57.4% and 29.9%, with no between-group differences (p=0.185 and p=0.367, respectively). Factors associated with shorter disease-free survival were age ≥65 years and alveolar haemorrhage at diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: Although the 3-year CHUSPAN trial results indicated the superiority of 12 vs. 6 CYC pulses, that early advantage progressively declined and became non-significant by 10 years.
Subject(s)
Cyclophosphamide/administration & dosage , Glucocorticoids/administration & dosage , Immunosuppressive Agents/administration & dosage , Microscopic Polyangiitis/drug therapy , Polyarteritis Nodosa/drug therapy , Adult , Aged , Belgium , Cyclophosphamide/adverse effects , Disease Progression , Disease-Free Survival , Drug Therapy, Combination , Female , France , Glucocorticoids/adverse effects , Humans , Immunosuppressive Agents/adverse effects , Male , Microscopic Polyangiitis/diagnosis , Microscopic Polyangiitis/mortality , Middle Aged , Polyarteritis Nodosa/diagnosis , Polyarteritis Nodosa/mortality , Prospective Studies , Pulse Therapy, Drug , Recurrence , Remission Induction , Time Factors , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Because the optimal cyclophosphamide (CY) treatment duration for severe polyarteritis nodosa (PAN) without virus infection and microscopic polyangiitis (MPA) has not been established, we conducted a trial to compare the effectiveness of 6 versus 12 CY pulses given in combination with corticosteroids (CS). METHODS: Sixty-five (18 PAN, 47 MPA) previously untreated patients were randomized to receive 12 (n = 34) or 6 (n = 31) CY pulses combined with CS. PAN and MPA were histologically proven or met ACR criteria. All patients presented >or=1 factor of severity according to the five factor score (FFS). CY pulses were administered every 2 weeks for 1 month, then every 4 weeks. The end point of the study was the number of events (relapses and/or deaths) occurring in each group, analyzed according to an intention-to-treat strategy. The outcome was evaluated by Cox proportional hazards analysis. RESULTS: The baseline characteristics were similar for both groups. The mean (+/- SD) followup was 32 +/- 21 months. Survival analysis showed a significantly lower relapse probability (P = 0.02; hazards ratio [HR] = 0.34) and higher event-free survival (P = 0.02, HR = 0.44) for the 12 CY-pulse group while the mortality rates were not significantly different (P = 0.47). CONCLUSION: These results suggest that 6 CY pulses are less effective than 12 CY pulses to treat severe PAN and MPA, particularly with respect to the risk of relapses.
