Evaluating the effects of polices on nursing care as promoted by the Veneto region: the research protocol and its implications for public health.

Study design: Multi-centre mixed-method study design organised into several phases. Background: The Veneto region has recently defined a set of policies on nursing care by determining the needed amount of daily care in minutes and by initiating a systematic measurement of nursing outcomes; also, with a more recent policy, missed nursing care (MNC) has been established as a process measure of interest. To measure the effect of these policies, a research protocol - aimed at evaluating several end points - has been designed, involving a large target population and hospital units. The aim of this manuscript is to briefly present the research protocol and to discuss the public health implications of its expected end-points. Methods: The endpoints of the protocol are: (a) to describe the frequency of MNC as perceived by nurses; (b) to identify contributing factors; (c) to identify practices adopted in low-occurrence MNC units and to assess the effectiveness of implementing them in units with higher levels of MNC; (d) to explore the relationship between the amount of nursing care provided, MNC, and patient outcomes; and (e) to validate a tool that measures MNC as perceived by patients/caregivers. A total of 3,460 nurses, 5,000 patient/day and 160 nursing coordinators of the medical and surgical units of public hospitals in the Veneto Region will be included. Conclusions: Measuring the association between the amount of nursing care and patient outcomes, as well as evaluating the role of MNC as perceived by nurses and patients in hindering or increasing the risk of some patient outcomes can provide a body of evidence capable of further informing policies in the field, both at the national and at the international level. Moreover, emerging good practices capable of preventing or minimising MNC, sharing and implementing them in other units where high levels of missed care are reported and evaluating their effectiveness, can also inform public health policies.

Parents spend an average of nine hours a day providing palliative care for children at home and need to maintain an average of five life-saving devices.

AIM: This Italian study investigated home-based palliative care for young children and how long it took parents to meet their needs. METHODS: The study population consisted of 33 families with a child under the responsibility of the Veneto Regional Center for Pediatric Palliative Care, northern Italy, who needed medical support in at least two of the following areas: respiratory, feeding, pain and seizures. RESULTS: The children had a mean age of 6.8 ± 4.7 years. We found that 72% of the patients needed medical devices for feeding, 36% had a tracheostomy and 55% were on mechanical ventilatory support. The children needed an average of five different life-supporting medical appliances, and the time taken to provide for their care increased significantly with each additional appliance (p = 0.016). Their most time-consuming daily needs were feeding (174 minutes) and support when they woke up at night (67 minutes). The average daily time that parents spent taking care of their child amounted to eight hours and 54 minutes per day. CONCLUSION: Parents providing palliative care for children with life-limiting diseases spent an average of nine hours a day caring for them each day and had to maintain an average of five medical appliances.

Diagnostic and prognostic value of low percentage of glycosylated ferritin in acquired hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis: A single-center study.

INTRODUCTION: Hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) is an aggressive and life-threatening syndrome characterized by an excessive immune activation. Glycosylated ferritin (GF) level has been proposed as highly specific of HLH. METHODS: We have studied 12 subjects with HLH according to the HLH-04 trial criteria and 11 patients with a clinical and laboratoristic suspicion of HLH. The percentage of GF was measured by an in-house assay. RESULTS: The only biomarkers that were significantly different in the two groups were fraction of GF (P<.001) and the presence of hemophagocytosis in bone marrow (P=.006). Subjects with HLH had significantly lower percentage of GF than patients with other inflammatory conditions mimicking HLH. A fraction of GF ≤20% was strongly consistent with a diagnosis of HLH. CONCLUSIONS: Fraction of GF is useful to identify subjects at high risk for early death and therefore in need of early treatment.

High doses of benzodiazepine predict analgesic and sedative drug withdrawal syndrome in paediatric intensive care patients.

AIM: Critically ill children can develop withdrawal syndrome after prolonged analgesia and sedation in a paediatric intensive care unit (PICU), when treatment is stopped abruptly or reduced quickly. The aim of this study was to evaluate the incidence of withdrawal syndrome in patients after three or more days of analgesic or sedative drug therapy, using a validated scale. We also analysed the association between withdrawal syndrome and the patients' outcome and factors related to analgesia and sedation treatment. METHODS: This prospective observational study analysed 89 periods of weaning from analgesia and sedation in 60 children between October 2010 and October 2011. Of these, 65% were less than six months old and 45% were admitted to the PICU after heart surgery. Withdrawal syndrome was assessed using the Withdrawal Assessment Tool-1 (WAT-1) scale. RESULTS: The incidence of withdrawal syndrome was 37%, and the only variable that predicted its presence was the highest administered dose of benzodiazepine. The duration of weaning, Sophia Observational Withdrawal Symptom scale score and nurse judgment were also associated with positive WAT-1 scores. CONCLUSION: Withdrawal syndrome should be considered after three or more days of analgesic or sedative treatment. A high dose of benzodiazepine increases the risk of developing withdrawal symptoms.

Practice of analgesia and sedation in Italian Paediatric Intensive Care Units: did we progress?

BACKGROUND: No strong recommendation was reported in management analgesia and sedation of critically ill children. The present study was performed to describe the current practice of analgesia and sedation in Pediatric Italian Intensive Care Units, in order to evaluate the adherence to last published pediatric guidelines. METHODS: A questionnaire was sent to 24 Italian Paediatric Intensive Care Units during 2010. RESULTS: One Hundred percent of contacted centers returned the filled form. All Pediatric Italian Intensive Care Units used the same combination (opioid plus benzodiazepine); 50% of centers referred to regularly monitor the level of sedation, but only 37% of them used validate tools. Withdrawal syndrome was regularly monitored in 25% of contacted Pediatric Italian Intensive Care Units; Finnegan scale was the only adopted scale. CONCLUSION: National pediatric intensivists identified the same drug strategy to obtain analgesia and sedation in their patients, according to last published guidelines. Assessment of analgesia and sedation was more diffuse but not regularly performed and different methods were used. Withdrawal syndrome was monitored in a minority of contacted centres. Considering our data the practice of analgesia and sedation in Italian Pediatric Intensive Care Units is improved but not yet completely adherent to last international recommendations.

Assessing sedation in a pediatric intensive care unit using Comfort Behavioural Scale and Bispectral Index: these tools are different.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this paper was to monitor comfort in pediatric critical ill patients which is necessary to adequate analgesic and sedative therapy. The primary objective of this prospective observational study was to measure the level of sedation in a Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU) of a tertiary care Hospital, using Comfort Behavioural Scale (CBS) and Bispectral Index (BIS), evaluating the agreement between these tools; secondly we analyzed the correlation of an adequate level of sedation and patient's outcome. METHODS: We enrolled 46 patients, mechanically ventilated for almost 12 hours, monitored at a basal level and during a stimulus (tracheal suctioning). As outcome variables we analyzed: length of ventilation and PICU stay, duration of sedative therapy and weaning, time between beginning of sedative administration and start of weaning, presence of infection. RESULTS: Twenty-six percent (doctor CBS score), 34.8% (nurse CBS score) and 73.9% (BIS) of our population were found adequately sedated; none state of undersedation was reported. During the stimulus the percentage of adequately sedated patients according to CBS became 78.2%. CBS level of agreement versus BIS was weak. No significative difference was found between doctor and nurse CBS score. Length of PICU stay and duration of sedative administered were significant shorter in patients adequately sedated at Bispectral Index monitoring; no outcome variable resulted significant looking at CBS score. CONCLUSION: Our data support the risk of oversedation in critically ill patients and the difference between CBS and BIS, especially in evaluating light oversedation state. The presence of an excessive level of sedation evaluated by BIS was associated with duration of hospitalization and sedative administration.