Emergency front-of-neck airway by ENT surgeons and residents: A dutch national survey.

OBJECTIVES: ENT surgeons and anesthesiologists work closely together in managing challenging airway cases. Sharing knowledge, experiences, and expectations interdisciplinary is essential in order to facilitate decision-making and adequate management in emergency front-of-neck airway cases. METHODS: A survey was performed, to analyze level of experience, technique of preference, training, knowledge of material and protocols, and self-efficacy scores of Dutch ENT surgeons and residents in performing an urgent or emergency front-of-neck airway. RESULTS: Within one year (January 2014-2015), 25.7% of the 257 respondents had performed an urgent or emergency front-of-neck airway. Of all reported emergency front-of-neck airways (N = 30), 80% were managed by tracheotomy. In future emergency front-of-neck airway cases, 74% stated cricothyrotomy would be their technique of preference. The majority would choose an uncuffed large-bore cannula technique. Post-academic hands-on training was attended by 42% of respondents. Self-efficacy scores were highest for surgical tracheotomy, and higher when trained or experienced. In case of an emergency scenario, 8.6% would not perform a front-of-neck airway themselves. The main reasons for reluctance to start in general were lack of experience and lack of training. Reported items for improvement were mainly the development of a protocol and training. CONCLUSION: The chance of encountering an airway emergency scenario requiring front-of-neck airway is realistic. There is inconsistency between advised technique, technique of preference and technique actually performed by ENT surgeons. This study shows that there is both a need and desire for improvement in training and organization of care. Interdisciplinary guidelines and education is needed and could eventually safe lives. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 5.

Indications and results of emergency surgical airways performed by a physician-staffed helicopter emergency service.

BACKGROUND: Airway management is essential in critically ill or injured patients. In a "can't intubate, can't oxygenate" scenario, an emergency surgical airway (ESA), similar to a cricothyroidotomy, is the final step in airway management. This procedure is infrequently performed in the prehospital or clinical setting. The incidence of ESA may differ between physician- and non-physician-staffed emergency medical services (EMS). We examined the indications and results of ESA procedures among our physician-staffed EMS compared with non-physician-staffed services. METHODS: Data for all forms of airway management were obtained from our EMS providers and analyzed and compared with data from non-physician-staffed EMS found in the literature. RESULTS: Among 1871 patients requiring a secured airway, the incidence of a surgical airway was 1.6% (n=30). Fourteen patients received a primary ESA. In 16 patients, a secondary ESA was required after failed endotracheal intubation. The total prehospital ESA tracheal access success rate was 96.7%. CONCLUSION: The incidence of ESA in our patient population was low compared with those reported in the literature from non-physician-staffed EMS. Advanced intubation skills might be a contributing factor, thus reducing the number of ESAs required.