Vertebral level specific modulation of paraspinal muscle activity based on vestibular signals during walking.

Evoking muscle responses by electrical vestibular stimulation (EVS) may help to understand the contribution of the vestibular system to postural control. Although paraspinal muscles play a role in postural stability, the vestibulo-muscular coupling of these muscles during walking has rarely been studied. This study aimed to investigate how vestibular signals affect paraspinal muscle activity at different vertebral levels during walking with preferred and narrow step width. Sixteen healthy participants were recruited. Participants walked on a treadmill for 8 min at 78 steps/min and 2.8 km/h, at two different step width, either with or without EVS. Bipolar electromyography was recorded bilaterally from the paraspinal muscles at eight vertebral levels from cervical to lumbar. Coherence, gain, and delay of EVS and EMG responses were determined. Significant EVS-EMG coupling (P < 0.01) was found at ipsilateral and/or contralateral heel strikes. This coupling was mirrored between left and right relative to the midline of the trunk and between the higher and lower vertebral levels, i.e. a peak occurred at ipsilateral heel strike at lower levels, whereas it occurred at contralateral heel strike at higher levels. EVS-EMG coupling only partially coincided with peak muscle activity. EVS-EMG coherence slightly, but not significantly, increased when walking with narrow steps. No significant differences were found in gain and phase between the vertebral levels or step width conditions. In summary, vertebral level specific modulation of paraspinal muscle activity based on vestibular signals might allow a fast, synchronized, and spatially co-ordinated response along the trunk during walking. KEY POINTS: Mediolateral stabilization of gait requires an estimate of the state of the body, which is affected by vestibular afference. During gait, the heavy trunk segment is controlled by phasic paraspinal muscle activity and in rodents the medial and lateral vestibulospinal tracts activate these muscles. To gain insight in vestibulospinal connections in humans and their role in gait, we recorded paraspinal surface EMG of cervical to lumbar paraspinal muscles, and characterized coherence, gain and delay between EMG and electrical vestibular stimulation, during slow walking. Vestibular stimulation caused phasic, vertebral level specific modulation of paraspinal muscle activity at delays of around 40 ms, which was mirrored between left, lower and right, upper vertebral levels. Our results indicate that vestibular afference causes fast, synchronized, and spatially co-ordinated responses of the paraspinal muscles along the trunk, that simultaneously contribute to stabilizing the centre of mass trajectory and to keeping the head upright.

Three-dimensional freehand ultrasonography to measure muscle volume of the lumbar multifidus: Reliability of processing technique and validity through comparison to magnetic resonance imaging.

There is a growing interest in muscle characteristics of the lumbar multifidus related to low back pain, but findings between studies are inconsistent. One of the issues explaining these conflicting findings might be the use of two-dimensional measures of cross-sectional area and thickness of the lumbar multifidus in most studies, which might be a suboptimal representation of the entire muscle volume. A three-dimensional volumetric assessment, combined with standardized imaging and processing measurement protocols, is highly recommended to quantify spinal muscle morphology. Three-dimensional freehand ultrasonography is a technique with large potential for daily clinical practice. It is achieved by combining conventional two-dimensional ultrasound with a motion-tracking system, recording the position and orientation of the ultrasound transducer during acquisition, resulting in a three-dimensional reconstruction. This study investigates intra- and interprocessor reliability for the quantification of muscle volume of the lumbar multifidus based on three-dimensional freehand ultrasound and its validity, in 31 patients with low back pain and 20 healthy subjects. Two processors manually segmented the lumbar multifidus on three-dimensional freehand ultrasound images using Stradwin software following a well-defined method. We assessed the concurrent validity of the measurement of multifidus muscle volume using three-dimensional freehand ultrasound compared with magnetic resonance imaging in 10 patients with low back pain. Processing reliability and agreement were determined using intraclass correlation coefficients, Bland-Altman plots, and calculation of the standard error of measurement and minimal detectable change, while validity was defined based on correlation analysis. The processing of three-dimensional freehand ultrasound images to measure lumbar multifidus volume was reliable. Good to excellent intraclass correlation coefficients were found for intraprocessor reliability. For interprocessor reliability, the intraclass correlation coefficients were moderate to good, emphasizing the importance of processing guidelines and training. A single processor analysis is preferred in clinical studies or when small differences in muscle volume are expected. The correlation between magnetic resonance imaging and three-dimensional freehand ultrasound measurements of lumbar multifidus volume was moderate to good but with a systematically smaller multifidus volume measured on three-dimensional freehand ultrasound. These results provide opportunities for both researchers and clinicians to reliably assess muscle structure using three-dimensional freehand ultrasound in patients with low back pain and to monitor changes related to pathology or interventions. To allow implementation in both research and clinical settings, guidelines on three-dimensional freehand ultrasound processing and training were provided.

Best practice rehabilitation pathway for the management of single and double-level lumbar fusion surgery: a modified Delphi Study.

BACKGROUND: There is limited evidence to guide the rehabilitation of patients following single or double-level lumbar fusion surgery (LFS). This is reflected in extensive variability in current rehabilitation regimes and subsequent low clinical success rates, which urges a call for a consensus rehabilitation pathway. AIM: To establish consensus on the optimal pre-, peri- and postoperative rehabilitation of LFS. DESIGN: A modified Delphi Study. SETTING: Belgium and the Netherlands. POPULATION: A multidisciplinary panel of 31 experts in the field of LFS and rehabilitation participated. Nine patients validated the consensus pathway. METHODS: A three-round online Delphi questionnaire was followed by an in-person consensus meeting. In each round, experts could suggest new statements, and received group summary statistics and feedback for reconsidered statements. Consensus threshold was set at ≥75% agreement. The resulting rehabilitation pathway was validated by patients through an online questionnaire and subsequent in-person focus group. RESULTS: A total of 31 experts participated in the first online round, with 27 (87%) completing all online rounds, and 17 (55%) attending the in-person consensus meeting. Consensus was reached on 122 statements relating to pre-, peri- and postoperative rehabilitation of LFS, and validated by patients. Key components of the rehabilitation pathway included prehabilitation, education, physiotherapy in every phase, early postoperative mobilization, and little movement restrictions. Patients emphasized the need for support during the return-to-work process. CONCLUSIONS: This process resulted in 122 expert-consensus statements on best practice rehabilitation for managing LFS, validated by patients. CLINICAL REHABILITATION IMPACT: The proposed rehabilitation pathway can serve as guidance to support clinicians, reduce practice variability, and subsequently improve clinical outcomes after LFS.

Distinction of non-specific low back pain patients with proprioceptive disorders from healthy individuals by linear discriminant analysis.

The central nervous system (CNS) dynamically employs a sophisticated weighting strategy of sensory input, including vision, vestibular and proprioception signals, towards attaining optimal postural control during different conditions. Non-specific low back pain (NSLBP) patients frequently demonstrate postural control deficiencies which are generally attributed to challenges in proprioceptive reweighting, where they often rely on an ankle strategy regardless of postural conditions. Such impairment could lead to potential loss of balance, increased risk of falling, and Low back pain recurrence. In this study, linear and non-linear indicators were extracted from center-of-pressure (COP) and trunk sagittal angle data based on 4 conditions of vibration positioning (vibration on the back, ankle, none or both), 2 surface conditions (foam or rigid), and 2 different groups (healthy and non-specific low back pain patients). Linear discriminant analysis (LDA) was performed on linear and non-linear indicators to identify the best sensory condition towards accurate distinction of non-specific low back pain patients from healthy controls. Two indicators: Phase Plane Portrait ML and Entropy ML with foam surface condition and both ankle and back vibration on, were able to completely differentiate the non-specific low back pain groups. The proposed methodology can help clinicians quantitatively assess the sensory status of non-specific low back pain patients at the initial phase of diagnosis and throughout treatment. Although the results demonstrated the potential effectiveness of our approach in Low back pain patient distinction, a larger and more diverse population is required for comprehensive validation.

Reliability and agreement of lumbar multifidus volume and fat fraction quantification using magnetic resonance imaging.

INTRODUCTION: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the standard to quantify size and structure of lumbar muscles. Three-dimensional volumetric measures are expected to be more closely related to muscle function than two-dimensional measures such as cross-sectional area. Reliability and agreement of a standardized method should be established to enable the use of MRI to assess lumbar muscle characteristics. OBJECTIVES: This study investigates the intra- and inter-processor reliability for the quantification of (1) muscle volume and (2) fat fraction based on chemical shift MRI images using axial 3D-volume measurements of the lumbar multifidus in patients with low back pain. METHODS: Two processors manually segmented the lumbar multifidus on the MRI scans of 18 patients with low back pain using Mevislab software following a well-defined method. Fat fraction of the segmented volume was calculated. Reliability and agreement were determined using intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC), Bland-Altman plots and calculation of the standard error of measurement (SEM) and minimal detectable change (MDC). RESULTS: Excellent ICCs were found for both intra-processor and inter-processor analysis of lumbar multifidus volume measurement, with slightly better results for the intra-processor reliability. The SEMs for volume were lower than 4.1 cm³. Excellent reliability and agreement were also found for fat fraction measures, with ICCs of 0.985-0.998 and SEMs below 0.946%. CONCLUSION: The proposed method to quantify muscle volume and fat fraction of the lumbar multifidus on MRI was highly reliable, and can be used in further research on lumbar multifidus structure.

Rehabilitation to improve outcomes of lumbar fusion surgery: a systematic review with meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effectiveness of rehabilitation strategies on disability, pain, pain-related fear, and return-to-work in patients undergoing lumbar fusion surgery for degenerative conditions or adult isthmic spondylolisthesis. METHODS: Six electronic databases were systematically searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the effect of rehabilitation (unimodal or multimodal). The estimated effect size was calculated for interventions with homogeneous content using a random-effects model. Certainty of evidence was assessed by GRADE. RESULTS: In total, 18 RCTs, including 1402 unique patients, compared specific rehabilitation to other rehabilitation strategies or usual care. Most described indications were degenerative disc disease and spondylolisthesis. All rehabilitation interventions were delivered in the postoperative period, and six of them also included a preoperative component. Intervention dose and intensity varied between studies (ranging from one session to daily sessions for one month). Usual care consisted mostly of information and postoperative mobilization. At short term, low quality of evidence shows that exercise therapy was more effective for reducing disability and pain than usual care (standardized mean difference [95% CI]: -0.41 [-0.71; -0.10] and -0.36 [-0.65; -0.08], four and five studies, respectively). Multimodal rehabilitation consisted mostly of exercise therapy combined with cognitive behavioral training, and was more effective in reducing disability and pain-related fear than exercise therapy alone (-0.31 [-0.49; -0.13] and -0.64 [-1.11; -0.17], six and four studies, respectively). Effects disappeared beyond one year. Rehabilitation showed a positive tendency towards a higher return-to-work rate (pooled relative risk [95% CI]: 1.30 [0.99; 1.69], four studies). CONCLUSION: There is low-quality evidence showing that both exercise therapy and multimodal rehabilitation are effective for improving outcomes up to six months after lumbar fusion, with multimodal rehabilitation providing additional benefits over exercise alone in reducing disability and pain-related fear. Additional high-quality studies are needed to demonstrate the effectiveness of rehabilitation strategies in the long term and for work-related outcomes.

The Function Assessment Scale for Spinal Deformity: Validity and Reliability of a New Clinical Scale.

STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to develop and validate the Function Assessment scale for Spinal Deformity (FASD). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Spinal malalignment impacts daily functioning. Standard evaluation of adult spinal deformity (ASD) is based on static radiography and patient-reported scores, which fail to assess functional impairments. A clinical scale, quantifying function and balance of patients with ASD, could increase our insights on the impact of ASD on functioning. METHODS: To develop the FASD, 70 ASD patients and 20 controls were measured to identify the most discriminating items of the Balance Evaluation Systems Test and Trunk Control Measurement Scale. Discussions between experts on the clinical relevance of selected items led to further item reduction. The FASD's discriminative ability was established between 43 patients and 19 controls, as well as between three deformity subgroups. For its responsiveness to treatment, 10 patients were reevaluated 6 months postoperatively. Concurrent validity was assessed through correlation analysis with radiographic parameters (pelvic tilt; sagittal vertical axis [SVA]; pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis [PI-LL]; coronal vertical axis) and patient-reported scores [Oswestry Disability Index]; Scoliosis Research Society outcome questionnaire; Falls Efficacy Scale-International). Test-retest and interrater reliability were tested on two groups of ten patients using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). RESULTS: Patients with ASD, mainly with sagittal malalignment, scored worse compared to controls on FASD (P < 0.001) and its subscales. No significant improvement was observed 6 months postoperatively (P = 0.758). FASD correlated significantly to all patient-reported scores and to SVA and PI-LL. Reliability between sessions (ICC = 0.97) and raters (ICC = 0.93) was excellent. Subscales also showed good to excellent reliability, except FASD 1 on "spinal mobility and balance" between sessions (ICC = 0.71). CONCLUSION: FASD proved to be a valid and reliable clinical scale for evaluation of functional impairments in ASD. Objective information on function and balance might ultimately guide physiotherapeutic treatment toward improved functioning.Level of Evidence: 2.

Linear and Non-linear Dynamic Methods Toward Investigating Proprioception Impairment in Non-specific Low Back Pain Patients.

Central nervous system (CNS) uses vision, vestibular, and somatosensory information to maintain body stability. Research has shown that there is more lumbar proprioception error among low back pain (LBP) individuals as compared to healthy people. In this study, two groups of 20 healthy people and 20 non-specific low back pain (NSLBP) participants took part in this investigation. This investigation focused on somatosensory sensors and in order to alter proprioception, a vibrator (frequency of 70 Hz, amplitude of 0.5 mm) was placed on the soleus muscle area of each leg and two vibrators were placed bilaterally across the lower back muscles. Individuals, whose vision was occluded, were placed on two surfaces (foam and rigid) on force plate, and trunk angles were recorded simultaneously. Tests were performed in eight separate trials; the independent variables were vibration (four levels) and surface (two levels) for within subjects and two groups (healthy and LBP) for between subjects (4 × 2 × 2). MANOVA and multi-factor ANOVA tests were done. Linear parameters for center of pressure (COP) [deviation of amplitude, deviation of velocity, phase plane portrait (PPP), and overall mean velocity] and non-linear parameters for COP and trunk angle [recurrence quantification analysis (RQA) and Lyapunov exponents] were chosen as dependent variables. Results indicated that NSLBP individuals relied more on ankle proprioception for postural stability. Similarly, RQA parameters for the COP on both sides and for the trunk sagittal angle indicated more repeated patterns of movement among the LBP cohort. Analysis of short and long Lyapunov exponents showed that people with LBP caused no use of all joints in their bodies (non-flexible), are less stable than healthy subjects.

Factors Associated With the Ultrasound Characteristics of the Lumbar Multifidus: A Systematic Review.

OBJECTIVE: The first aim of this review was to investigate the association between age, sex, height, weight, physical activity level, posture, lumbar level and body side, and structural characteristics (cross-sectional area [CSA], thickness, linear dimensions, and echo intensity) of the lumbar multifidus (LM) measured by ultrasound. Second, differences between healthy individuals and patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP) were investigated. TYPE: Systematic review. LITERATURE SURVEY: PubMed, Embase and Web of Science were searched until September 2018. METHODOLOGY: Studies were included if (a) full text was available in English, Dutch, or French; (b) participants were older than 18 years of age and were asymptomatic or had nonspecific CLBP; and (c) the relation between structural characteristics of the LM, measured by ultrasound, and at least one of the above-mentioned factors was described, and/or a comparison between a CLBP and control group was made. Data were extracted independently by two reviewers. Quality of studies was assessed using an adapted version of the Downs and Black checklist. SYNTHESIS: Twenty-seven studies were included. Thickness and CSA of the LM do not correlate with age. Males have a larger LM size than females. Thickness and CSA of left and right LM are highly correlated in healthy subjects. More significant side-to-side differences are present in subjects with CLBP than in those without. Muscle size increases from proximal to caudal lumbar levels. The presence of CLBP is associated with muscle size and function. CONCLUSIONS: The association between the factors age, sex, height, weight, physical activity level, posture, lumbar level, body side, and presence of CLBP, and the ultrasound characteristics of the LM is discussed. These factors should be taken into account in future research on structural muscle characteristics, or when correlating with functional behavior or investigating the effect of a targeted intervention. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: I.

Differences in brain processing of proprioception related to postural control in patients with recurrent non-specific low back pain and healthy controls.

Patients with non-specific low back pain (NSLBP) show an impaired postural control during standing and a slower performance of sit-to-stand-to-sit (STSTS) movements. Research suggests that these impairments could be due to an altered use of ankle compared to back proprioception. However, the neural correlates of these postural control impairments in NSLBP remain unclear. Therefore, we investigated brain activity during ankle and back proprioceptive processing by applying local muscle vibration during functional magnetic resonance imaging in 20 patients with NSLBP and 20 controls. Correlations between brain activity during proprioceptive processing and (Airaksinen et al., 2006) proprioceptive use during postural control, evaluated by using muscle vibration tasks during standing, and (Altmann et al., 2007) STSTS performance were examined across and between groups. Moreover, fear of movement was assessed. Results revealed that the NSLBP group performed worse on the STSTS task, and reported more fear compared to healthy controls. Unexpectedly, no group differences in proprioceptive use during postural control were found. However, the relationship between brain activity during proprioceptive processing and behavioral indices of proprioceptive use differed significantly between NSLBP and healthy control groups. Activity in the right amygdala during ankle proprioceptive processing correlated with an impaired proprioceptive use in the patients with NSLBP, but not in healthy controls. Moreover, while activity in the left superior parietal lobule, a sensory processing region, during back proprioceptive processing correlated with a better use of proprioception in the NSLBP group, it was associated with a less optimal use of proprioception in the control group. These findings suggest that functional brain changes during proprioceptive processing in patients with NSLBP may contribute to their postural control impairments.

Neuroplasticity of Sensorimotor Control in Low Back Pain.

SYNOPSIS: Low back pain (LBP) is an important medical and socioeconomic problem. Impaired sensorimotor control has been suggested to be a likely mechanism underlying development and/or maintenance of pain. Although early work focused on the structural and functional abnormalities within the musculoskeletal system, in the past 20 years there has been an increasing realization that patients with LBP might also have extensive neuroplastic changes within the central nervous system. These include changes related to both the structure (eg, gray matter changes) and function (eg, organization of the sensory and motor cortices) of the nervous system as related to processing of pain and nociception and to motor and somatosensory systems. Moreover, clinical interventions increasingly aim to drive neuroplasticity with treatments to improve pain and sensorimotor function. This commentary provides a contemporary overview of neuroplasticity of the pain/nociceptive and sensorimotor systems in LBP. This paper addresses (1) defining neuroplasticity in relation to control of the spine and LBP, (2) structural and functional nervous system changes as they relate to nonspecific LBP and sensorimotor function, and (3) related clinical implications. Individuals with recurrent and persistent LBP differ from those without LBP in several markers of the nervous system's function and structure. Neuroplastic changes may be addressed by top-down cognitive-based interventions and bottom-up physical interventions. An integrated clinical approach that combines contemporary pain neuroscience education, cognition-targeted sensorimotor control, and physical or function-based treatments may lead to better outcomes in patients with recurrent and persistent LBP. This approach will need to consider variation among individuals, as no single finding/mechanism is present in all individuals, and no single treatment that targets neuroplastic changes in the sensorimotor system is likely to be effective for all patients with LBP. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2019;49(6):402-414. doi:10.2519/jospt.2019.8489.

Can Postural Instability in Individuals with Distal Radius Fractures Be Alleviated by Concurrent Cognitive Tasks?

BACKGROUND: Although impaired postural control may be a risk factor for distal radius fractures (wrist fractures), which often are caused by falls, little attention has been given thus far to the various performance and neurophysiologic aspects involved. Although studies suggest that external focus and cognitive tasks can improve postural control, it remains unclear whether these benefits are observed in individuals with a history of distal radius fracture and to what extent. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) To compare patients with a history of distal radius fracture to age- and sex-matched controls in terms of postural stability while standing on stable and unstable support surfaces, using both postural sway and neurophysiological measures as endpoints; and (2) to determine whether internal- and external-focus strategies and cognitive tasks can improve postural stability in these patients. METHODS: Forty patients with distal radius fracture (33 females and seven males with a mean ± SD age of 56 ± 4 years) and 40 sex- and age-matched control participants participated in the study. We recruited patients with a history of fall-induced distal radius fractures occurring between 6 and 24 months before the start of our study. We excluded patients who had any of the following: fear of falling, taking any medication that may affect balance, neurologic disorders, dizziness, vestibular problems, Type II diabetes, musculoskeletal disorders or recent history of lower extremity fracture, any recent surgical interventions in the spine or lower limbs, and/or cognitive impairment. Of 120 patients who were being treated for distal radius fracture over the 18-month period, 91 (76%) agreed to participate and 40 eligible patients were finally enrolled. The control group included sex- and age-matched (within 2-year intervals) individuals who had never had a wrist fracture. This group was selected from attendants/relatives of the patients attending the neurology and physical medicine and rehabilitation outpatient departments, as well as other volunteers with no history of balance problems or wrist fractures. To address our primary research question, we compared the postural control of individuals with a history of distal radius fracture with the control group while quietly standing on different support surfaces (rigid and foam surfaces) using both postural sway measures obtained by a force plate as well as neurophysiological measures (electromyography [EMG] activity of tibialis anterior and medial gastrocnemius). To address our secondary research question, we compared the postural sway measures and EMG activity of the ankle muscles between different experimental conditions (baseline, internal focus (mentally focusing on their feet without looking), external focus (mentally focusing on rectangular papers, placed on the force plate or foam, one under each foot), difficult cognitive task (recalling maximum backward digits plus one) and easy cognitive task (recalling half of the maximum backward digits). RESULTS: Patients with distal radius fractures presented with greater postural sway (postural instability) and enhanced ankle muscle activity compared with their control counterparts, but only while standing on a foam surface (mean velocity: 5.4 ± 0.8 versus 4.80 ± 0.5 [mean difference = 0.59, 95% CI of difference, 0.44-0.73; p < 0.001]; EMG root mean square of the tibialis anterior: 52.2 ± 9.4 versus 39.30 ± 6 [mean difference = 12.9, 95% CI of difference, 11.4-14.5; p < 0.001]). Furthermore, a decrease in postural sway was observed while standing on both rigid and foam surfaces during the external focus, easy cognitive, and difficult cognitive conditions compared with the baseline (for example, mean velocity in the baseline condition compared with external focus, easy cognitive task and difficult cognitive task was: 4.9 ± 1.1 vs 4.7 ± 1 [mean difference = 0.14, 95% CI of difference, 0.11-0.17; p < 0.001], 4.6 ± 1 [mean difference = 0.25, 95% CI of difference, 0.21-0.29; p < 0.001], and 4.5 ± 1 [mean difference = 0.34, 95% CI of difference, 0.29-0.40; p < 0.001] in the wrist fracture group). The same result was obtained for muscle activity while standing on foam (EMG root mean square of tibialis anterior in the baseline condition compared with external focus, easy cognitive task and difficult cognitive task: 58.8 ± 7.2 versus 52.3 ± 6.6 [mean difference = 6.5, 95% CI of difference, 5.5-7.6; p < 0.001], 48.8 ± 7.1 [mean difference = 10.1, 95% CI of difference, 9-11.1; p < 0.001], 42.2 ± 5.3 [mean difference = 16.7 95% CI of difference, 15.1-18.2; p < 0.001] in the wrist fracture group). CONCLUSIONS: The current results suggest that patients with a history of distal radius fractures have postural instability while standing on unstable support surfaces. This instability, which is associated with enhanced ankle muscle activity, conceivably signifying an inefficient cautious mode of postural control, is alleviated by external attention demands and concurrent cognitive tasks. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The findings of this study may serve as a basis for designing informed patient-specific balance rehabilitation programs and strategies to improve stability and minimize falls in patients with distal radius fractures. The integrative methodology presented in this work can be extended to postural control and balance assessment for various orthopaedic/neurological conditions.

Changes in the Organization of the Secondary Somatosensory Cortex While Processing Lumbar Proprioception and the Relationship With Sensorimotor Control in Low Back Pain.

OBJECTIVES: Patients with nonspecific low back pain (NSLBP) rely more on the ankle compared with the lower back proprioception while standing, perform sit-to-stand-to-sit (STSTS) movements slower, and exhibit perceptual impairments at the lower back. However, no studies investigated whether these sensorimotor impairments relate to a reorganization of the primary and secondary somatosensory cortices (S1 and S2) and primary motor cortex (M1) during proprioceptive processing. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Proprioceptive stimuli were applied at the lower back and ankle muscles during functional magnetic resonance imaging in 15 patients with NSLBP and 13 controls. The location of the activation peaks during the processing of proprioception within S1, S2, and M1 were determined and compared between groups. Proprioceptive use during postural control was evaluated, the duration to perform 5 STSTS movements was recorded, and participants completed the Fremantle Back Awareness Questionnaire (FreBAQ) to assess back-specific body perception. RESULTS: The activation peak during the processing of lower back proprioception in the right S2 was shifted laterally in the NSLBP group compared with the healthy group (P=0.007). Moreover, patients with NSLSP performed STSTS movements slower (P=0.018), and reported more perceptual impairments at the lower back (P<0.001). Finally, a significant correlation between a more lateral location of the activation peak during back proprioceptive processing and a more disturbed body perception was found across the total group (ρ=0.42, P=0.025). CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that patients with NSLBP show a reorganization of the higher-order processing of lower back proprioception, which could negatively affect spinal control and body perception.

Postoperative bracing after lumbar surgery: a survey amongst spinal surgeons in Belgium.

PURPOSE: Bracing is frequently prescribed following lumbar surgery for degenerative conditions. However, previous studies failed to demonstrate the advantage of postoperative lumbar bracing in both short- and long-term outcome in terms of pain, quality of life and fusion rate. The purpose of this study was to assess the prescription patterns and rationale for postoperative bracing amongst spinal surgeons in Belgium. METHODS: A 16-item online survey was distributed by email to spinal surgeons affiliated to the Spine Society of Belgium (N = 252). RESULTS: A total of 105 surgeons (42%) completed the survey. The overall bracing frequency following lumbar surgery was 38%. A brace was more often prescribed following the fusion procedures (52%) than after the non-fusion procedures (21%) (p < 0.0001). The majority of surgeons (59%) considered bracing after at least one type of lumbar surgery. Orthopaedic surgeons (73%) reported a significantly higher rate of prescribing postoperative bracing compared to neurosurgeons (44%) (p = 0.003). Pain alleviation (67%) was the main goal for prescribing a postoperative brace. A total of 42% of the surgeons aimed to improve fusion rate by bracing after lumbar fusion procedures. A quasi-equal level of the scientific literature (29%), personal experience (35%) and teaching from peers (36%) was reported to contribute on the attitudes towards prescribing bracing. CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative bracing was prescribed by Belgian spinal surgeons following more than one-third of lumbar procedures. This was underpinned by beliefs regarding pain alleviation and higher fusion rate. Interestingly, based on the scientific literature these beliefs have been demonstrated to be false. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

Sensor-based postural feedback is more effective than conventional feedback to improve lumbopelvic movement control in patients with chronic low back pain: a randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Improving movement control can be an important treatment goal for patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP). Although external feedback is essential when learning new movement skills, many aspects of feedback provision in patients with CLBP remain currently unexplored. New rehabilitation technologies, such as movement sensors, are able to provide reliable and accurate feedback. As such, they might be more effective than conventional feedback for improving movement control. The aims of this study were (1) to assess whether sensor-based feedback is more effective to improve lumbopelvic movement control compared to feedback from a mirror or no feedback in patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP), and (2) to evaluate whether patients with CLBP are equally capable of improving lumbopelvic movement control compared to healthy persons. METHODS: Fifty-four healthy participants and 54 patients with chronic non-specific LBP were recruited. Both participant groups were randomised into three subgroups. During a single exercise session, subgroups practised a lumbopelvic movement control task while receiving a different type of feedback, i.e. feedback from movement sensors, from a mirror or no feedback (=control group). Kinematic measurements of the lumbar spine and hip were obtained at baseline, during and immediately after the intervention to evaluate the improvements in movement control on the practised task (assessment of performance) and on a transfer task (assessment of motor learning). RESULTS: Sensor-based feedback was more effective than feedback from a mirror (p < 0.0001) and no feedback (p < 0.0001) to improve lumbopelvic movement control performance (Sensor vs. Mirror estimated difference 9.9° (95% CI 6.1°-13.7°), Sensor vs. Control estimated difference 10.6° (95% CI 6.8°-14.3°)) and motor learning (Sensor vs. Mirror estimated difference 7.2° (95% CI 3.8°-10.6°), Sensor vs. Control estimated difference 6.9° (95% CI 3.5°-10.2°)). Patients with CLBP were equally capable of improving lumbopelvic movement control compared to healthy persons. CONCLUSIONS: Sensor-based feedback is an effective means to improve lumbopelvic movement control in patients with CLBP. Future research should focus on the long-term retention effects of sensor-based feedback. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov NCT02773160 , (retrospectively registered on May 16th, 2016).

Association Between Sensorimotor Impairments and Functional Brain Changes in Patients With Low Back Pain: A Critical Review.

Low back pain (LBP) coincides with sensorimotor impairments, for example, reduced lumbosacral tactile and proprioceptive acuity and postural control deficits. Recent functional magnetic resonance imaging studies suggest that sensorimotor impairments in LBP may be associated with brain changes. However, no consensus exists regarding the relationship between functional brain changes and sensorimotor behavior in LBP. Therefore, this review critically discusses the available functional magnetic resonance imaging studies on brain activation related to nonnociceptive somatosensory stimulation and motor performance in individuals with LBP. Four electronic databases were searched, yielding nine relevant studies. Patients with LBP showed reduced sensorimotor-related brain activation and a reorganized lumbar spine representation in higher-order (multi)sensory processing and motor regions, including primary and secondary somatosensory cortices, supplementary motor area, and superior temporal gyrus. These results may support behavioral findings of sensorimotor impairments in LBP. In addition, patients with LBP displayed widespread increased sensorimotor-evoked brain activation in regions often associated with abnormal pain processing. Overactivation in these regions could indicate an overresponsiveness to sensory inputs that signal potential harm to the spine, thereby inducing overgeneralized protective responses. Hence, functional brain changes could contribute to the development and recurrence of LBP. However, future studies investigating the causality between sensorimotor-related brain function and LBP are imperative.

The development of the Dutch version of the Fremantle Back Awareness Questionnaire.

BACKGROUND: Disturbed body perception may play a role in the aetiology of chronic low back pain (LBP). The Fremantle Back Awareness Questionnaire (FreBAQ) is currently the only self-report questionnaire to assess back-specific body perception in individuals with LBP. OBJECTIVES: To perform a cross-cultural adaptation of the FreBAQ into Dutch. DESIGN: Psychometric study. METHODS: A Dutch version of the FreBAQ was generated through forward-backward translation, and was completed by 73 patients with LBP and 73 controls to assess discriminant validity. Structural validity was assessed by principal component analysis. Internal consistency was assessed by the Cronbach's alpha coefficient. Construct validity was assessed by examining the relationship with clinical measures (Numerical Rating Scale pain, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia). Test-retest reliability was assessed in a subgroup (n = 48 with LBP and 48 controls) using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), standard error of measurement (SEM) and minimal detectable change (MDC 95%) RESULTS: The Dutch FreBAQ showed one component with eigenvalue >2. Cronbach's alpha values were respectively 0.82 and 0.73 for the LBP and control group. ICC values were respectively 0.69 and 0.70 for the LBP and control group. In the LBP group, the SEM was 3.9 and the MDC (95%) was 10.8. The LBP group (ODI 22 ± 21%) scored significantly higher on the Dutch FreBAQ than the control group (ODI 0%) (11 ± 7 vs. 3 ± 9, p < 0.001). Within the LBP group, higher Dutch FreBAQ scores correlated significantly with higher ODI scores (rho = 0.30, p = 0.010), although not with pain (rho = 0.10, p = 0.419) or kinesiophobia (r = 0.14, p = 0.226). CONCLUSIONS: The Dutch version of the FreBAQ can be considered as unidimensional and showed adequate internal consistency, sufficient test-retest reliability and adequate discriminant and construct validity in individuals with and without LBP. It can improve our understanding on back-specific perception in the Dutch-speaking population with LBP.

The Effectiveness of Technology-Supported Exercise Therapy for Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review.

Various technological systems have been developed to assist exercise therapy for low back pain. The aim of this systematic review was to provide an overview and to assess the effectiveness of the available technology-supported exercise therapy (TSET) programs for low back pain. The electronic databases Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PEDro, IEEE, and ACM were searched until January 2016. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) using electronic technological systems simultaneously with exercise therapy for patients with low back pain were included. Twenty-five RCTs met the inclusion criteria. Seventeen studies involved patients with chronic low back pain, and electromyography biofeedback was the most prevalent type of technological support. This review shows that TSET seems to improve pain, disability, and quality of life for patients with low back pain, and that a standard treatment combined with an additional TSET program might be superior to a standard treatment alone. However, TSET seems not more effective compared to other interventions or a placebo intervention for improving these outcomes, which may partially be explained by the analytical approach of the current TSET-programs. For most technologies, only a limited number of RCTs are available, making it difficult to draw firm conclusions about the effectiveness of individual technological systems.