Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
BMC Biol ; 22(1): 58, 2024 Mar 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38468285

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Cell differentiation requires the integration of two opposite processes, a stabilizing cellular memory, especially at the transcriptional scale, and a burst of gene expression variability which follows the differentiation induction. Therefore, the actual capacity of a cell to undergo phenotypic change during a differentiation process relies upon a modification in this balance which favors change-inducing gene expression variability. However, there are no experimental data providing insight on how fast the transcriptomes of identical cells would diverge on the scale of the very first two cell divisions during the differentiation process. RESULTS: In order to quantitatively address this question, we developed different experimental methods to recover the transcriptomes of related cells, after one and two divisions, while preserving the information about their lineage at the scale of a single cell division. We analyzed the transcriptomes of related cells from two differentiation biological systems (human CD34+ cells and T2EC chicken primary erythrocytic progenitors) using two different single-cell transcriptomics technologies (scRT-qPCR and scRNA-seq). CONCLUSIONS: We identified that the gene transcription profiles of differentiating sister cells are more similar to each other than to those of non-related cells of the same type, sharing the same environment and undergoing similar biological processes. More importantly, we observed greater discrepancies between differentiating sister cells than between self-renewing sister cells. Furthermore, a progressive increase in this divergence from first generation to second generation was observed when comparing differentiating cousin cells to self renewing cousin cells. Our results are in favor of a gradual erasure of transcriptional memory during the differentiation process.


Subject(s)
Gene Expression Profiling , Transcriptome , Humans , Cell Differentiation/genetics , Cell Division , Single-Cell Analysis/methods
2.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38411533

ABSTRACT

The repair of nasal septal cartilage is a key challenge in cosmetic and functional surgery of the nose, as it determines its shape and its respiratory function. Supporting the dorsum of the nose is essential for both the prevention of nasal obstruction and the restoration of the nose structure. Most surgical procedures to repair or modify the nasal septum focus on restoring the external aspect of the nose by placing a graft under the skin, without considering respiratory concerns. Tissue engineering offers a more satisfactory approach, in which both the structural and biological roles of the nose are restored. To achieve this goal, nasal cartilage engineering research has led to the development of scaffolds capable of accommodating cartilaginous extracellular matrix-producing cells, possessing mechanical properties close to those of the nasal septum, and retaining their structure after implantation in vivo. The combination of a non-resorbable core structure with suitable mechanical properties and a biocompatible hydrogel loaded with autologous chondrocytes or mesenchymal stem cells is a promising strategy. However, the stability and immunotolerance of these implants are crucial parameters to be monitored over the long term after in vivo implantation, to definitively assess the success of nasal cartilage tissue engineering. Here, we review the tissue engineering methods to repair nasal cartilage, focusing on the type and mechanical characteristics of the biomaterials; cell and implantation strategy; and the outcome with regard to cartilage repair.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...