Gestational diabetes mellitus: Impact of adherence on patient management and maternal-neonatal complications.

BACKGROUND: Gestational diabetes mellitus is a form of diabetes whose prevalence is constantly increasing, thus leading to a growth in the necessary resources and organization of diabetes and obstetric facilities. The literature suggests that adherence to diet and therapy in patients with GDM might be highly variable and only sometimes optimal, and that this suboptimal compliance might be associated with more complicated treatment management or some adverse perinatal outcomes. This study evaluates this adherence and the benefits of constant blood glucose monitoring regarding maternalneonatal complications. METHODS: We conducted a multicentre prospective observational study, including all patients diagnosed with gestational diabetes mellitus and aged ≥ 18 years, between January 2019 and November 2021. We measured patients' adherence by clinical diary monitoring (medical evaluation) and observation of data obtained from glycaemic control (glucometer analysis). Patients were divided into three groups the adherent patient group, the non-adherent patient group and the partially adherent patient group; then, we compared the groups to assess the impact of non-adherence on patients' health. RESULTS: 122 (46.9 %) were classified in the adherent group (AG), 91 (35.0 %) in the partially adherent group (PG), and 47 (18.1 %) in the non-adherent group (NG) out of a population of 260 patients. The AG and PG groups were associated with a RRR of 74 % (95 % CI:0.13-1.03, p = 0.057) and 32 % (95 % CI:0.25-1.84, p = 0449) in operative delivery, respectively. Finally, this study proved that full or partial adherence is associated with decreased insulin administration during labour in 67 % (OR=0.33 p = 0.038). CONCLUSION: The study showed that patients' adherence to diet and/or therapy proposed by the diabetologist could significantly influence optimal glycaemic control during pregnancy Better compliance may lead to a lower incidence of operative deliveries and insulin utilization during pregnancy and labour.

Safety and Appropriateness in the Management of the Treatment Pathway of Pregnant Women with Gestational Diabetes.

Gestational diabetes (GDM) is quite common during pregnancy, and its prevalence is rising because of the increased overweight and obesity rates. In patients with GDM, proper glycemic control, adherence to a suitable diet and antidiabetic treatments can reduce the likelihood of maternal-neonatal complications. For this reason, this study aims to assess the therapy adherence of pregnant women with GDM. Treatment adherence was assessed by both glucometer and diabetologist's analysis reported in the electronic medical record. Cohen's Kappa was used to assess the agreement between the two classifications. Moreover, a multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify potential risk factors for non-adherence to treatment. Overall, 287 patients were enrolled, and 271 were available for follow-up. Low concordance between the glucometer and the diabetologist's analysis was found, mainly due to the complexity of patients with GDM. Indeed, 46% of patients were classified as not adherent due to glucometer results and 42% based on medical assessment. This study highlights the importance of monitoring patients with gestational diabetes to assess and increase adherence to therapy properly.

Clinical use of a 180-day implantable glucose sensor improves glycated haemoglobin and time in range in patients with type 1 diabetes.

AIMS: This real-world study evaluated the changes in glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) and continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) metrics associated with use of the implantable 180-day Eversense CGM System (Eversense) in patients with type 1 diabetes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a prospective, multicentre, observational study among adult participants aged ≥18 years with type 1 diabetes across seven diabetes-care centres in Italy who had Eversense inserted for the first time. HbA1c was measured at baseline and at 180 days. Changes in time in range [TIR (glucose 70-180 mg/dL)], time above range [TAR (glucose >180 mg/dL)], time below range [TBR (glucose <70 mg/dL)] and glycaemic variability were also assessed. Data were also analysed by previous CGM use and by mode of insulin delivery. RESULTS: One-hundred patients were enrolled (mean age 36 ± 12 years, mean baseline HbA1c 7.4 ± 0.92% [57 ± 10 mmol/mol]). Fifty-six per cent of patients were users of the continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion pump and 45% were previous users of CGM. HbA1c significantly decreased in patients after 180 days of sensor wear (-0.43% ± 0.69%, 5 ± 8 mmol/mol, P < 0.0001). As expected, CGM-naïve patients achieved the greatest reduction in HbA1c (-0.74% ± 0.48%, 8 ± 5 mmol/mol). TIR significantly increased and TAR and mean daily sensor glucose significantly decreased while TBR did not change after 180 days of sensor wear. CONCLUSIONS: Real-world clinical use of the Eversense CGM System for 180 days was associated with significant improvements in HbA1c and CGM metrics among adults with type 1 diabetes. The study is registered on clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04160156).