Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Mil Med ; 173(1): 67-73, 2008 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18251334

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate obesity classifications from body fat percentage (BF%), body mass index (BMI), and waist circumference (WC). METHODS: A total of 451 overweight/obese active duty military personnel completed all three assessments. RESULTS: Most were obese (men, 81%; women, 98%) using National Institutes of Health (NIH) BF% standards (men, >25%; women, >30%). Using the higher World Health Organization (WHO) BF >35% standard, 86% of women were obese. BMI (55.5% and 51.4%) and WC (21.4% and 31.9%) obesity rates were substantially lower for men and women, respectively (p < 0.05). BMI/WC were accurate discriminators for BF% obesity (theta for all comparisons >0.75, p < 0.001). Optimal cutoff points were lower than NIH/WHO standards; WC = 100 cm and BMI = 29 maximized sensitivity and specificity for men, and WC = 79 cm and BMI = 25.5 (NIH) or WC = 83 cm and BMI = 26 (WHO) maximized sensitivity and specificity for women. CONCLUSIONS: Both WC and BMI measures had high rates of false negatives compared to BF%. However, at a population level, WC/BMI are useful obesity measures, demonstrating fair-to-high discriminatory power.


Subject(s)
Adipose Tissue , Adiposity , Body Mass Index , Military Personnel , Obesity/classification , Waist-Hip Ratio , Adult , Anthropometry , Female , Humans , Male , Military Medicine , Obesity/epidemiology , Obesity/physiopathology , Reference Values , Risk Factors , United States/epidemiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...