The influence of clinical and genetic factors on patient outcome in small cell carcinoma of the ovary, hypercalcemic type.

OBJECTIVE: Small cell carcinoma of the ovary, hypercalcemic type (SCCOHT) is an aggressive tumor, with long term survival at ~30% in early stage disease. SCCOHT is caused by germline and somatic SMARCA4 mutations, but the effect of the mutation type on patients remains unknown. Furthermore, the rarity of SCCOHT has resulted in varied treatment, with no standardized protocols. We analyzed 293 cases to determine the effect of treatment modalities and SMARCA4 mutations on patient diagnosis and outcome. METHODS: In 293 SCCOHT patients we collected information on age and stage at diagnosis, treatment modality (surgery, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and/or high-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell rescue (HDC-aSCR)), SMARCA4 mutation origin (germline/somatic), and overall survival. Cox analysis and log-rank tests were performed on 257 cases with available survival data. RESULTS: The strongest prognostic factors were stage at diagnosis (p=2.72e-15) and treatment modality (p=3.87e-13). For FIGO stages II-IV, 5-year survival was 71% for patients who received HDC-aSCR, compared to 25% in patients who received conventional chemotherapy alone following surgery (p=0.002). Patients aged ≥40 had a worse outcome than younger patients (p=0.04). Twenty-six of 60 tested patients carried a germline SMARCA4 mutation, including all patients diagnosed <15years; carriers presented at a younger age than non-carriers (p=0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Stage at diagnosis is the most significant prognostic factor in SCCOHT and consolidation with HDC-aSCR may provide the best opportunity for long-term survival. The large fraction of SMARCA4 germline mutations carriers warrants genetic counseling for all patients.

A survey of APC mutations in Quebec.

This is an 11-year survey of molecular analysis of APC germline mutations for the province of Quebec done at the Molecular Pathology Unit of the Jewish General Hospital which offers genetic testing for hereditary forms of colorectal cancer for the whole of Quebec province. We report on 47 unique mutations seen in 66 families affected with familial adenomatous polyposis. Of these unique mutations, 60% are short indels, 28% are point mutations, and 6% are whole exon deletions. The absence of founder mutations and the variety of mutations encountered reinforce the value of RNA-based testing and the need for gene dosage techniques such as multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification.

Pharmacokinetic interaction study between eslicarbazepine acetate and topiramate in healthy subjects.

OBJECTIVE: Combination therapy is frequently required in the management of epilepsy. The primary objective of this study was to investigate the pharmacokinetic interaction between eslicarbazepine acetate (ESL) 1200 mg once daily and topiramate (TPM) 200 mg once daily in healthy subjects. METHODS: Multiple-dose, open-label, one-sequence study in two parallel groups of 16 healthy male volunteers. After an 8-day treatment with ESL (Group A) or TPM (Group B), ESL and TPM were co-administered for 19 days. A bioequivalence approach based on a within-subject comparison was used to investigate a potential drug-drug interaction. End/start of treatment geometric mean ratios (GMR, %) and 90% confidence intervals (90% CI) were calculated for maximum plasma concentration (C(max)) and area under the plasma concentration-time curve over the dosing interval at steady-state (AUC(ss)) of eslicarbazepine (ESL major active metabolite), R-licarbazepine (ESL minor active metabolite) and TPM at Day 8 and Day 27. RESULTS: In Group A, eslicarbazepine GMR (90% CI) was 86.79% (81.06%; 92.94%) for C(max) and 92.70% (89.21%; 96.32%) for AUC(ss). In Group B, TPM GMR (90% CI) was 81.50% (77.48%; 85.89%) for C(max) and 81.81% (79.69%; 84.00%) for AUC(ss). The 90% CI of eslicarbazepine C(max) and AUC(ss) fell within the pre-specified bioequivalence range (80.00%; 125.00%), allowing it to be concluded that the extent of systemic exposure to eslicarbazepine was unaffected by the concomitant administration of TPM. The 90% CI for topiramate AUC(ss) was borderline in relation to the pre-specified bioequivalence range and topiramate C(max) fell outside the pre-specified bioequivalence range. Therefore, the extent of systemic exposure to TPM following co-administration with ESL was not formally bioequivalent to the extent of systemic exposure to TPM when TPM was administered alone. However, there was no difference between TPM elimination half-life following TPM co-administered with ESL and TPM administered alone (24.0 and 24.3 h, respectively). The bioavailability of R-licarbazepine was essentially bioequivalent. Two subjects discontinued due to adverse events. No clinical interaction appeared to be present in terms of adverse events when both drugs were given concomitantly. CONCLUSION: Concomitant administration of eslicarbazepine acetate 1200 mg once daily and topiramate 200 mg once daily showed no significant change in exposure to eslicarbazepine but an 18% decrease in exposure to topiramate, most likely caused by a reduced bioavailability of topiramate. No dose adjustment is required.

Triple-negative breast cancer: distinguishing between basal and nonbasal subtypes.

PURPOSE: Triple-negative (TN; estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and HER-2 negative) cancer and basal-like breast cancer (BLBC) are associated with poor outcome and lack the benefit of targeted therapy. It is widely perceived that BLBC and TN tumors are synonymous and BLBC can be defined using a TN definition without the need for the expression of basal markers. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: We have used two well-defined cohorts of breast cancers with a large panel of biomarkers, BRCA1 mutation status, and follow-up data to compare the clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical features of TN tumors expressing one or more of the specific basal markers (CK5/6, CK17, CK14, and epidermal growth factor receptor; BLBC) with those TN tumors that express none of these markers (TN3BKE-). RESULTS: Here, we show that although the morphologic features of BLBC are not significantly different from that of TN3BKE- tumors, BLBC showed distinct clinical and immunophenotypic differences. BLBC showed a statistically significant association with the expression of the hypoxia-associated factor (CA9), neuroendocrine markers, and other markers of poor prognosis such as p53. A difference in the expression of cell cycle-associated proteins and biomarkers involved in the immunologic portrait of tumors was seen. Compared with TN3BKE- tumors, BLBC was positively associated with BRCA1 mutation status and showed a unique pattern of distant metastasis, better response to chemotherapy, and shorter survival. CONCLUSION: TN breast cancers encompass a remarkably heterogeneous group of tumors. Expression of basal markers identifies a biologically and clinically distinct subgroup of TN tumors, justifying the use of basal markers (in TN tumors) to define BLBC.

Use of immunohistochemical markers can refine prognosis in triple negative breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Basal-like breast cancer has been extensively characterized on the basis of gene expression profiles, but it is becoming increasingly common for these tumors to be defined on the basis of immunohistochemical (IHC) staining patterns, particularly in retrospective studies where material for expression profiling may not be available. The IHC pattern that best defines basal-like tumors is under investigation and various combinations of ER, PR, HER2-, CK5/6+ and EGFR+ have been tested. METHODS: Using datasets from two different hospitals we describe how using different combinations of immunohistochemical patterns has different effects on estimating prognosis at different time intervals after diagnosis. As our baseline, we used two IHC patterns ER-/PR-/HER2-("triple negative phenotype", TNP) and ER-/HER2-/CK5/6+ and/or EGFR+ ("core basal phenotype", CBP). RESULTS: There was no overall difference in survival between the two hospital-based series, but there was a difference between the TNP and non-TNP groups which was most marked at 3 years (76.8% vs 93.5%, p < .0001). This difference reduced with time, suggesting that long term survivors (beyond 10 years) in the TNP group may have comparable survival to non-TNP cases. A similar difference was seen if CBP was used instead of TNP. However when CK5/6 and/or EGFR expressing tumors were analyzed without consideration of ER/PR status, the reduction in survival increased with time, becoming more pronounced at 10 years than at 3 years. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggests that CK5/6 and/or EGFR expressing tumor types have a persistently poorer prognosis over the longer term, an observation that may have important therapeutic implications as drugs that target the EGFR are currently being evaluated in breast cancer.

Effects of food and formulation on the relative bioavailability of bismuth biskalcitrate, metronidazole, and tetracycline given for Helicobacter pylori eradication.

AIMS: To evaluate the effects of food and formulation on the pharmacokinetics of bismuth biskalcitrate, metronidazole and tetracycline when combined in a new 3-in-1 single capsule (BMT) for eradication of Helicobacter pylori. METHODS: In a randomized, 3 x 3 cross-over design, 23 healthy males received one dose of BMT in the fed and fasting states and equivalent doses of the three drugs given together but as separate capsules while fasting. Bioequivalence was evaluated according to 90% confidence intervals (CIs) of ratios of geometric least square means for C(max), AUC(t), and AUC(infinity). RESULTS: With respect to food, none of the three drugs met bioequivalence guidelines. Bismuth had lower limit CIs ranging from 12% for C(max) to 25% for AUC(infinity). The corresponding values for tetracycline were 59% and 51%. Metronidazole had a lower limit CI of 74% for C(max). With respect to formulation, bismuth had lower limits of CIs ranging from 39% for C(max) to 50% for AUC(t) and higher limits of 146% for AUC(t), metronidazole met bioequivalence guidelines, and tetracycline had lower limits of CIs between 72% for AUC(t) and 74% for AUC(infinity). CONCLUSIONS: Food significantly decreased the relative bioavailability of each drug but formulation was without effect. This decrease may be beneficial when a local gastric action is needed, as confirmed by a near 90% eradication rate when this combined capsule is administered with food to treat gastro-duodenal local infection by H. pylori.

Placental cadherin and the basal epithelial phenotype of BRCA1-related breast cancer.

PURPOSE: BRCA1-related breast cancer frequently has a basal epithelial phenotype, and P-cadherin is a basal marker. We undertook a detailed evaluation of the relationship among P-cadherin, prognostic markers in breast cancer, and outcome. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: This study was restricted to 292 cases of first primary invasive breast cancer diagnosed in Ashkenazi Jewish women between 1980 and 1995. All available blocks were stained for P-cadherin, and 261 were included in the final statistical analyses, including 27 germ line BRCA1 mutation carriers and 8 BRCA2 mutation carriers. Descriptive analyses were done followed by survival analyses and a Poisson regression analysis. RESULTS: P-cadherin was present in 80 of the 261 breast cancers (31%) and was more frequently present in tumors that have a basal epithelial phenotype [i.e., high-grade, estrogen receptor- and KIP1 (p27(Kip1))-negative tumors, with expression of cytokeratin 5/6, cyclin E, TP53, and presence of BRCA1 mutations and vascular nests (all P < 0.001)]. In a univariate survival model, expression of P-cadherin was associated with a relative risk (RR) of death from breast cancer at a 10-year follow-up of 2.9 (95% confidence interval, 1.8-4.7; P < 0.0001) and was a predictor of poor univariate survival in both lymph node-negative and -positive breast cancers. In a multivariate analysis, the effect of P-cadherin levels was not independent of other basal-related markers. Multivariable interaction modeling showed that P-cadherin positivity was highly predictive of a poor prognosis in small, node-negative breast cancers (RR, 7.1; P = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS: P-cadherin is a marker for basal-like breast cancers and is strongly associated with the presence of a BRCA1 mutation. It is an adverse prognostic factor, particularly in small, node-negative breast cancers.

The prognostic implication of the basal-like (cyclin E high/p27 low/p53+/glomeruloid-microvascular-proliferation+) phenotype of BRCA1-related breast cancer.

Previous studies have shown that BRCA1-related breast cancers are often high-grade tumors that do not express estrogen receptors, HER2, p27(Kip1), or cyclin D1, but do express p53 and cyclin E. In addition, the expression of cytokeratin 5/6 (CK5/6), indicating a basal epithelial phenotype, is frequent in BRCA1-related breast cancer. Here, in a series of 247 breast cancers, we demonstrate that CK5/6 expression was associated with nearly all of the features of BRCA1-related breast cancer and was also associated with a poor prognosis. In a parsimonious multivariable proportional hazards model, protein levels of cyclin E, p27(Kip1), p53, and the presence of glomeruloid microvascular proliferation all independently predicted outcome after breast cancer. In this model, only cyclin E and p27(Kip1) levels were independent predictors in lymph node-negative cancers, whereas glomeruloid microvascular proliferation and tumor size independently predicted outcome in node-positive disease. The molecular determinants of the basal epithelial phenotype encapsulate many of the key features of breast cancers occurring in germ-line BRCA1 mutation carriers and have independent prognostic value. Basal breast cancer deserves recognition as an important subtype of breast cancer.

Disruption of the expected positive correlation between breast tumor size and lymph node status in BRCA1-related breast carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: A positive correlation between breast tumor size and the number of axillary lymph nodes containing tumor is well established. It has been reported that patients with BRCA1-related breast carcinoma are more likely than patients with nonhereditary breast carcinoma to have negative lymph node status. Therefore, the authors questioned whether the known positive correlation between tumor size and lymph node status also was present in women with BRCA1-related breast carcinomas. METHODS: The relation between the greatest dimension of the resected breast tumor (size) and the presence of positive axillary lymph nodes (expressed as a percentage of all lymph nodes examined) was evaluated in 1555 women with invasive breast carcinoma who were ascertained at 10 centers in North America between 1975 and 1997. There were 276 BRCA1 mutation carriers, 136 BRCA2 carriers, and 1143 women without a known mutation (208 BRCA1/BRCA2 noncarriers and 935 untested women). Patients were stratified according to tumor size, and odds ratios were estimated for the presence of positive lymph nodes with increasing tumor size. RESULTS: A highly significant positive correlation between tumor size and the frequency of positive axillary lymph nodes was seen for BRCA1/BRCA2 noncarriers, for BRCA2 carriers, and for untested women (overall P < 0.0001 for each). In contrast, there was no clear correlation between tumor size and positive lymph node status in BRCA1 carriers (overall P = 0.20). CONCLUSIONS: The relation between tumor size and lymph node status in patients with breast carcinoma appears to be different in BRCA1 carriers compared with BRCA2 carriers and noncarriers. These findings have important implications for estimating the route of metastatic spread and for evaluating the effectiveness of early diagnosis in patients with BRCA1-related breast carcinoma.

Impact of germline BRCA1 mutations and overexpression of p53 on prognosis and response to treatment following breast carcinoma: 10-year follow up data.

BACKGROUND: Overexpression of p53 has been associated with poor survival following breast carcinoma. BRCA1 interacts biochemically with p53 and may also contribute to poor outcome when constitutionally mutated. The joint effect of both abnormalities has not been studied. The primary objective of this study was to assess the impact of germline BRCA1 mutations and p53 overexpression on survival after 10 years of follow-up. METHODS: A historical cohort of Ashkenazi Jewish women 65 years or younger with invasive breast carcinoma was tested for BRCA1 founder mutations. p53 overexpression was assessed by immunohistochemistry. Clinicopathologic information was obtained by chart review. RESULTS: In total, 278 women were analyzed. On univariate analysis, p53 overexpression (n = 63) was prognostic for worse overall survival (relative risk [RR] 2.6, P = 0.001) whereas BRCA1 germline mutations (n = 30) were of borderline significance (RR 1.9, P = 0.052). In the lymph node-negative subpopulation, BRCA1 mutation status conferred a higher mortality on univariate (RR 5.6, P < 0.001) and multivariate (RR 3.5, P = 0.03) analyses. There was a trend in favor of a worse prognosis for women who carried a germline BRCA1 mutation and whose tumor overexpressed p53. When compared with noncarriers, BRCA1 mutation carriers had a worse overall survival if they did not receive adjuvant chemotherapy (RR 3.3, P= 0.01) or adjuvant hormonal therapy (RR 2.3, P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Germline BRCA1 mutations and p53 overexpression carry a negative prognosis that is not additive to known prognostic factors. Given the experimental sensitivity of BRCA1-mutated cells to chemotherapy, the worse survival among BRCA1 mutation-carrying lymph node-negative breast carcinoma patients may be partly explained by the significantly lower proportion of lymph node-negative patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy (P < 0.001).

Oral contraceptives and the risk of breast cancer in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers.

BACKGROUND: Oral contraceptive use has been associated with an increase in the risk of breast cancer in young women. We examined whether this association is seen in women at high risk of breast cancer because they carry a mutation in one of two breast cancer susceptibility genes, BRCA1 and BRCA2. METHODS: We performed a matched case-control study on 1311 pairs of women with known deleterious BRCA1 and/or BRCA2 mutations recruited from 52 centers in 11 countries. Women who had been diagnosed with breast cancer were matched to control subjects by year of birth, country of residence, mutation (BRCA1 or BRCA2), and history of ovarian cancer. All study subjects completed a questionnaire about oral contraceptive use. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were derived by conditional logistic regression. All statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS: Among BRCA2 mutation carriers, ever use of oral contraceptives was not associated with an increased risk of breast cancer (OR = 0.94, 95% CI = 0.72 to 1.24). For BRCA1 mutation carriers, ever use of oral contraceptives was associated with a modestly increased risk of breast cancer (OR = 1.20, 95% CI = 1.02 to 1.40). However, compared with BRCA1 mutation carriers who never used oral contraceptives, those who used oral contraceptives for at least 5 years had an increased risk of breast cancer (OR = 1.33, 95% CI = 1.11 to 1.60), as did those who used oral contraceptives before age 30 (OR = 1.29, 95% CI = 1.09 to 1.52), those who were diagnosed with breast cancer before age 40 (OR = 1.38, 95% CI = 1.11 to 1.72), and those who first used oral contraceptives before 1975 (OR = 1.42, 95% CI = 1.17 to 1.75). CONCLUSIONS: Among BRCA1 mutation carriers, women who first used oral contraceptives before 1975, who used them before age 30, or who used them for 5 or more years may have an increased risk of early-onset breast cancer. Oral contraceptives do not appear to be associated with risk of breast cancer in BRCA2 carriers, but data for BRCA2 carriers are limited.

Risk of pancreatic cancer among individuals with a family history of cancer of the pancreas.

In a hospital based case-control study of pancreatic cancer in Ontario and Quebec, a total of 174 incident pancreatic cancer cases and 136 healthy controls were compared for their family history of cancer. Information regarding the ages and sites of cancer was taken for 966 first-degree relatives of the cancer cases and for 903 first-degree relatives of the controls. A total of 150 cancer cases were reported among the relatives of the cases, compared to 122 cases among the relatives of the controls (relative risk 1.15; p = 0.23). Pancreatic cancer was the only site statistically in excess in the case relatives, compared to the control relatives (relative risk = 5.0; p = 0.01). The lifetime risk of pancreatic cancer was 4.7% for the first-degree relatives of the pancreatic cancer cases. The risk was 7.2% for relatives of cases diagnosed before age 60, and was 12.3% for relatives of patients with multiple primary cancers (all ages). These individuals comprise a high-risk group for pancreatic cancer and might benefit from enhanced surveillance or chemoprevention. Familial site-specific pancreatic cancer appears to be a distinct genetic entity, but contributes only modestly to the total burden of pancreatic cancer.