Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Antimicrob Chemother ; 78(7): 1711-1722, 2023 07 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37248782

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Because NRTIs can have fetal toxicities, we evaluated a perinatal NRTI-sparing strategy to prevent perinatal HIV transmission. Our primary objective was to determine the proportion maintaining a viral load (VL) of <50 copies/mL up to delivery on darunavir/ritonavir monotherapy, without requiring treatment intensification. METHODS: In a one-arm, multicentre Phase 2 clinical trial, eligible patients in the first trimester of pregnancy on ART with plasma VL < 50 copies/mL received maintenance monotherapy with darunavir/ritonavir, 600/100 mg twice daily. VL was monitored monthly. ART was intensified in the case of VL > 50 copies/mL. Neonates received nevirapine prophylaxis for 14 days. RESULTS: Of 89 patients switching to darunavir/ritonavir monotherapy, 4 miscarried before 22 weeks' gestation, 2 changed treatment for elevated liver enzymes without virological failure, and 83 were evaluable for the main outcome. Six had virological failure confirmed on a repeat sample (median VL = 193 copies/mL; range 78-644), including two before switching to monotherapy. In these six cases, ART was intensified with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate/emtricitabine. The success rate was 75/83, 90.4% (95% CI, 81.9%-95.7%) considering two patients with VL missing at delivery as failures, and 77/83, 92.8% (95% CI, 84.9%-97.3%) when considering them as successes since both had undetectable VL on darunavir/ritonavir throughout pregnancy. In ITT, the last available VL before delivery was <50 copies/mL in all of the patients. There was no case of perinatal HIV transmission. CONCLUSIONS: Darunavir/ritonavir maintenance monotherapy required intensification in nearly 10% of cases. This limits its widespread use, thus other regimens should be evaluated in order to limit exposure to antiretrovirals, particularly NRTIs, during pregnancy.


Subject(s)
Anti-HIV Agents , HIV Infections , Female , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Pregnancy , Darunavir , HIV Infections/drug therapy , HIV Infections/prevention & control , Ritonavir , Treatment Outcome , Viral Load
2.
AIDS ; 36(9): 1273-1278, 2022 07 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35262533

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Widespread use of the measles vaccine should lead to the elimination of this disease. Here, we study the seroprevalence of measles in a cohort of adults living with HIV born after the introduction of measles vaccine in France and attempt to identify risk factors for the absence of serum measles antibody. DESIGN: In this multi-centre cross-sectional study, adult outpatients born after 1980 were screened for the presence of measles IgG antibody. Demographic and clinical data were obtained from the standardized electronic medical record system. Univariate and multivariate logistic regressions were performed to identify factors associated with the absence of measles antibodies. RESULTS: Between April 2019 and April 2020, 648 participants were enrolled. The median age was 33 years, 53.6% were born outside of France, and 74% were considered as socially deprived. Plasma HIV RNA was undetectable in 86% of patients. Among 603 evaluable patients, measles serology was positive in 87.2%. Only 81.8% of the patients with documented vaccination tested positive for measles IgG. Younger age was significantly associated with the absence of measles serum antibodies ( P  = 0.004 for each 10-year lower), as was birth in France ( P  < 0.001) and absence of social vulnerability ( P  = 0.04). CONCLUSION: The current study revealed a low seroprevalence of measles compared with that previously reported in France 6 years earlier and to the expected rate to achieve herd immunity. Checking vaccination record should be systematically carried out in patients living with HIV to fill the immunity gaps.


Subject(s)
HIV Infections , Measles , Adult , Antibodies, Viral , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , HIV , HIV Infections/complications , HIV Infections/epidemiology , Humans , Measles/epidemiology , Measles/prevention & control , Measles Vaccine , Seroepidemiologic Studies , Vaccination
3.
J Antimicrob Chemother ; 75(5): 1324-1331, 2020 05 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32157283

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Safety data about rilpivirine use during pregnancy remain scarce, and rilpivirine plasma concentrations are reduced during second/third trimesters, with a potential risk of viral breakthroughs. Thus, French guidelines recommend switching to rilpivirine-free combinations (RFCs) during pregnancy. OBJECTIVES: To describe the characteristics of women initiating pregnancy while on rilpivirine and to compare the outcomes for virologically suppressed subjects continuing rilpivirine until delivery versus switching to an RFC. METHODS: In the ANRS-EPF French Perinatal cohort, we included women on rilpivirine at conception in 2010-18. Pregnancy outcomes were compared between patients continuing versus interrupting rilpivirine. In women with documented viral suppression (<50 copies/mL) before 14 weeks of gestation (WG) while on rilpivirine, we compared the probability of viral rebound (≥50 copies/mL) during pregnancy between subjects continuing rilpivirine versus those switching to RFC. RESULTS: Among 247 women included, 88.7% had viral suppression at the beginning of pregnancy. Overall, 184 women (74.5%) switched to an RFC (mostly PI/ritonavir-based regimens) at a median gestational age of 8.0 WG. Plasma HIV-1 RNA nearest delivery was <50 copies/mL in 95.6% of women. Among 69 women with documented viral suppression before 14 WG, the risk of viral rebound was higher when switching to RFCs than when continuing rilpivirine (20.0% versus 0.0%, P = 0.046). Delivery outcomes were similar between groups (overall birth defects, 3.8/100 live births; pregnancy losses, 2.0%; preterm deliveries, 10.6%). No HIV transmission occurred. CONCLUSIONS: In virologically suppressed women initiating pregnancy, continuing rilpivirine was associated with better virological outcome than changing regimen. We did not observe a higher risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes.


Subject(s)
Anti-HIV Agents , HIV Infections , HIV-1 , Anti-HIV Agents/adverse effects , Emtricitabine/therapeutic use , Female , HIV Infections/drug therapy , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Pregnancy , Rilpivirine/therapeutic use , Viral Load
4.
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr ; 80(5): 574-584, 2019 04 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30649033

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether changing antiretroviral therapy (ART) during pregnancy because of concern about fetal risks led to poorer virological outcomes. METHODS: All pregnancies in women with HIV-1 infection enrolled in the national multicenter prospective French Perinatal cohort at 14 week gestation or more were included between January 2005 and December 2015, if the mother was on ART at conception with a plasma viral load <50 copies/mL. The reasons for a change in the ART were analyzed according to treatment guidelines at the time of the pregnancy and defined as for safety concerns in the absence of reported maternal intolerance. Virological and pregnancy outcomes were studied by survival analysis and logistic regression adjusted for a propensity score established for each patient according to baseline characteristics. RESULTS: Of 7079 pregnancies in the overall cohort, 1797 had ART at conception with a viral load <50 copies/mL before 14 week gestation. Of these, 22 changed regimens in the first trimester for intolerance, and 411 of the remaining 1775 (23%) solely for safety concerns. The proportion of change was higher when the initial treatment was not recommended in the national guidelines (OR adjusted: 23.1 [14.0-38.2]), than when it was an alternative option (ORa: 2.2 [1.3-3.7]), as compared to recommended first-line regimens. Treatment changes for safety concerns did not lead to poorer virological control, compared with pregnancies without such changes (19.3% vs. 15.6%, HRa: 1.0 [0.7-1.4]). CONCLUSIONS: Changing ART early in pregnancy to regimens considered safer for pregnancy, and neonatal health did not have a destabilizing effect on viral suppression.


Subject(s)
Anti-HIV Agents/therapeutic use , HIV Infections/complications , HIV-1/drug effects , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/drug therapy , Adult , Anti-HIV Agents/adverse effects , Drug Substitution/adverse effects , Female , HIV Infections/drug therapy , Humans , Infectious Disease Transmission, Vertical/prevention & control , Logistic Models , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Outcome , Pregnancy Trimester, First , Propensity Score , Prospective Studies , Survival Analysis , Viral Load/drug effects , Young Adult
5.
Transl Pediatr ; 6(1): 27-31, 2017 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28164027

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Antiretroviral therapy (ART) in HIV pregnant women has led to a dramatic decrease in the rate of HIV mother-to-child transmission but this benefit is counterbalanced with adverse effects related to in utero and neonatal exposure to ART. In 2013, some parents described neurodevelopmental disorders in their children. METHODS: A standardized letter was sent to the 133 women who delivered in Nantes hospital from 01/01/2003 to 31/12/2012 (167 births). RESULTS: Response rate was 33%. Over a 10-year period, 7 children had behavioral disorders and/or cognitive/developmental delay, 1 child had developmental delay + growth retardation and 2 experienced cancer. CONCLUSIONS: We found a significant association between neurodevelopmental disorders, preterm birth and exposure to 3 nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs). Further studies are needed and long-term follow-up into adulthood should continue.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...