Feasibility of a Comprehensive Wellness and Suicide Prevention Program: A Decade of Caring for Physicians in Training and Practice.

BACKGROUND: Comprehensive treatment models reduce distress and suicide risk in military, university, and community populations, but are not well studied with in medical trainees and physicians in practice. Physicians face unique internal and external barriers that limit access to psychological or psychiatric treatment, which may contribute to higher rates of burnout, depression, and suicide. OBJECTIVE: Our goal is to report on the feasibility and utilization of a wellness and suicide prevention program for residents, fellows, and faculty in an academic health center. METHODS: The program provides individual counseling, psychiatric evaluation, and wellness workshops for residents/fellows (N = 906) and faculty (N = 1400). Demand for services is demonstrated by the participation rate of eligible trainees. Acceptability within the target population is examined in a 2011 survey in which trainees (N = 116, 97% participation) and program directors (N = 23, 88% participation) rated their satisfaction. Start-up costs and funding sources to sustain a wellness program are outlined. RESULTS: Over 10 years, utilization of services grew from 5% in the program's first year (2004-2005) to a high of 25% of eligible trainees for 2013-2014, and faculty utilization grew to 6% to 8% for 2014-2015. Trainees and program directors reported a high level of satisfaction with this wellness program. Funding for clinic space and clinical staff is provided by the hospital via the graduate medical education budget. CONCLUSIONS: Increased utilization over 10 years, high satisfaction, and consistent institutional support suggest that this comprehensive model of care is feasible and valued.

Use of a voice and video internet technology as an alternative to in-person urgent care clinic visits.

This study aimed to determine the feasibility of patient-initiated online Internet urgent care visits, and to describe patient characteristics, scope of care, provider adherence to protocols, and diagnostic and therapeutic utilization. A total of 456 unique patients were seen via Internet-based technology during the study period, generating 478 consecutive total patient visits. Of the 82 patients referred for an in-person evaluation, 75 patients (91.5%) reported to the clinic as instructed. None of the 82 patients recommended for in-person evaluation required an emergency department referral, hospital admission or urgent consultative referral. We conclude that real-time online primary and urgent care visits are feasible, safe and potentially beneficial in increasing convenient access to urgent and primary care.

Generational influences in academic emergency medicine: teaching and learning, mentoring, and technology (part I).

For the first time in history, four generations are working together-traditionalists, baby boomers, generation Xers (Gen Xers), and millennials. Members of each generation carry with them a unique perspective of the world and interact differently with those around them. Through a review of the literature and consensus by modified Delphi methodology of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine Aging and Generational Issues Task Force, the authors have developed this two-part series to address generational issues present in academic emergency medicine (EM). Understanding generational characteristics and mitigating strategies can help address some common issues encountered in academic EM. Through recognition of the unique characteristics of each of the generations with respect to teaching and learning, mentoring, and technology, academicians have the opportunity to strategically optimize interactions with one another.

Post hoc mortality analysis of the efficacy trial of diaspirin cross-linked hemoglobin in the treatment of severe traumatic hemorrhagic shock.

BACKGROUND: The efficacy trial of diaspirin cross-linked hemoglobin (DCLHb) in traumatic hemorrhagic shock demonstrated an unexpected mortality imbalance, prompting a three-step review to better understand the cause of this finding. METHODS: Patients were enrolled in this DCLHb hemorrhagic shock study using 28-day mortality as the primary endpoint. Mortality data were primarily analyzed using the TRISS method and a nonblinded clinical review, followed by an independent Pennsylvania Trauma Outcome Study (PTOS)-derived probability of survival analyses. Finally, a trauma expert conducted a blinded clinical review of cases incorrectly predicted by these PTOS analyses. RESULTS: More of the DCLHb patients predicted to survive using TRISS actually died than in the control subgroup (24% vs. 3%, p < 0.002). Nonblinded clinical review noted that 72% of the patients who died had prior traumatic arrest, a presenting Glasgow Coma Scale score of 3, or a base deficit > 15 mEq/L. DCLHb patients predicted to survive using PTOS also more often died than did control patients (30% vs. 8%, p < 0.04). Blinded clinical review determined that 94% of the deaths were clinically justified. Both the TRISS and the PTOS models gave an adjusted mortality relative risk of 2.3, similar to the unadjusted risk data. CONCLUSION: Mortality analysis in this shock study involved both clinical case reviews and mortality prediction models. Despite the observation that nearly all of the deaths were clinically justified, the TRISS and PTOS models demonstrated excess unpredicted deaths in the DCLHb subgroup. A combined process, using both mortality prediction models and clinical case reviews, is useful in trauma studies that use a mortality endpoint.