ABSTRACT
Background: The aim of this study was to analyze the gamma-band frequency and motor performance of children with and without music training.Methods: This cross-sectional study included 31 right-handed children, 6-11 years old, who were allocated to two groups: 1) the music group (MG), including children who attended preschool and musical training (n = 16), and 2) the no-music group (NMG), including children who attended preschool but received no additional music training (n = 15). The outcomes were gamma-band frequency measured by electroencephalography, manual dexterity, aim-and-catch, and static and dynamic balance abilities measured by the Movement Assessment Battery for Children, and fine motor skills, overall motor skills, balance, corporal body scheme, spatial organization, temporal orientation, and general motor quotient (GMQ) by a Brazilian scale for motor development.Results: There 1was a significant difference between groups in the peak frequency (p = 0.0195) and median frequency (p = 0.0070) in the F3-F4 regions. Static and dynamic balance (p = 0.03), temporal orientation (p < 0.01), and GMQ (p < 0.03) were higher in MG than in NMG.Conclusion: The musically trained children had increased gamma-peak frequency in the frontal region and greater temporal orientation, balance, and the overall motor quotient.
Subject(s)
Music , Child , Child, Preschool , Cross-Sectional Studies , Electroencephalography , Humans , Motor Skills , MovementABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this review was to evaluate the effects of proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation (PNF) in individuals with Parkinson disease. METHODS: This was a systematic review. We searched for articles with the keywords "Proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation" and "Parkinson's disease." The databases searched were Scopus, ScienceDirect, Springer, Web of Science, LILACS (Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature), CINAHL (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature), the Cochrane Library, PEDro (Physiotherapy Evidence Database), SciELO (Scientific Electronic Library Online), Ovid, and PubMed, in addition to reference lists of relevant articles. All scientific articles published before November 2019 that addressed rehabilitative outcomes of PNF for individuals with Parkinson disease were considered. Two investigators independently screened studies according to the eligibility criteria. RESULTS: Of the 674 articles found, 6 were selected. The PEDro scores of 2 articles were 3 points, and the others scored 7, 8, and 9 points. The meta-analysis investigated 3 articles with the same outcomes: walking speed, stride length, and cadence. We found a statistical difference between PNF and other therapies for gait speed (Mâ¯=â¯0.28, 95% confidence intervalâ¯=â¯0.21-0.34, P < .001). CONCLUSION: Based on the meta-analysis, we found that PNF is similar or superior to other therapies as relates to gait speed. The efficacy of PNF for indications of Parkinson disease, however, requires further investigation, as a sufficient number of qualified, well-designed, randomized controlled studies is lacking.
