HIV care retention in three multi-month ART dispensing: a retrospective cohort study in Mozambique.

OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the effect of three multimonth dispensing (3MMD) of antiretroviral therapy (ART) on HIV care retention in southern Mozambique. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. METHODS: We analyzed routine health data from people with HIV (PWH) aged 10 years old and older who started ART between January 2018 and March 2021. Individuals were followed until December 2021. Cox proportional-hazards models were used to compare attrition (lost to follow-up, death, and transfer out) between 3MMD and monthly ART dispensing. Results were stratified by time on ART before 3MMD enrolment: 'early enrollers' (<6 months on ART) and 'established enrollers' (≥6 months on ART), and age groups: adolescents and youth (AYLHIV) (10-24 years) and adults (≥25 years). RESULTS: We included 7378 PWH (25% AYLHIV, 75% adults), with 59% and 62% enrolled in 3MMD, respectively. Median follow-up time was 11.3 [interquartile range (IQR): 5.7-21.6] months for AYLHIV and 10.2 (IQR: 4.8-20.9) for adults. Attrition was lower in PWH enrolled in 3MMD compared with monthly ART dispensing, in both established (aHR AYLHIV = 0.65; 95% CI: 0.54-0.78 and aHR adults = 0.50; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.44-0.56) and early enrollers (aHR AYLHIV = 0.70; 95% CI: 0.58-0.85 and aHR adults = 0.63; 95% CI: 0.57-0.70). Among individuals in 3MMD, male gender (aHR = 1.30; 95% CI: 1.18-1.44) and receiving care in a medium-volume/low-volume healthcare facility (aHR = 1.18; 95% CI: 1.03-1.34) increased attrition risk. Conversely, longer ART time before 3MMD enrolment (aHR = 0.93; 95% CI: 0.92-0.94 per 1 month increase) and age at least 45 years (aHR = 0.77, 95% CI: 0.67-0.89) reduced risk of attrition. CONCLUSION: 3MMD improves retention in care compared with monthly dispensing among established and early enrollers, although to a lesser extent among the latter.

Effects of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Everyday Neurosurgical Practice in Alsace, France: Lessons Learned, Current Perspectives, and Future Challenges-Preliminary Results of a Longitudinal Multicentric Study Registry.

Background and Objectives: The global outbreak caused by the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic disrupted healthcare worldwide, impacting the organization of intensive care units and surgical care units. This study aimed to document the daily neurosurgical activity in Alsace, France, one of the European epicenters of the pandemic, and provide evidence of the adaptive strategies deployed during such a critical time for healthcare services. Materials and Methods: The multicentric longitudinal study was based on a prospective cohort of patients requiring neurosurgical care in the Neurosurgical Departments of Alsace, France, between March 2020 and March 2022. Surgical activity was compared with pre-pandemic performances through data obtained from electronic patient records. Results: A total of 3842 patients benefited from care in a neurosurgical unit during the period of interest; 2352 of them underwent surgeries with a wide range of pathologies treated. Surgeries were initially limited to neurosurgical emergencies only, then urgent cases were slowly reinstated; however, a significant drop in surgical volume and case mix was noticed during lockdown (March-May 2020). The crisis continued to impact surgical activity until March 2022; functional procedures were postponed, though some spine surgeries could progressively be performed starting in October 2021. Various social factors, such as increased alcohol consumption during the pandemic, influenced the severity of traumatic pathologies. The progressive return to the usual profile of surgical activity was characterized by a rebound of oncological interventions. Deferrable procedures for elective spinal and functional pathologies were the most affected, with unexpected medical and social impacts. Conclusions: The task shifting and task sharing approaches implemented during the first wave of the pandemic supported the reorganization of neurosurgical care in its aftermath and enabled the safe and timely execution of a broad spectrum of surgeries. Despite the substantial disruption to routine practices, marked by a significant reduction in elective surgical volumes, comprehensive records demonstrate the successful management of the full range of neurosurgical pathologies. This underscores the efficacy of adaptive strategies in navigating the challenges imposed by the largest healthcare crisis in recent history. Those lessons will continue to provide valuable insights and guidance for health and care managers to prepare for future unpredictable scenarios.

Endoscopic-enhanced supra-cerebellar trans-tentorial (SCTT) approach to temporo-mesial region: a multicenter study.

Surgical access to the temporo-mesial area may be achieved by several routes such as the sub-temporal, the temporal trans-ventricular, the pterional/trans-sylvian, and the occipital interhemispheric approaches; nonetheless, none of them has shown to be superior to the others. The supra-cerebellar trans-tentorial approach allows a great exposure of the middle and posterior temporo-mesial region, while avoiding temporal lobe retraction. A prospective multicenter study was designed to collect data on patients undergoing endoscopic-enhanced SCTT approach to excise left temporo-mesial lesions. The study involved 5 different neurosurgical European centers and ran from 2015 to 2020. All patients had preoperative as well as postoperative brain MRI and ophthalmology evaluation. A total of 30 patients were included in this study, the mean follow-up was 44 months (range 18 to 84 months), male/female ratio was 16/14, and mean age was 39 years. A gross total resection was achieved in 29/30 (96.7%) cases. All surgical procedures were uneventful, without transient or permanent neurological deficits thanks to the preservation of the posterior cerebral artery. The endoscopic-enhanced SCTT approach provides satisfactory exposure to the left temporo-mesial region. Its minimally invasive nature helps minimize the surgical risks related to vascular and white tract manipulation, which represent known limitations of open microsurgical as well as other approaches.

Learning curve and influencing factors of performing microsurgical anastomosis: a laboratory prospective study.

Despite being a critical component of any cerebrovascular procedure, acquiring skills in microsurgical anastomosis is challenging for trainees. In this context, simulation models, especially laboratory training, enable trainees to master microsurgical techniques before performing real surgeries. The objective of this study was to identify the factors influencing the learning curve of microsurgical training. A prospective observational study was conducted during a 7-month diploma in microsurgical techniques carried out in the anatomy laboratory of the school of surgery. Training focused on end-to-end (ETE) and end-to-side (ETS) anastomoses performed on the abdominal aorta, vena cava, internal carotid and jugular vein, femoral artery and vein, caudal artery, etc. of Wistar strain rats under supervision of 2 expert anatomical trainers. Objective and subjective data were collected after each training session. The 44 microsurgical trainees enrolled in the course performed 1792 anastomoses (1577 ETE, 88%, vs. 215 ETS, 12%). The patency rate of 41% was independent from the trainees' surgical background and previous experience. The dissection and the temporary clamping time both significantly decreased over the months (p < 0.001). Technical mistakes were independently associated with thrombosis of the anastomoses, as assessed by the technical mistakes score (p < 0.01). The training duration (in weeks) at time of each anastomosis was the only significant predictor of permeability (p < 0.001). Training duration and technical mistakes constituted the two major factors driving the learning curve. Future studies should try and investigate other factors (such as access to wet laboratory, dedicated fellowships, mentoring during early years as junior consultant/attending) influencing the retention of surgical skills for our difficult and challenging discipline.

Efficacy of endoscopic management of primary central nervous system lymphoma: a multicentric study and literature review.

INTRODUCTION: To date, confined intra-ventricular localization of primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) has been usually managed with open surgical resection and/or stereotactic biopsy; nonetheless, the endoscopic approach to such localization can provide many advantages over standard microsurgery and/or stereotactic biopsy. Here we present our experience in managing such a rare pathology through the endoscopic approach. METHOD: In order to gather more information about such a rare pathology, a retrospective multicentric study on a prospectively built database has been performed during a 5 year period. Ten different European centers have been involved. RESULTS: A total of 60 patients, 25 women and 35 men, have been enrolled in the study. The mean age was 65.3 years. The mean lesion size was 40.3 mm. Among all selected patients, 40 (66.6%) had superficial lesions within the ventricle, whereas the remaining 20 (33.4%) had lesions involving/extending to deeper structures. All surgical procedures were uneventful and ETV was deemed necessary only in 20/60 cases. CONCLUSION: In our experience, endoscopic management of intraventricular PCNSL is an effective option. It should be considered after a careful examination of neurological and immunological status, alternative options for diagnostic sampling, location of the lesion, and presence or absence of hydrocephalus. Endoscopic management could be considered as a safe and minimally invasive option to obtain: (a) a biopsy sample of the lesion for further diagnostic workup, (b) CSF diversion through third ventriculostomy or VP shunt for the management of hydrocephalus, and (c) insertion of ventricular access devices for long term medical management and whenever necessary as a rescue option for ventricular tap.