Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg ; 42(2): 243-7, 2016 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26038056

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Acute care surgery (ACS) services have evolved in an effort to provide 24-h surgical services for a wide array of general surgical emergencies. The formation of ACS services has been shown to improve outcomes and lead to more expeditious care. Despite the advances of ACS, the etiology and timing of patient mortality has yet to be described. We hypothesized that infectious complications occur more frequently in ACS patients that die during their hospitalization. METHODS: A retrospective review of a local ACS service (non-trauma) registry was conducted. Demographic variables, admission and discharge data, and ICD-9 codes were collected. ICD-9 codes were used to identify patients with sepsis, shock, GI perforation, peritonitis, and other hospital acquired infections (urinary tract, bloodstream, and ventilator-associated pneumonias). Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to model the outcome of death. RESULTS: 1,329 patients were analyzed. 53 % were male with the mean age of 52 years and an average length of stay of 13 days. 106 (8 %) died while in the hospital. Of the patients who died, 34 (32 %) died within 7 days of admission. The majority of mortalities (56 %) occurred after hospital day 14. In ACS patients that died, there were significantly higher rates of sepsis, shock, peritonitis, urinary tract infections, and VAP. After adjustment; age, sepsis on admission, and shock on admission were associated with greater odds of death. CONCLUSION: ACS patients with sepsis and shock have higher mortality rate than those patients without. The majority of ACS patient deaths occurred after hospital day 14. Further investigation and continued focus on preventing and rapidly treating infectious complications as they arise is warranted.


Subject(s)
Critical Care , Cross Infection , Emergency Medical Services , Surgical Procedures, Operative , Critical Care/methods , Critical Care/statistics & numerical data , Cross Infection/epidemiology , Cross Infection/etiology , Emergency Medical Services/methods , Emergency Medical Services/statistics & numerical data , Female , Hospital Mortality , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Length of Stay , Male , Middle Aged , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Postoperative Complications , Registries , Surgical Procedures, Operative/adverse effects , Surgical Procedures, Operative/mortality , Surgical Procedures, Operative/statistics & numerical data , United States
2.
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg ; 41(5): 539-43, 2015 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26037983

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Though primary repair of colon injuries is preferred, certain injury patterns require colostomy creation. Colostomy reversal is associated with significant morbidity and healthcare cost. Complication rates may be influenced by technique of diversion (loop vs. end colostomy), though this remains ill-defined. We hypothesized that reversal of loop colostomies is associated with fewer complications than end colostomies. METHODS: This is a retrospective, multi-institutional study (four, level-1 trauma centers) of patients undergoing colostomy takedown for trauma during the time period 1/2006-12/2012. Data were collected from index trauma admission and subsequent admission for reversal and included demographics and complications of reversal. Student's t test was used to compare continuous variables against loop versus end colostomy. Discrete variables were compared against both groups using Chi-squared tests. RESULTS: Over the 6-year study period, 218 patients underwent colostomy takedown after trauma with a mean age of 30; 190 (87%) were male, 162 (74%) had penetrating injury as their indication for colostomy, and 98 (45%) experienced at least one complication. Patients in the end colostomy group (n = 160) were more likely to require midline laparotomy (145 vs. 18, p < 0.001), had greater intra-operative blood loss (260.7 vs. 99.4 mL, p < 0.001), had greater hospital length of stay (8.4 vs. 5.5 days, p < 0.001), and had more overall complications (81 vs. 17, p = 0.005) than patients managed with loop colostomy (n = 58). CONCLUSIONS: Local takedown of a loop colostomy is safe and leads to shorter hospital stays, less intra-operative blood loss, and fewer complications when compared to end colostomy.


Subject(s)
Colon/injuries , Colostomy/methods , Rectum/injuries , Adult , Blood Loss, Surgical , Colon/surgery , Female , Humans , Length of Stay , Male , Rectum/surgery , Reoperation/statistics & numerical data , Retrospective Studies
3.
Orthopedics ; 11(7): 1083-7, 1988 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-3405908

ABSTRACT

Two illustrative cases of patients with skeletal fluorosis and classic radiographic changes are presented. One patient demonstrated a progressive paraparesis, while the other was diagnosed incidentally on routine radiographs. A review of the literature, treatment, and histologic findings are presented.


Subject(s)
Bone Diseases/chemically induced , Fluoride Poisoning/diagnostic imaging , Aged , Bone Diseases/diagnostic imaging , Bone and Bones/pathology , Female , Fluoride Poisoning/pathology , Humans , Male , Radiography
6.
Orthopedics ; 9(5): 755-6, 1986 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-3714588
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...