Centralisation of services for the management of ovarian cancer: arguments against.

In 2000, the Commissioning Guidance for gynaecological cancer services relied on a subset analysis within a retrospective study to support its requirement that surgery for carcinoma of the ovary be centralised. We have reviewed the literature covering this issue, especially that published in the past 6 years. There is no evidence for an advantage for specialist gynaecological oncologists over general gynaecologists for these women; studies that suggest that one exists fail to separate patients presenting to general surgeons, whose patients are at a clear disadvantage, from those seen by gynaecologists. There is evidence for the need for appropriate surgery in women with less extensive disease where the diagnostic difficulties are greatest. We argue for investment in the diagnosis of ovarian cancer and the provision of services for its medical treatment over a prolonged period.

Antenatal home blood pressure monitoring: a pilot randomised controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To measure recruitment to, compliance with, and the acceptability of a trial designed to test whether a reduced schedule of antenatal visits combined with training in self-measurement of blood pressure at home may improve hypertension screening and save money. To test the specific hypothesis that even after taking into account extra unscheduled visits, the reduced schedule with ambulatory monitoring reduces total visits. DESIGN: A pilot randomised controlled trial. SETTING: Four urban and four rural general practices in Yorkshire and Lancashire. POPULATION: One hundred and five low risk women in the third trimester of pregnancy. Eighty women participated. INTERVENTION: Women were invited to participate at 24-28 weeks. Those who accepted were allocated either to a standard nine subsequent visit schedule (30, 32, 34, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41 weeks) or to a reduced schedule (34, 38, 41 weeks). Those in the latter group measured their blood pressure weekly using a portable sphygmomanometer at home. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Recruitment, total number of clinic visits, frequency of blood pressure measurement, schedule preference, and anxiety. RESULTS: Although there were more unscheduled visits in the home monitoring group, this did not outweigh the reduction in scheduled visits, (total visits reduced from 7 x 4 to 4 x 5, P < 0 x 001), and blood pressure was measured during more weeks (9 vs 7 weeks, P < 0 x 001) in the experimental group. Most women expressed a preference for the reduced schedule both when the idea was first suggested, and after they had experienced it, and there were no significant differences in anxiety. CONCLUSION: Replacement of antenatal screening visits with home blood pressure monitoring is acceptable to women. The reduction in clinic visits is not compensated by an increase in visits for other reasons and overall blood pressure measurement is omitted less often. Whether it reduces adverse outcomes or has any rare side effects will require a larger trial, but this pilot study indicates that it is likely to be safe, and that such a large trial would be feasible.

The effects of fetal exposure to danazol.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the consequences of exposure to danazol in utero. Additionally, by assessing the risk, to facilitate the counselling of pregnant women inadvertently exposed to danazol in early pregnancy. DESIGN: Retrospective review of reported case histories. SUBJECTS: 129 women exposed to danazol during pregnancy were identified from individual case reports, data from the Australian Drug Reactions Advisory Committee and the United States Food and Drug Administration and from the reports of danazol exposure made directly to the manufacturers. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Teratogenic effects of fetal exposure to danazol in relation to dosage and duration of exposure. RESULTS: Of the 129 reported pregnancies, 12 miscarried and 23 were aborted. Of the 94 completed pregnancies, 37 resulted in the birth of normal males, 34 in non-virilized females and 23 in virilized females. Virilization occurred in a proportion of female fetuses with a pattern of cliteromegaly, fused labia and urogenital sinus formation. Surgery to the genital tract was usually, but not always, required in childhood. The abnormality has not been reported where danazol therapy had been discontinued before the 8th week of pregnancy. Although more common in the higher dosages, virilization was reported in one case with a 200 mg daily dosage. CONCLUSIONS: Danazol should remain contraindicated in pregnancy and clinicians should give careful contraceptive advice to patients commencing or continuing danazol therapy. Nonetheless it is possible to be cautiously optimistic about the outcome of danazol-exposed pregnancies, particularly if treatment is discontinued before 8 completed weeks gestation.