Management of vulnerable patient phenotypes and acute coronary syndrome mechanisms.

Atherosclerosis is a chronic vascular disease. Its prevalence increases with aging. However, atherosclerosis may also affect young subjects without significant exposure to the classical risk factors. Recent evidence indicates clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential (CHIP) as a novel cardiovascular risk factor that should be suspected in young patients. CHIP represents a link between impaired bone marrow and atherosclerosis. Atherosclerosis may present with an acute symptomatic manifestation or subclinical events that favor plaque growth. The outcome of a plaque relies on a balance of innate and environmental factors. These factors can influence the processes that initiate and propagate acute plaque destabilization leading to intraluminal thrombus formation or subclinical vessel healing. Thirty years ago, the first autopsy study revealed that coronary plaques can undergo rupture even in subjects without a known cardiovascular history. Nowadays, cardiac magnetic resonance studies demonstrate that this phenomenon is not rare. Myocardial infarction is mainly due to plaque rupture and plaque erosion that have different pathophysiological mechanisms. Plaque erosion carries a better prognosis as compared to plaque rupture. Thus, a tailored conservative treatment has been proposed and some studies demonstrated it to be safe. On the contrary, plaque rupture is typically associated with inflammation and anti-inflammatory treatments have been proposed in response to persistently elevate biomarkers of systemic inflammation. In conclusion, atherosclerosis may present in different forms or phenotypes. Vulnerable patient phenotypes, identified by using intravascular imaging techniques, biomarkers, or even genetic analyses, are characterized by distinctive pathophysiological mechanisms. These different phenotypes merit tailored management.

Novel Medical Treatments and Devices for the Management of Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction.

Heart failure (HF) is a growing issue in developed countries; it is often the result of underlying processes such as ischemia, hypertension, infiltrative diseases or even genetic abnormalities. The great majority of the affected patients present a reduced ejection fraction (≤40%), thereby falling under the name of "heart failure with reduced ejection fraction" (HFrEF). This condition represents a major threat for patients: it significantly affects life quality and carries an enormous burden on the whole healthcare system due to its high management costs. In the last decade, new medical treatments and devices have been developed in order to reduce HF hospitalizations and improve prognosis while reducing the overall mortality rate. Pharmacological therapy has significantly changed our perspective of this disease thanks to its ability of restoring ventricular function and reducing symptom severity, even in some dramatic contexts with an extensively diseased myocardium. Notably, medical therapy can sometimes be ineffective, and a tailored integration with device technologies is of pivotal importance. Not by chance, in recent years, cardiac implantable devices witnessed a significant improvement, thereby providing an irreplaceable resource for the management of HF. Some devices have the ability of assessing (CardioMEMS) or treating (ultrafiltration) fluid retention, while others recognize and treat life-threatening arrhythmias, even for a limited time frame (wearable cardioverter defibrillator). The present review article gives a comprehensive overview of the most recent and important findings that need to be considered in patients affected by HFrEF. Both novel medical treatments and devices are presented and discussed.

Recurrent events after acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: predictors and features of plaque progression and stent failure.

OBJECTIVES: Patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) are at high risk for recurrent coronary events (RCE). Non-culprit plaque progression and stent failure are the main causes of RCEs. We sought to identify the incidence and predictors of RCEs. METHODS: Eight hundred thirty patients with STEMI were enrolled and followed up for 5 years. All patients underwent blood test analysis at hospital admission, at 1-month and at 12-month follow-up times. Patients were divided into RCE group and control group. RCE group was further categorized into non-culprit plaque progression and stent failure subgroups. RESULTS: Among 830 patients with STEMI, 63 patients had a RCE (7.6%). At hospital admission, HDL was numerically lower in RCE group, while LDL at both 1-month and 12-month follow-up times were significantly higher in RCE group. Both HDL at hospital admission and LDL at 12-month follow-up were independently associated with RCEs (OR 0.90, 95% CI 0.81-0.99 and OR 1.041, 95% CI 1.01-1.07, respectively). RCEs were due to non-culprit plaque progression in 47.6% of cases, while in 36.5% due to stent failure. The mean time frame between pPCI and RCE was significantly greater for non-culprit plaque progression subgroup as compared to stent failure subgroup (27 ±â€…18 months and 16 ±â€…14 months, P  = 0.032). CONCLUSION: RCEs still affect patients after pPCI. Low levels of HDL at admission and high levels of LDL at 12 months after pPCI significantly predicted RCEs. A RCE results in non-culprit plaque progression presents much later than an event due to stent failure.

Comparison of myocardial reperfusion between intracoronary versus intravenous cangrelor administration in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention.

BACKGROUND: Myocardial reperfusion is the main target of treatment in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). The intracoronary administration of cangrelor bolus could favor a higher local drug concentration, favoring an earlier thrombotic resolution and a reduced distal micro-embolization. METHODS: Seventy-one patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for STEMI: 37 treated with intracoronary and 34 with intravenous bolus administration of cangrelor. The primary endpoint was ST-segment elevation resolution (STR) ≥ 50% after 30 min from the end of the PCI. Other explorative reperfusion indices investigated were: STR ≥ 50% at 24 hours, STR ≥ 70% at 30 min, Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction frame count and the QT dispersion. Moreover, acute and subacute stent thrombosis, bleeding events and 30-day mortality have been evaluated. RESULTS: More frequent STR ≥ 50% was observed in the intravenous cangrelor bolus group as compared to the intracoronary administration at 30 min (71.9% vs. 45.5%; p = 0.033), the difference was maintained 24 hours after PCI (87.1% vs. 63.6%; p = 0.030). STR ≥ 70% at 30 min was statistically more frequent in the intravenous bolus administration cohort (66.7% vs. 28.6% p = 0.02). At multivariable analysis, intravenous cangrelor administration was significantly related to STR ≥ 50% (odds ratio: 3.586; 95% confidence interval: 1.134-11.335; p = 0.030). The incidence of Bleeding Academic Research Consortium 3-5 bleedings was 15.5% and mortality was 4.2% without any significant difference between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion the results of the study do not show any advantages in the administration of intracoronary bolus of cangrelor in patients affected by STEMI and treated with primary PCI.

Chronic total occlusion revascularization: A complex piece to "complete" the puzzle.

Treatment of coronary chronic total occlusion (CTO) with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has rapidly increased during the past decades. Different strategies and approach were developed in the recent past years leading to an increase in CTO-PCI procedural success. The goal to achieve an extended revascularization with a high rate of completeness is now supported by strong scientific evidences and consequently, has led to an exponential increase in the number of CTO-PCI procedures, even if are still underutilized. It has been widely demonstrated that complete coronary revascularization, achieved by either coronary artery bypass graft or PCI, is associated with prognostic improvement, in terms of increased survival and reduction of major adverse cardiovascular events. The application of "contemporary" strategies aimed to obtain a state-of-the-art revascularization by PCI allows to achieve long-term clinical benefit, even in high-risk patients or complex coronary anatomy with CTO. The increasing success of CTO-PCI, allowing a complete or reasonable incomplete coronary revascularization, is enabling to overcome the last great challenge of interventional cardiology, adding a "complex" piece to "complete" the puzzle.