Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Int J Legal Med ; 113(1): 50-4, 1999.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10654240

ABSTRACT

This paper describes the general design and main results of the Italian proficiency testing program for the analysis of psychoactive substances in urine, a long-term initiative created in 1995 on an educational basis and characterized by an innovative internet-based service for data exchange between laboratories and the organizing body. Batches of six urine samples, validated by reference laboratories, are sent every 3 months to participating laboratories, which may choose which classes of substances to test from those planned by the program panel and, within those classes, which type of analytical commitment to work on: identification of just one class (Option 1), identification of single substances (Option 2), or identification and quantification of single substances (Option 3). Comprehensive periodical reports and annual reports are provided to participants with evaluation of their performance and an annual workshop is organized to discuss technical-scientific topics related to clinical, forensic and analytical toxicology. About 200 laboratories currently participate in the program and a total of 67,059 analyses have been carried out since 1995. The mean percentage of correct results was 96.8%, with a yearly improvement of about 0.4%. The best average false positive and false negative rates were obtained for methadone (0.2% and 2.1% respectively) and cocaine (0.3% and 2.2%). The worst average false positive rates were obtained for amphetamines and opiates (3.2% and 5.0%) and worst average false negative rates for amphetamines, barbiturates and cannabinoids (17.4%, 30.7% and 19.9%).


Subject(s)
Substance Abuse Detection/standards , Substance-Related Disorders/diagnosis , Substance-Related Disorders/urine , Accreditation/organization & administration , Bias , False Negative Reactions , False Positive Reactions , Forensic Medicine/education , Forensic Medicine/organization & administration , Humans , Information Services , Internet , Italy , Laboratories/organization & administration , Program Evaluation , Quality Control , Reproducibility of Results , Substance Abuse Detection/methods , Toxicology/education , Toxicology/organization & administration
2.
J Chromatogr B Biomed Sci Appl ; 713(1): 227-43, 1998 Aug 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9700561

ABSTRACT

The validity and effectiveness of quality control procedures are reviewed here in light of the principles of analytical toxicology, and of the professional responsibility involved in awareness of the profound influence which analytical results have in the fields of health and social security. Regardless of the methods used, laboratory work should aim essentially at achieving a very high degree of reliability. Factors contributing to the 'quality' of analytical results and methods used to check their reliability are discussed here. The technical background and organization of internal and external quality control procedures are presented, with particular reference to educational aspects, and to the ways in which computer and internet technologies may be exploited for further improvement of the effectiveness of these procedures.


Subject(s)
Clinical Laboratory Techniques/standards , Toxicology/standards , Humans , Quality Control , Reference Standards , Reference Values , Terminology as Topic , Toxicology/methods
3.
J Anal Toxicol ; 18(5): 278-91, 1994 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-7990448

ABSTRACT

This study deals with the experimental and statistical comparison of six immunochemical techniques, including noninstrumental on-site and instrumental formats (EIA-EMIT and EZ-SCREEN; FPIA-ADx; RIA-Coat-A-Count; LI-Abuscreen ONTRAK; CBI-Triage), and three chromatographic techniques (TLC-Toxi-Lab; HPLC; HPLC-REMEDi drug profiling system), using GC-MS as a reference technique for analyzing amphetamines, barbiturates, benzodiazepines, cannabinoids, cocaine, methadone, and opiates in the urine of various kinds of drug users. The study reports (a) the values of sensitivity, specificity, false-positive rates, and false-negative rates of each technique; (b) the results of bayesian statistical analysis, which are based on prevalence values of the samples examined and expressed as positive and negative predictive values and cumulative predictive values for each single technique and for combinations of paired immunochemical and chromatographic techniques; and (c) the results of a rough classification of the various degrees of predictability of these techniques. Lastly, this study proposes a decision-making process for establishing the best combination of analytical techniques for the goals in question, according to the characteristics and facilities of each laboratory.


Subject(s)
Chromatography/methods , Illicit Drugs/urine , Immunoassay/methods , Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry , Humans , Illicit Drugs/classification , Sensitivity and Specificity , Statistics as Topic/methods
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...