Ketamine for mood disorders, anxiety, and suicidality in children and adolescents: a systematic review.

Mood disorders, anxiety, and suicidality in youth are increasing and rapid-acting treatments are urgently needed. One potential is ketamine or its enantiomer esketamine, which was FDA approved in 2019 to treat major depressive disorder with suicidality in adults. This systematic review evaluated the evidence for the clinical use of ketamine to treat mood disorders, anxiety, and suicidality in youth. The PRISMA guidelines were used, and a protocol registered prospectively ( https://osf.io/9ucsg/ ). The literature search included Pubmed/MEDLINE, Ovid/MEDLINE, Scopus, CINAHL, PsychInfo, and Google Scholar. Trial registries and preprint servers were searched, and authors contacted for clarification. Studies reported on the clinical use of ketamine to treat anxiety, depression, bipolar disorder, or suicidality in youth ≤19 years old and assessed symptoms before and after ketamine use. Study screening and data extraction were conducted independently by 2-4 authors. Safety, tolerability, and efficacy data were collected. The Cochrane Risk of Bias guidelines assessed the quality of the evidence. Twenty-two published reports based on 16 studies were identified: 7 case studies, 6 observational studies, 3 randomized trials, and 6 secondary data analyses. Studies reported immediate improvements in depression, anxiety, and suicidality. Improvements were maintained for weeks-months following treatment. Ketamine was well-tolerated with the most common side effects being dizziness, nausea, and mild dissociation. Transient hemodynamic changes were reported, all of which resolved quickly and did not require medical intervention. Initial evidence suggests ketamine is safe and may be effective for mood disorders, anxiety, and suicidality in youth. Further randomized trials are warranted.

Evaluating Mineral Biomarkers as Mediators and Moderators of Behavioural Improvements in a Randomized Controlled Trial of Multinutrients for Children with ADHD.

Essential minerals are cofactors for synthesis of neurotransmitters supporting cognition and mood. An 8-week fully-blind RCT of multinutrients for ADHD demonstrated three times as many children (age 6-12) had significantly improved behavior ("treatment responders") on multinutrients (54%) compared to placebo (18%). The aim of this secondary study was to evaluate changes in fasted plasma and urinary mineral concentrations following the intervention, and their role as mediators and moderators of treatment response. Fourteen essential or trace minerals were measured in plasma and/or urine at baseline and week 8 from 86 participants (49 multinutrient, 37 placebo). Two-sample t-tests/Mann-Whitney U-tests compared 8-week change between treatment and placebo groups, which were also evaluated as potential mediators. Baseline levels were evaluated as potential moderators, using logistic regression models with clinical treatment response as the outcome. After 8 weeks, plasma boron, chromium (in females only), lithium, molybdenum, selenium, and vanadium, and urinary iodine, lithium, and selenium increased more with multinutrients than placebo, while plasma phosphorus decreased. These changes did not mediate treatment response. However, baseline urinary lithium trended toward moderation: participants with lower baseline urinary lithium were more likely to respond to multinutrients (p=0.058). Additionally, participants with higher baseline iron were more likely to be treatment responders regardless of treatment group (p=0.036.) These results show that multinutrient treatment response among children with ADHD is independent of their baseline plasma mineral levels, while baseline urinary lithium levels show potential as a non-invasive biomarker of treatment response requiring further study.

Treatment response to supplemental nutrients for ADHD is independent of diet quality: the MADDY Study RCT.

OBJECTIVES: The 8-week Micronutrients for ADHD in Youth (MADDY) randomized controlled trial (N = 126, age 6-12) of broad-spectrum multinutrients for ADHD with emotional dysregulation found 3 times as many responders with multinutrients (54%) compared to placebo (18%) by Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I). Our primary aim for this analysis tests the hypothesis that those with poor overall diet quality at baseline benefit more. The second aim is to explore whether specific components of diet quality moderate treatment response. METHODS: 124 children (69 multinutrients, 55 placebo) had diet quality assessed using the Healthy Eating Index-2015 (HEI-2015). For each potential moderator, the outcome CGI-I at week 8 (RCT-end), was modeled two ways: (1) as a dichotomous variable: responder/non-responder, with responders defined by a rating of 1 or 2 'very much' or 'much improved,' all else equals non-responder using logistic regression, and (2) as a dimensional improvement outcome from 1 = very much improved to 7 = very much worse, using linear regression. RESULTS: HEI-2015 total score did not moderate treatment response [odds ratio = 1.00 (95% CI: 0.90,1.10), p = 0.984] or improvement [ß = -0.01 (95% CI: -0.06,0.04), p = 0.648]. However, total vegetable intake moderated level of improvement in exploratory analysis [ß = -0.48 (95% CI: -0.82, -0.13), p = 0.007]: those with higher baseline vegetable intake showed greater benefit from multinutrients compared to placebo. CONCLUSIONS: Multinutrients may benefit children with ADHD and irritability regardless of overall diet quality. The finding that higher baseline vegetable intake may improve response to multinutrients deserves further exploration, including dietary effect on gut microbiota and absorption of multinutrients and parental factors.

Dr. Johnstone et al. Reply to Dr. Elmrayed.

We thank Dr. Elmrayed and colleagues1 for highlighting clinical cautions in using broad-spectrum micronutrients to treat attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in children, in particular manganese (Mn) levels. We appreciate the opportunity to provide additional information and rationale for the vitamin and mineral doses contained in the studied formula.

Dr. Johnstone et al. Reply to Dr. Hamilton.

We thank Dr. Hamilton1 for his interest in our research and for provoking a more nuanced and detailed approach to analyzing the relationship among treatment assignment, treatment response, and correct treatment guessing in randomized controlled trials; in this case, the Micronutrients for ADHD in Youth (MADDY) study.2.

Micronutrients for ADHD in youth (MADDY) study: comparison of results from RCT and open label extension.

BACKGROUND: The Micronutrients for Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder in Youth (MADDY) study evaluated the efficacy and safety of a multinutrient formula for children with ADHD and emotional dysregulation. The post-RCT open-label extension (OLE) compared the effect of treatment duration (8 weeks vs 16 weeks) on ADHD symptoms, height velocity, and adverse events (AEs). METHODS: Children aged 6-12 years randomized to multinutrients vs. placebo for 8 weeks (RCT), received an 8-week OLE for a total of 16 weeks. Assessments included the Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I), Child and Adolescent Symptom Inventory-5 (CASI-5), Pediatric Adverse Events Rating Scale (PAERS), and anthropometric measures (height and weight). RESULTS: Of the 126 in the RCT, 103 (81%) continued in the OLE. For those initially assigned to placebo, CGI-I responders increased from 23% in the RCT to 64% in the OLE; those who took multinutrients for 16 weeks increased from 53% (RCT) to 66% responders (OLE). Both groups improved on the CASI-5 composite score and subscales from week 8 to week 16 (all p-values < 0.01). The group taking 16 weeks of multinutrients had marginally greater height growth (2.3 cm) than those with 8 weeks (1.8 cm) (p = 0.07). No difference in AEs between groups was found. CONCLUSION: The response rate to multinutrients by blinded clinician ratings at 8 weeks was maintained to 16 weeks; the response rate in the group initially assigned to placebo improved significantly with 8 weeks of multinutrients and almost caught up with 16 weeks. Longer time on multinutrients did not result in greater AEs, confirming an acceptable safety profile.

Non-pharmacological interventions for attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder in children and adolescents.

Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) affects approximately 5% of children and adolescents globally and is associated with negative life outcomes and socioeconomic costs. First-generation ADHD treatments were predominantly pharmacological; however, increased understanding of biological, psychological, and environmental factors contributing to ADHD has expanded non-pharmacological treatment possibilities. This Review provides an updated evaluation of the efficacy and safety of non-pharmacological treatments for paediatric ADHD, discussing the quality and level of evidence for nine intervention categories. Unlike medication, no non-pharmacological treatments showed a consistent strong effect on ADHD symptoms. When considering broad outcomes (eg, impairment, caregiver stress, and behavioural improvement), multicomponent (cognitive) behaviour therapy joined medication as a primary ADHD treatment. With respect to secondary treatments, polyunsaturated fatty acids showed a consistent modest effect on ADHD symptoms when taken for at least 3 months. Additionally, mindfulness and multinutrient supplementation with four or more ingredients showed modest efficacy on non-symptom outcomes. All other non-pharmacological treatments were safe; clinicians might tolerate their use but should educate families of childrenand adolescents with ADHD on the disadvantages, including costs, burden to the service user, absence of proven efficacy relative to other treatments, and delay of proven treatment.

Fruit and vegetable intake is inversely associated with severity of inattention in a pediatric population with ADHD symptoms: the MADDY Study.

OBJECTIVES: Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) is a neurodevelopmental disorder with a U.S. pediatric prevalence of 8-10%. It presents with inattention and hyperactivity/impulsivity; frequently associated with emotional dysregulation (ED) symptoms common in Oppositional Defiant Disorder and Disruptive Mood Dysregulation Disorder. The etiology of ADHD is multi-factorial; symptom severity is associated with diet. This study examines the association of diet quality with ADHD and ED symptoms within a pediatric research cohort. METHODS: Baseline data were analyzed for 134 children aged 6-12 years with symptoms of ADHD and ED enrolled in an RCT of multinutrient supplementation. Diet quality was based on Healthy Eating Index-2015 (HEI-2015). ADHD and ED symptoms were assessed using Child and Adolescent Symptom Inventory-5 and Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire. Linear regression models, adjusting for covariates when necessary, determined association. RESULTS: The mean HEI Total Score of 63.4 (SD = 8.8) was not significantly associated with any outcome symptoms. However, after adjusting for covariates, HEI component scores for total fruit intake (ß = -0.158, p = .037) and total vegetable intake (ß = -0.118, p = .004) were negatively associated with inattention. CONCLUSIONS: The lack of association with total diet quality could be explained by the relatively good baseline diet quality and mild symptom severity in this sample, along with measurement error from dietary intake estimates and relatively small sample size. These findings suggest that dietary intake may impact inattention in children with ADHD and ED: those eating less fruits and vegetables were likely to have more severe symptoms of inattention. Causality is not established by this cross-sectional analysis.

Pain sensitivity and perceptual sensitivity are associated with severity of emotional dysregulation in children with ADHD: a cross-sectional analysis using the Temperament in Middle Childhood Questionnaire.

PURPOSE: Nearly 50% of children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) experience emotional dysregulation or sensory over-responsiveness; this study examines their association. METHODS: This cross-sectional analysis (n = 124) used data from the Micronutrients for ADHD in Youth (MADDY) Study, which enrolled children aged 6-12 with ADHD and emotional dysregulation. Sensory responsiveness was assessed using two subscales from the factor-analyzed Temperament in Middle Childhood Questionnaire: Pain Sensitivity and Perceptual Sensitivity. Emotional dysregulation was assessed using the Emotional-Problems and Conduct-Problems subscales from the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire and a composite score from the Child & Adolescent Symptom Inventory-5. Multivariable linear regression measured the association of pain and perceptual sensitivity with the severity of emotional dysregulation. RESULTS: In adjusted models, pain sensitivity was positively associated with Emotional Problems (ß = 0.97; 95% CI: 0.52, 1.41; p < 0.0001), Conduct Problems (ß = 0.83; 95% CI: 0.44, 1.21; p = 0.0001), and CASI-5 composite (ß = 0.25; 95% CI: 0.16, 0.34; p < 0.0001). Perceptual sensitivity was positively associated with Emotional Problems (ß = 0.75; 95% CI: 0.15, 1.35; p = 0.01) but not Conduct Problems (ß = 0.27; 95% CI: -0.24, 0.77; p = 0.30) or CASI-5 composite (ß = 0.12; 95% CI: -0.01, 0.24; p = 0.07). CONCLUSION: Pain sensitivity was associated with the severity of emotional dysregulation in this ADHD sample. To better understand possible causal links, longitudinal studies are warranted.Implications for rehabilitationEmotional dysregulation and sensory over-responsiveness are both common in children with ADHD and contribute to added challenges in school and family life.Two types of sensory over-responsiveness, pain sensitivity and perceptual sensitivity, were associated with emotional dysregulation in children with ADHD in our study.Sensory over-responsiveness may be a modifiable treatment target.

Parents' priorities and preferences for treatment of children with ADHD: Qualitative inquiry in the MADDY study.

BACKGROUND: Parents' lived experiences of having a child with ADHD may shape their decision making regarding ADHD treatment options for their child. The aim of this study was to explore parents' experiences of living with a child with ADHD in the family and how their experiences influence their perspectives on treatment preferences and priorities. METHODS: A phenomenological qualitative design was used. Semistructured interviews were conducted with parents of children with ADHD who were enrolled in a multisite randomized controlled trial. Interviews were transcribed verbatim, and transcripts at each site were double coded. Initial codes were derived directly from the text. Qualitative data were analysed with an inductive approach. RESULTS: Twenty-three parents were interviewed: eight from Alberta, Canada; eight from Portland, Oregon, USA; and seven from Columbus, Ohio, USA. Among the parents, 69% were married, 86% completed college education and 52% reported household income over $80,000. Among the children, the mean age was 9.6 years (SD = 1.8 years), 78% were boys and 48% were never medicated for their ADHD. Two major themes emerged from the analysis. Theme 1 was 'impact of ADHD on families within and outside the home' with the following subthemes: 'reconfiguring the home life', 'trial-and-error of accommodations at school' and 'responding to social pressures to fit in'. Theme 2 was 'enabling appropriate and accessible treatments for families' with the following subthemes: 'finding the "right fit" with professionals and treatments' and 'factors influencing inequitable access to treatments'. CONCLUSIONS: Parents described shared experiences and identified similar barriers, preferences and priorities for ADHD treatments regardless of demographic differences by site. Families desired access to family-centred, multimodal approaches to ADHD treatment. Further research is needed to identify the specific structural changes to healthcare, services and policies that will better support this approach.

Micronutrients for Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder in Youths: A Placebo-Controlled Randomized Clinical Trial.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether micronutrients (vitamins/minerals) benefit attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and irritability in a North American pediatric sample. METHOD: A 3-site, 8-week, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial of micronutrients was conducted in nonmedicated children aged 6 to 12 years with ADHD and at least 1 impairing irritability symptom by parent report on the Child and Adolescent Symptom Inventory-5 (CASI-5). A priori-defined primary outcomes were Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) (CGI-I of 1 or 2 = treatment responder) and parent-rated CASI-5 composite score of ADHD, oppositional defiant, disruptive mood dysregulation, and peer conflict symptoms, including impairment scores. RESULTS: Of 135 randomized (mean age 9.8 years), 126 youths (93%) comprised the modified intention-to-treat population. Blinding was maintained. For the CGI-I, 54% of the micronutrient and 18% of the placebo group were responders (risk ratio = 2.97, 97.5% CI = 1.50, 5.90, p < .001). CASI-5 composite scores improved significantly for both groups (p < .01), with a mean change of -0.31 (95% CI = -0.39, -0.23) in the micronutrient group and a mean change of -0.28 (95% CI = -0.38, -0.19) in the placebo group. However, the between-group difference was not significant (mean change = -0.02; 97.5% CI = -0.16, 0.12, effect size = 0.07, p = .70). The micronutrient group grew 6 mm more than the placebo group (p = .002). No serious adverse events or clinically significant changes from baseline in blood and urine tests occurred. CONCLUSION: Micronutrients showed global benefit over placebo by blinded clinician rating, but not by parent-report CASI-5 composite rating in a population with ADHD and irritability. Micronutrients showed greater height growth. Micronutrients were well tolerated, and the majority of participants adhered to the number of capsules prescribed. This randomized controlled trial replicates safety and efficacy reported for ADHD in 2 smaller trials of a similar formula containing all vitamins and known essential minerals in amounts between the Recommended Dietary Allowance and Upper Tolerable Intake Level. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION INFORMATION: Micronutrients for ADHD in Youth (MADDY) Study; https://clinicaltrials.gov; NCT03252522.