Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Br J Psychiatry ; 191: 427-35, 2007 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17978323

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Treatment guidelines identify few adequately powered trials to guide recommendations for anorexia nervosa. AIMS: To evaluate the effectiveness of three readily available National Health Service treatments for adolescents (aged 12-18 years) with anorexia nervosa. METHOD: Multicentre randomised controlled trial of 167 young people comparing in-patient, specialist out-patient and general child and adolescent mental health service (CAMHS) treatment. RESULTS: Each group made considerable progress at 1 year, with further improvement by 2 years. Full recovery rates were poor (33% at 2 years, 27% still with anorexia nervosa). Adherence to in-patient treatment was only 50%. Neither in-patient nor specialist out-patient therapy demonstrated advantages over general CAMHS treatment by intention to treat, although some CAMHS out-patients were subsequently admitted on clinical grounds. In-patient treatment (randomised or after out-patient transfer) predicted poor outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: First-line in-patient psychiatric treatment does not provide advantages over out-patient management. Out-patient treatment failures do very poorly on transfer to in-patient facilities.


Subject(s)
Anorexia Nervosa/therapy , Delivery of Health Care/methods , Adolescent , Child , Cognitive Behavioral Therapy/methods , Community Mental Health Services/methods , England , Family Therapy/methods , Female , Hospitalization , Humans , Male , Outpatient Clinics, Hospital , Patient Compliance , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales , State Medicine/organization & administration , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...