ABSTRACT
The use of tourniquets for life-threatening limb hemorrhage is standard of care in military and civilian medicine. The United States (U.S.) Department of Defense (DoD) Committee on Tactical Combat Casualty Care (CoTCCC) guidelines, as part of the Joint Trauma System, support the application of tourniquets within a structured system reliant on highly trained medics and expeditious evacuation. Current practices by entities such as the DoD and North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) are supported by evidence collected in counter-insurgency operations and other conflicts in which transport times to care rarely went beyond one hour, and casualty rates and tactical situations rarely exceeded capabilities. Tourniquets cause complications when misused or utilized for prolonged durations, and in near-peer or peer-peer conflicts, contested airspace and the impact of high-attrition warfare may increase time to definitive care and limit training resources. We present a series of cases from the war in Ukraine that suggest tourniquet practices are contributing to complications such as limb amputation, overall morbidity and mortality, and increased burden on the medical system. We discuss factors that contribute to this phenomenon and propose interventions for use in current and future similar contexts, with the ultimate goal of reducing morbidity and mortality.
ABSTRACT
STUDY OBJECTIVE: To examine the distribution of hospitalized COVID-19 patients among adult acute care facilities in the Greater Philadelphia area and identify factors associated with hospitals carrying higher burdens of COVID-19 patients. METHODS: In this observational descriptive study, we obtained self-reported daily COVID-19 inpatient censuses from 28 large (>100 beds) adult acute care hospitals in the Greater Philadelphia region during the initial wave of the COVID-19 pandemic (March 23, 2020, to July 28, 2020). We examined hospitals based on their size, location, trauma certification, median household income, and reliance on public insurance. COVID-19 inpatient burdens (ie, beds occupied by COVID-19 patients), relative to overall facility capacity (ie, total beds), were reported and assessed using thresholds established by the Institute of Health Metrics and Evaluation to approximate the stress induced by different COVID-19 levels. RESULTS: Maximum (ie, peak) daily COVID-19 occupancy averaged 27.5% (SD 11.2%) across the 28 hospitals. However, there was dramatic variation between hospitals, with maximum daily COVID-19 occupancy ranging from 5.7% to 50.0%. Smaller hospitals remained above 20% COVID-19 capacity for longer (small hospital median 27.5 days [interquartile range {IQR}: 4 to 32]; medium hospital median 18.5 days [IQR: 0.5 to 37]; large hospital median 13 days [IQR: 6 to 32]). Trauma centers reached 20% capacity sooner (median 19 days [IQR: 16-25] versus nontrauma median 30 days [IQR: 20 to 128]), remained above 20% capacity for longer (median 31 days [IQR: 11 to 38]; nontrauma median 8 days [IQR: 0 to 30]), and had higher observed burdens relative to their total capacity (median 5.8% [IQR: 2.4% to 8.3%]; nontrauma median 2.5% [IQR: 1.6% to 2.8%]). Urban location was also predictive of higher COVID-19 patient burden (urban median 3.8% [IQR: 2.6% to 6.7%]; suburban median 2.2% [IQR: 1.5% to 2.8%]). Heat map analyses demonstrated that hospitals in lower-income areas and hospitals in areas of higher reliance on public insurance also exhibited substantially higher COVID-19 occupancy and longer periods of higher COVID-19 occupancy. CONCLUSION: Substantial discrepancies in COVID-19 inpatient burdens existed among Philadelphia-region adult acute care facilities during the initial COVID-19 surge. Trauma center status, urban location, low household income, and high reliance on public insurance were associated with both higher COVID-19 burdens and longer periods of high occupancy. Improved data collection and centralized sharing of pandemic-specific data between health care facilities may improve resource balancing and patient care during current and future response efforts.
