Kinetics of the ATP and dATP-mediated formation of a functionally-active RecA-ssDNA complex.

The kinetics of the ATP and dATP-mediated formation of a functionally-active RecA-ssDNA complex were examined by stopped-flow fluorescence spectroscopy, using a modified version of the RecA protein that contains a fluorescent reporter group in the ssDNA binding site. The results indicated that: i) an active RecA-ssDNA complex was formed more rapidly on dT200 than on dT50 when either ATP or dATP was provided as the nucleotide cofactor, and ii) active complex formation occurred more rapidly with dATP than with ATP on either dT50 or dT200. The dependence on both the identity of the nucleotide cofactor and the length of the ssDNA effector indicated that active complex formation occurs by a cooperative mechanism and that dATP is more effective than ATP in mediating the interactions between RecA monomers that drive this process. Interestingly, the time courses of dATP-mediated active complex formation were closely similar to those that were obtained with ATPγS, an effectively non-hydrolyzable ATP analog that strongly stabilizes the active conformation of the RecA-ssDNA complex. These results provide mechanistic insight into the enhanced ssDNA binding and DNA strand exchange activities that are observed when dATP is provided in place of ATP in RecA biochemical assays.

Stimulation of the Streptococcus pneumoniae RecA protein-promoted three-strand exchange reaction by the competence-specific SsbB protein.

The effect of the transformational competence-specific Streptococcus pneumoniae single-stranded DNA binding protein, SpSsbB, on the ATP-dependent three-strand exchange activity of the SpRecA protein was investigated. Although SpRecA exhibited only a trace level of strand exchange activity in the absence of SpSsbB, an extensive strand exchange reaction was observed when SpSsbB was added to the reaction solution after SpRecA. A more limited strand exchange reaction was observed, however, when SpSsbB was added to the reaction solution before SpRecA. This dependence on the order of addition, together with additional DNA-dependent ATP hydrolysis experiments, indicated that the mechanism of stimulation may involve the postsynaptic binding of SpSsbB to the displaced linear single-stranded DNA reaction product. When dATP was provided in place of ATP as the nucleotide cofactor (to suppress a potentially inhibitory effect of SpSsbB on the interaction of SpRecA with the circular ssDNA reaction substrate), the stimulatory effect of SpSsbB on the strand exchange reaction was apparent regardless of the order in which it was added to the reaction solution. These findings suggest that SpSsbB may be able to facilitate SpRecA-promoted DNA recombination reactions during natural transformation in S. pneumoniae.

Altered nucleotide cofactor-dependent properties of the mutant [S240K]RecA protein.

Two mutant Escherichia coli RecA proteins were prepared in which the ATP active site residue, Ser240, was replaced with asparagine and lysine (these amino acids are found in the corresponding positions in other bacterial RecA proteins). The S240N mutation had no discernible effect on the ATP-dependent activities of the RecA protein, indicating that serine and asparagine are functionally interchangeable at position 240. The S240K mutation, in contrast, essentially eliminated the ability of the RecA protein to utilize ATP as a nucleotide cofactor. The [S240K]RecA protein was able to catalyze the hydrolysis of dATP, however, suggesting that the absence of the 2'-hydroxyl group reduced an inhibitory interaction with the Lys240 side chain. Interestingly, the [S240K]RecA protein was able to promote an efficient LexA cleavage reaction but exhibited no strand exchange activity when dATP was provided as the nucleotide cofactor. This apparent separation of function may be attributable to the elevated S(0.5) value for dATP for the [S240K]RecA protein (490 µM, compared to 20-30 µM for the wild type and [S240N]RecA proteins), and may reflect a differential dependence of the LexA co-protease and DNA strand exchange activities on the nucleotide cofactor-mediated stabilization of the functionally-active state of the RecA-ssDNA complex.

DNA binding compatibility of the Streptococcus pneumoniae SsbA and SsbB proteins.

BACKGROUND: Streptococcus pneumoniae has two paralogous, homotetrameric, single-stranded DNA binding (SSB) proteins, designated SsbA and SsbB. Previous studies demonstrated that SsbA and SsbB have different solution-dependent binding mode preferences with variable DNA binding capacities. The impact of these different binding properties on the assembly of multiple SsbAs and SsbBs onto single-stranded DNA was investigated. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: The complexes that were formed by the SsbA and SsbB proteins on dT(n) oligomers of defined lengths were examined by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Complexes containing either two SsbAs or two SsbBs, or mixed complexes containing one SsbA and one SsbB, could be formed readily, provided the dT(n) oligomer was long enough to satisfy the full binding mode capacities of each of the bound proteins under the particular solution conditions. Complexes containing two SsbAs or two SsbBs could also be formed on shorter dT(n) oligomers via a "shared-strand binding" mechanism in which one or both proteins were bound using only a portion of their potential binding capacity. Mixed complexes were not formed on these shorter oligomers, however, indicating that SsbA and SsbB were incompatible for shared-strand binding. Additional experiments suggested that this shared-strand binding incompatibility may be due in part to differences in the structure of a loop region on the outer surface of the subunits of the SsbA and SsbB proteins. CONCLUSION/SIGNIFICANCE: These results indicate that the SsbA and SsbB proteins may co-assemble on longer DNA segments where independent binding is possible, but not on shorter DNA segments where coordinated interactions between adjacent SSBs are required. The apparent compatibility requirement for shared-strand binding could conceivably serve as a self-recognition mechanism that regulates the manner in which SsbA and SsbB interact in S. pneumoniae.

Effect of Mg2+ on the DNA binding modes of the Streptococcus pneumoniae SsbA and SsbB proteins.

The effect of Mg2+ on the binding of the Streptococcus pneumoniae single-stranded DNA binding (SSB) proteins, SsbA and SsbB, to various dT(n) oligomers was examined by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. The results were then compared with those that were obtained with the well characterized SSB protein from Escherichia coli, SsbEc. In the absence of Mg2+, the results indicated that the SsbEc protein was able to bind to the dT(n) oligomers in the SSB(35) mode, with only two of the four subunits of the tetramer interacting with the dT(n) oligomers. In the presence of Mg2+, however, the results indicated that the SsbEc protein was bound to the dT(n) oligomers in the SSB(65) mode, with all four subunits of the tetramer interacting with the dT(n) oligomers. The SsbA protein behaved similarly to the SsbEc protein under all conditions, indicating that it undergoes Mg2+ -dependent changes in its DNA binding modes that are analogous to those of the SsbEc protein. The SsbB protein, in contrast, appeared to bind to the dT(n) oligomers in an SSB(65)-like mode in either the presence or the absence of Mg2+, suggesting that it may not exhibit the pronounced negative intrasubunit cooperativity in the absence of Mg2+ that is required for the formation of the SSB(35) mode. Additional experiments with a chimeric SsbA/B protein indicated that the structural determinants that govern the transitions between the different DNA binding modes may be contained within the N-terminal domains of the SSB proteins.

Expression and purification of the SsbB protein from Streptococcus pneumoniae.

The Gram positive bacterium, Streptococcus pneumoniae, has two genes, designated ssbA and ssbB, which are predicted to encode single-stranded DNA binding proteins (SSB proteins). We have shown previously that the SsbA protein is similar in size and in biochemical properties to the well-characterized SSB protein from Escherichia coli. The SsbB protein, in contrast, is a smaller protein and has no counterpart in E. coli. This report describes the development of an expression system and purification procedure for the SsbB protein. The ssbB gene was amplified from genomic S. pneumoniae DNA and cloned into the E. coli expression vector, pET21a. Although, we had shown previously that the SsbA protein is strongly expressed from pET21a in the E. coli strain BL21(DE3)pLysS, no expression of the SsbB protein was detected in these cells. However, the SsbB protein was strongly expressed from pET21a in the Rosetta(DE3)pLysS strain, a derivative of BL21(DE3)pLysS which supplies the tRNAs for six codons that are used infrequently in E. coli. The differential expression of the two SSB proteins in the parent BL21(DE3)pLysS strain was apparently due to the presence of two rare codons in the ssbB gene sequence that are not present in the ssbA sequence. Using the Rosetta(DE3)pLysS/pETssbB expression system, a protocol was developed in which the SsbB protein was purified to apparent homogeneity. DNA binding assays confirmed that the purified SsbB protein had single-stranded DNA binding activity. The expression and purification procedures reported here will facilitate further investigations into the biological role of the SsbB protein.

Differential single-stranded DNA binding properties of the paralogous SsbA and SsbB proteins from Streptococcus pneumoniae.

The naturally transformable Gram-positive bacterium Streptococcus pneumoniae has two single-stranded DNA-binding (SSB) proteins, designated SsbA and SsbB. The SsbA protein is similar in size to the well characterized SSB protein from Escherichia coli (SsbEc). The SsbB protein, in contrast, is a smaller protein that is specifically induced during natural transformation and has no counterpart in E. coli. In this report, the single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) binding properties of the SsbA and SsbB proteins were examined and compared with those of the SsbEc protein. The ssDNA binding characteristics of the SsbA protein were similar to those of the SsbEc protein in every ssDNA binding assay used in this study. The SsbB protein differed from the SsbA and SsbEc proteins, however, both in its binding to short homopolymeric dT(n) oligomers (as judged by polyacrylamide gel-shift assays) and in its binding to the longer naturally occurring X and M13 ssDNAs (as judged by agarose gel-shift assays and electron microscopic analysis). The results indicate that an individual SsbB protein binds to ssDNA with an affinity that is similar or higher than that of the SsbA and SsbEc proteins. However, the manner in which multiple SsbB proteins assemble onto a ssDNA molecule differs from that observed with the SsbA and SsbEc proteins. These results represent the first analysis of paralogous SSB proteins from any bacterial species and provide a foundation for further investigations into the biological roles of these proteins.

Three-strand exchange by the Escherichia coli RecA protein using ITP as a nucleotide cofactor: mechanistic parallels with the ATP-dependent reaction of the RecA protein from Streptococcus pneumoniae.

The RecA protein from Escherichia coli promotes an ATP-dependent three-strand exchange reaction between a circular single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) and a homologous linear double-stranded (dsDNA). We have now found that under certain conditions, the RecA protein is also able to promote the three-strand exchange reaction using the structurally related nucleoside triphosphate, ITP, as the nucleotide cofactor. However, although both reactions are stimulated by single-stranded DNA-binding (SSB) protein, the ITP-dependent reaction differs from the ATP-dependent reaction in that it is observed only at low SSB protein concentrations, whereas the ATP-dependent reaction proceeds efficiently even at high SSB protein concentrations. Moreover, the circular ssDNA-dependent ITP hydrolysis activity of the RecA protein is strongly inhibited by SSB protein (suggesting that SSB protein displaces RecA protein from ssDNA when ITP is present), whereas the ATP hydrolysis activity is uninhibited even at high SSB protein concentrations (because RecA protein is resistant to displacement by SSB protein when ATP is present). These results suggest that SSB protein does not stimulate the ITP-dependent strand exchange reaction presynaptically (by facilitating the binding of RecA protein to the circular ssDNA substrate) but may act postsynaptically (by binding to the displaced strand that is generated when the circular ssDNA invades the linear dsDNA substrate). Interestingly, the mechanistic characteristics of the ITP-dependent strand exchange reaction of the E. coli RecA protein are similar to those of the ATP-dependent strand exchange reaction of the RecA protein from Streptococcus pneumoniae. These findings are discussed in terms of the relationship between the dynamic state of the RecA-ssDNA filament and the mechanism of the SSB protein-stimulated three-strand exchange reaction.

Effect of the Streptococcus pneumoniae MmsA protein on the RecA protein-promoted three-strand exchange reaction. Implications for the mechanism of transformational recombination.

Streptococcus pneumoniae is a naturally transformable bacterium that is able to incorporate DNA from its environment into its own chromosome. This process, known as transformational recombination, is dependent in part on the mmsA gene, which encodes a protein having a sequence that is 40% identical to that of the Escherichia coli RecG protein, a junction-specific DNA helicase believed to be involved in the branch migration of recombinational intermediates. We have developed an expression system for the MmsA protein and have purified the MmsA protein to more than 99% homogeneity. The MmsA protein has DNA-dependent ATP hydrolysis and DNA junction-helicase activities that are similar to those of the E. coli RecG protein. The effect of the MmsA protein on the S. pneumoniae RecA protein-promoted three-strand exchange reaction was also investigated. In the standard direction (circular single-stranded (ss) DNA + linear double-stranded (ds) DNA --> linear ssDNA + nicked circular dsDNA), the MmsA protein appears to promote the branch migration of partially exchanged intermediates in a direction opposite of the RecA protein, resulting in a nearly complete inhibition of the overall strand exchange reaction. In the reverse direction (linear ssDNA + nicked circular dsDNA --> circular ssDNA + linear dsDNA), however, the MmsA protein appears to facilitate the conversion of partially exchanged intermediates into fully exchanged products, leading to a pronounced stimulation of the overall reaction. These results are discussed in terms of the molecular mechanism of transformational recombination.

Complete inhibition of Streptococcus pneumoniae RecA protein-catalyzed ATP hydrolysis by single-stranded DNA-binding protein (SSB protein): implications for the mechanism of SSB protein-stimulated DNA strand exchange.

The ATP-dependent three-strand exchange activity of the Streptococcus pneumoniae RecA protein (RecA(Sp)), like that of the Escherichia coli RecA protein (RecA(Ec)), is strongly stimulated by the single-stranded DNA-binding protein (SSB) from either E. coli (SSB(Ec)) or S. pneumoniae (SSB(Sp)). The RecA(Sp) protein differs from the RecA(Ec) protein, however, in that its ssDNA-dependent ATP hydrolysis activity is completely inhibited by SSB(Ec) or SSB(Sp) protein, apparently because these proteins displace RecA(Sp) protein from ssDNA. These results indicate that in contrast to the mechanism that has been established for the RecA(Ec) protein, SSB protein does not stimulate the RecA(Sp) protein-promoted strand exchange reaction by facilitating the formation of a presynaptic complex between the RecA(Sp) protein and the ssDNA substrate. In addition to acting presynaptically, however, it has been proposed that SSB(Ec) protein also stimulates the RecA(Ec) protein strand exchange reaction postsynaptically, by binding to the displaced single strand that is generated when the ssDNA substrate invades the homologous linear dsDNA. In the RecA(Sp) protein-promoted reaction, the stimulatory effect of SSB protein may be due entirely to this postsynaptic mechanism. The competing displacement of RecA(Sp) protein from the ssDNA substrate by SSB protein, however, appears to limit the efficiency of the strand exchange reaction (especially at high SSB protein concentrations or when SSB protein is added to the ssDNA before RecA(Sp) protein) relative to that observed under the same conditions with the RecA(Ec) protein.