Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Clin J Oncol Nurs ; 24(3): 328-330, 2020 06 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32441687

ABSTRACT

Hourly rounding by nursing staff helps to proactively manage patient needs and minimize the number of unscheduled calls from patients. The focus of this study was to determine if an increased emphasis on hourly rounding had an effect on call bell usage on an oncology unit. Patient call bell usage requests, such as asking for water or repositioning, and the total number of all alarms, such as bed exit alarms and lavatory assist alarms, decreased. Subsequent patient satisfaction surveys showed an increase in patient perception of how quickly help was received.


Subject(s)
Clinical Alarms/standards , Nursing Staff, Hospital/standards , Oncology Nursing/standards , Patient Safety/standards , Patient Satisfaction/statistics & numerical data , Teaching Rounds/standards , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Clinical Alarms/statistics & numerical data , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Nursing Staff, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Oncology Nursing/statistics & numerical data , Patient Safety/statistics & numerical data , Teaching Rounds/statistics & numerical data , Time Factors , United States
2.
J Ultrasound Med ; 35(11): 2343-2352, 2016 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27629755

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To report our success and complication rates with emergency department (ED) technician-performed ultrasound (US)-guided peripheral intravenous (IV) catheter placement and to compare our results to similar studies in the literature. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of a prospective database of patients who underwent US-guided peripheral IV catheter placement attempts for clinical care in the ED. All patients meeting difficult IV access criteria who had a US-guided peripheral IV catheter placement attempted by a trained ED technician were included. Average attempts per success and overall success rates were compared to similar published studies. RESULTS: There were 830 participants, with an overall success rate of ED technician- performed US-guided peripheral IV catheter placement of 97.5%. Clinicians categorized 82.6% of participants as having difficult IV access and reported that in 46.5%, a central venous catheter would have been necessary if the US-guided peripheral IV catheter failed. Of successful catheter attempts, 86.8% were placed on the first attempt; 11.6% were placed on the second attempt; and 1.6% were placed on the third attempt. For this study, the average number of attempts per success was 1.15 (95% confidence interval, 1.12-1.18), which was lower than in 6 other published studies, ranging from 1.27 to 1.70. The overall success rate of our ED technician-performed attempts was 0.970 (95% confidence interval, 0.956-0.983), which was higher than that reported in previous ED technician studies (0.79-0.80), and closer to that reported for physicians or nurses (0.87-0.97). The arterial puncture complication rate was 0.8%, which was also lower than in other published studies (1.25%-9.80%). CONCLUSIONS: With brief but comprehensive training, ED technicians can successfully obtain US-guided peripheral IV catheter access in patients with difficult IV access.


Subject(s)
Catheterization, Peripheral/statistics & numerical data , Clinical Competence/statistics & numerical data , Emergency Medical Technicians/statistics & numerical data , Ultrasonics/education , Ultrasonography, Interventional/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Catheterization, Peripheral/methods , Child , Female , Humans , Male , Prospective Studies , Retrospective Studies , Ultrasonography, Interventional/methods
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...