Randomized controlled trial of intravenous immunoglobulin for autoimmune postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (iSTAND).

OBJECTIVE: This study assesses response to intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) in presumed autoimmune postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS). BACKGROUND: POTS may be associated with autoimmune disorders, serum autoantibodies, or recent infection. Uncontrolled case studies suggest that IVIG is beneficial for treating autoimmune POTS. No previous randomized controlled trials have been conducted. METHODS: This single-site randomized controlled trial compared IVIG with intravenous albumin infusions. Albumin comparator ensured blinding and control for effects of volume expansion. Eligible patients with POTS had COMPASS-31 total weighted score ≥ 40 and met predetermined criteria suggesting autoimmunity. Over 12 weeks, participants received eight infusions (0.4 gm/kg each). Four infusions were given weekly followed by four infusions every other week. Primary outcome measure was improvement in COMPASS-31 2 weeks after final infusion. RESULTS: A total of 50 participants consented; 30 met inclusion criteria and received study drug (16 IVIG and 14 albumin; 29 female). Group baseline characteristics were well matched; 27 participants completed treatment protocol. Change in COMPASS-31 did not differ between groups (median change [IQR]; IVIG: -5.5 [-23.3, 2.5] versus albumin: -10.6 [-14.1, -4.7]; p-value = 0.629). The IVIG group had a higher response rate (46.7% versus 38.5%), but this was not statistically significant. Adverse events were common but usually mild and did not differ between treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: This small randomized controlled trial of IVIG in POTS found no statistical difference in response compared with albumin infusion. Both groups showed improvement possibly related to volume expansion or other effects obscuring group differences. These findings inform development of future immunomodulatory clinical trials in POTS.

Limb myorhythmia treated with chemodenervation: a case report.

We describe a case of limb myorhythmia successfully palliated with botulinum toxin injections. The patient is a 30-year-old male evaluated for abnormal movements of the left lower foot that began after an ankle injury for which the patient underwent Achilles tendon scar tissue debridement without improvement. On examination, he had near-constant involuntary, slow, rhythmic flexion/extension tremor of toes 2-4 that was diminished during active movement. Needle electromyography (EMG) revealed a rhythmic, 2-3 Hz tremor isolated to the flexor digitorum brevis. After failure of medical management with muscle relaxants, gabapentin, and levodopa trials, the patient underwent two EMG-guided chemodenervation procedures with incobotulinum toxin A injections of the left flexor digitorum brevis. At 3-month follow-up, he had achieved a sustained 50% reduction in the intensity of the movements and improved quality of life. Myorhythmia is a rare condition characterized by a repetitive, rhythmic, slow frequency (1-4 Hz) movement affecting the cranial and limb muscles. The most common causes include stroke, demyelinating disorders, drug or toxin intake, trauma, and infections. The management of this condition is very limited with pharmacologic agents such as anticholinergics, antispasmodics, anticonvulsants, or dopaminergic agents showing limited efficacy. The use of botulinum toxin chemodenervation aided by EMG muscle targeting can be a useful therapeutic intervention in cases of medication-refractory regionally distributed myorhythmia involving accessible muscles.

Ganglionic Acetylcholine Receptor Antibodies in Postural Tachycardia Syndrome.

OBJECTIVE: Postural tachycardia syndrome (POTS), the most common form of dysautonomia, may be associated with autoimmunity in some cases. Autoantibodies against the ganglionic acetylcholine receptor (gAChR) have been reported in a minority of patients with POTS, but the prevalence and clinical relevance is unclear. METHODS: Clinical information and serum samples were systematically collected from participants with POTS and healthy control volunteers (n = 294). The level of positive gAChR antibodies was classified as very low (0.02-0.05 nmol/L), low (0.05-0.2 nmol/L), and high (>0.2 nmol/L). RESULTS: Fifteen of 217 patients with POTS (7%) had gAChR antibodies (8 very low and 7 low). Six of the 77 healthy controls (8%) were positive (3 very low and 3 low). There were no clinical differences between seropositive and seronegative patients with POTS. CONCLUSIONS: Prevalence of gAChR antibody did not differ between POTS and healthy controls, and none had high antibody levels. Patients with POTS were not clinically different based on seropositivity. Low levels of gAChR antibodies are not clinically important in POTS.

A comparison of health-related quality of life in autonomic disorders: postural tachycardia syndrome versus vasovagal syncope.

PURPOSE: Postural tachycardia syndrome (POTS) and vasovagal syncope (VVS) are two disorders of orthostatic intolerance which are often misdiagnosed as the other. In each case, patients experience a reduced health-related quality of life (HRQoL) compared to healthy populations. This study was conducted to test the hypothesis that HRQoL is worse in POTS. METHODS: POTS patients were recruited from the Dysautonomia International Annual Patient and Caregiver Conference. VVS patient data came from those enrolled in the Second Prevention of Syncope Trial. Participants aged ≥ 18 years (177 POTS and 72 VVS) completed the RAND 36-Item Health Survey, a generic and coherent health-related quality of life survey. RESULTS: POTS patients reported reduced HRQoL compared to VVS patients in physical functioning (42.5 ± 1.7 vs. 76.5 ± 2.9, p < 0.001), role limitations due to physical health (11.4 ± 1.9 vs. 33.0 ± 5.0, p < 0.001), energy and fatigue (27.2 ± 1.3 vs. 50.7 ± 2.6, p < 0.001), social functioning (45.2 ± 1.8 vs. 71.2 ± 2.9, p < 0.001), pain (48.8 ± 1.9 vs. 67.7 ± 2.9, p < 0.001), and general health (31.2 ± 1.5 vs. 60.5 ± 2.6, p < 0.001) domains. Scores did not differ significantly in the role limitations due to emotional health (p = 0.052) and emotional well-being (p = 0.271) domains. Physical and general health composite scores were lower in the POTS population, while mental health composite scores were not different. CONCLUSION: Differences in HRQoL exist between these patient populations. POTS patients report lower scores in physical and general health domains than VVS patients, but emotional health domains do not differ significantly. Targeting physical functioning in these patients may help improve quality of life.

Quantitative assessment of diabetic amyotrophy using magnetic resonance neurography-a case-control analysis.

OBJECTIVES: To quantitatively characterize diabetic amyotrophy (DA), or diabetic lumbosacral radiculoplexopathy, and compare with controls using magnetic resonance neurography (MRN). METHODS: Forty controls and 23 DA cases were analyzed qualitatively and quantitatively. Cross-sectional areas (CSAs) of bilateral L3 through S2 lumbosacral nerve roots, femoral nerves, and sciatic nerves (proximal and distal measurements) were measured. A linear model was used to assess the nerve location and case/control effect on angle-corrected CSAs. Intra- and inter-reader analysis was performed using intraclass correlation (ICC). RESULTS: In DA cases, abnormalities of the lumbosacral nerve roots, sciatic, femoral, and obturator nerves were seen in 21/23, 16/23, 21/23, and 9/23, respectively. Denervation abnormalities of multiple abdominopelvic muscles were seen. Quantitatively, the CSA of all measured LS plexus nerve roots and bilateral femoral nerves were significantly larger in DA cases vs. controls by 45% (95% CI, (30%, 49%); p < 0.001). The ICC was moderate for inter-rater analysis = 0.547 (95% CI, 0.456-0.626) and excellent for intra-rater analysis = 0.90 (95% CI, 0.89-92). CONCLUSIONS: Multifocal neuromuscular lesions related to diabetic amyotrophy were qualitatively and quantitatively detected on MRN. Qualitative abnormalities distinguished cases from controls, and nerve CSAs of cases were significantly larger than those of controls. Therefore, MRN may be employed as a non-invasive diagnostic tool for the evaluation of diabetic amyotrophy. KEY POINTS: • Qualitative abnormalities of lumbosacral nerve roots, their peripheral branches, and muscles are seen in DA. • The lumbosacral nerve roots and their peripheral branches in diabetic amyotrophy cases are significantly larger in cross-sectional area than non-diabetic subjects by 45% (95 CI, 30%, 49%; p < 0.001). • The ICC was moderate for inter-rater analysis = 0.547 (95% CI, 0.456-0.626) and excellent for intra-rater analysis = 0.90 (95% CI, 0.89-92).

Postural Orthostatic Tachycardia Syndrome: JACC Focus Seminar.

Postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS), the most common form of orthostatic intolerance in young people, affects approximately 500,000 people in the United States alone, typically young women at the peak of their education and the beginning of their working lives. This is a heterogeneous disorder, the pathophysiology and mechanisms of which are not well understood. There are multiple contributing factors and numerous potential mimics. This review details the most current views on the potential causes, comorbid conditions, proposed subtypes, differential diagnoses, evaluations, and treatment of POTS from cardiological and neurological perspectives.

Seronegative autoimmune autonomic neuropathy: a distinct clinical entity.

PURPOSE: Autoimmune autonomic ganglionopathy (AAG) is associated with ganglionic acetylcholine receptor (gAChR) antibodies. We describe a similar but distinct series of patients with autoimmune autonomic failure lacking this antibody. METHODS: Retrospective chart review. RESULTS: Six patients presented with subacute autonomic failure, seronegative for gAChR antibodies. Orthostatic hypotension and gastrointestinal complaints were common. Autonomic testing revealed predominant sympathetic failure and no premature pupillary redilation. All patients had sensory symptoms and/or pain, which was severe in three. Immunotherapy with plasma exchange, intravenous immunoglobulin, and rituximab was ineffective. Three patients responded to intravenous steroids. CONCLUSION: In these cases of autoimmune autonomic failure, key differences from seropositive AAG emerge. Testing showed prominent sympathetic (rather than cholinergic) failure, specific pupillary findings of AAG were absent, and sensory symptoms were prominent. AAG responds to antibody-targeted immunotherapy, while these patients responded best to steroids. This seronegative autoimmune autonomic neuropathy is a distinct clinical entity requiring a different treatment approach from AAG.