Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Aust N Z J Surg ; 70(7): 480-4, 2000 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10901573

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Allograft donations are not uncommonly found to be contaminated. The issue of contaminated donations from live donors at the time of surgery, and the significance of this to the patient in terms of subsequent sepsis of the arthroplasty, were examined. METHODS: The donations of femoral heads to the Queensland Bone Bank over a 9-year period were reviewed, and the incidence and bacteriology of contamination were detailed. Clinical outcomes were determined for donors who had positive cultures at the time of retrieval and they were compared with those of culture-negative donors. RESULTS: Between March 1987 and February 1996, 232 femoral heads were donated to the Queensland Bone Bank. Four specimens were sent for culture with each femoral head (surface swab of femoral head, acetabular swab, bone biopsy and capsule). In 51 cases, one or more positive cultures were obtained (22% contamination rate). The majority of organisms cultured were Staphylococcus epidermidis. One hundred and seventy donations came from surgery performed at the Princess Alexandra Hospital, and 40 femoral heads were considered contaminated. Deep infection was recorded in one of the 40 cases with contaminated donations and three out of 130 non-contaminated donations had subsequent septic episodes. CONCLUSION: The contamination rate detailed in the present report is higher than in most series. This may be due to the fact that four bacteriological specimens are taken to assess contamination. Two of these specimens are tissue samples which yielded more positive results than did the two swabs. All other series take no more than two bacteriological specimens, which are usually bone swabs. These are shown to have a poor yield of positive cultures. Therefore there is a significant underestimation of contamination rates by other bone banks. This has implications for the recipients of bone from those banks, particularly when the allograft material is not secondarily sterilized. This is important given increasing allograft usage, and the increasing numbers of revision joint arthroplasty and impaction grafting procedures being performed. Sterilization of all bone by irradiation to 25 kGy is recommended.


Subject(s)
Bacteria/classification , Bone Banks , Femur Head/microbiology , Acetabulum/microbiology , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Arthroplasty/adverse effects , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip , Biopsy , Bone Diseases/microbiology , Bone Transplantation , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Incidence , Joint Capsule/microbiology , Living Donors , Male , Middle Aged , Prosthesis-Related Infections/etiology , Sepsis/classification , Staphylococcus epidermidis/classification , Sterilization , Surgical Wound Infection/etiology , Transplantation, Homologous , Treatment Outcome
2.
J Arthroplasty ; 14(6): 677-81, 1999 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10512439

ABSTRACT

A retrospective study of allograft bone retrieved from 401 donors between January 1987 and March 1996 was performed to determine the incidence of bacterial contamination. Contamination according to type of donor (live, multiorgan, cadaveric) was also determined. Live donors donating a femoral head demonstrated a contamination rate of 13%; multiorgan donors, 24%; and cadaveric donors, 35%. Donor contamination by type of bone (hemipelvis, femur, tibia) showed no significant difference in the multiorgan donors. In cadaveric donors, there was a significant increase in contamination of the hemipelves as compared to the femur and tibias. Recommendations for contamination control in allograft retrieval are given. Our findings are of great significance for musculoskeletal banks that do not secondarily irradiate and rely on screening of allograft bone for contamination alone.


Subject(s)
Bacterial Infections/etiology , Bone Transplantation , Intraoperative Complications , Tissue and Organ Harvesting , Bacteria/isolation & purification , Femur Head/transplantation , Humans , Living Donors , Retrospective Studies , Tissue Banks/standards , Tissue and Organ Harvesting/standards , Transplantation, Homologous
3.
Bull Hosp Jt Dis ; 57(1): 39-46, 1998.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9553701

ABSTRACT

The development of bone and tissue banking in Australia over the last decade is described and details of the administrative structure, donor and recipient testing protocols, allograft segment processing procedures, and internal audit safety arrangements are also provided. Demographic data concerning both the retrieval and dispersal of musculoskeletal allograft materials in Australia are also discussed. Current price schedules for a variety of allograft materials available in Australia are made available for international comparison.


Subject(s)
Bone Banks/organization & administration , Tissue Banks/organization & administration , Australia , Bone Banks/standards , Communicable Disease Control , Humans , Quality Control , Tissue Banks/standards , Tissue Donors , Tissue Transplantation/economics , Tissue Transplantation/standards , Tissue and Organ Procurement/organization & administration , Tissue and Organ Procurement/standards , Transplantation, Autologous/economics , Transplantation, Autologous/standards
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...