ABSTRACT
Glioblastoma (GBM) is an aggressive and highly heterogeneous primary brain tumor. Glioma stem cells represent a subpopulation of tumor cells with stem cell traits that are presumed to be the cause of tumor relapse. There exists complex tumor heterogeneity in drug sensitivity patterns between glioma stem cell (GSC) cultures derived from different patients. Here, we describe that heterogeneity also exists between GSC cultures derived from multiple biopsies within a single tumor. From biopsies harvested within spatially distinct regions representing the entire tumor mass, we established seven GSC cultures and compared their stem cell properties, mutations, gene expression profiles, and drug sensitivity patterns against 115 different anticancer drugs. The results were compared to 14 GSC cultures derived from other patients. Between the multiregional-derived GSC cultures, we observed only minor differences in their phenotype, proliferative capacity, and global gene expression. Further, they displayed intratumoral heterogeneity in mutational profiles and sensitivity patterns to anticancer drugs. This heterogeneity, however, did not exceed the extensive heterogeneity found between GSC cultures derived from other GBM patients. Our results suggest that the use of GSC cultures from one single focal biopsy may underestimate the overall complexity of the GSC population and display the importance of including GSC cultures reflecting the entire tumor mass in drug screening strategies.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Despite the well described heterogeneity in glioblastoma (GBM), treatment is standardized, and clinical trials investigate treatment effects at population level. Genomics-driven oncology for stratified treatments allow clinical decision making in only a small minority of screened patients. Addressing tumor heterogeneity, we aimed to establish a clinical translational protocol in recurrent GBM (recGBM) utilizing autologous glioblastoma stem cell (GSC) cultures and automated high-throughput drug sensitivity and resistance testing (DSRT) for individualized treatment within the time available for clinical application. RESULTS: From ten patients undergoing surgery for recGBM, we established individual cell cultures and characterized the GSCs by functional assays. 7/10 GSC cultures could be serially expanded. The individual GSCs displayed intertumoral differences in their proliferative capacity, expression of stem cell markers and variation in their in vitro and in vivo morphology. We defined a time frame of 10 weeks from surgery to complete the entire pre-clinical work-up; establish individualized GSC cultures, evaluate drug sensitivity patterns of 525 anticancer drugs, and identify options for individualized treatment. Within the time frame for clinical translation 5/7 cultures reached sufficient cell yield for complete drug screening. The DSRT revealed significant intertumoral heterogeneity to anticancer drugs (p < 0.0001). Using curated reference databases of drug sensitivity in GBM and healthy bone marrow cells, we identified individualized treatment options in all patients. Individualized treatment options could be selected from FDA-approved drugs from a variety of different drug classes in all cases. CONCLUSIONS: In recGBM, GSC cultures could successfully be established in the majority of patients. The individual cultures displayed intertumoral heterogeneity in their in vitro and in vivo behavior. Within a time frame for clinical application, we could perform DSRT in 50% of recGBM patients. The DSRT revealed a remarkable intertumoral heterogeneity in sensitivity to anticancer drugs in recGBM that could allow tailored therapeutic options for functional precision medicine.
