Human contrast sensitivity in coherent Maxwellian view: effect of coherent noise and comparison with speckle.

Lasers have been used in vision for measuring the neural contrast sensitivity function (CSF) by forming interference fringes on the retina. We distinguish among three kinds of illumination with lasers: incoherent (without noise), Maxwellian or coherent (with coherent noise), and diffuse coherent (with speckle). The three have different characteristics and different CSF's. A coherent imaging system is designed to measure the CSF with fully coherent illumination. This is the CSF of the whole visual system, although it is measured with gratings imaged on the retina. It therefore differs from the neural CSF's measured by other authors with partially coherent illumination. However, the neural CSF's are also obtained in this study with and without noise. The effects of coherent noise and speckle on both the visual system and neural sensitivities are studied and compared. Coherent noise differs from speckle in the following ways: (1) It behaves as a high-pass filter, reducing sensitivity in the low-spatial-frequency range, whereas speckle is a low-pass filter; (2) quantitatively, coherent noise reduces neural sensitivity by a factor k(m) with a maximum value between 4 and 6, whereas speckle reduces neural sensitivity by a factor ks with a maximum value of approximately 25 (1.4 log units) for a 3-mm pupil and up to 35 (1.55 log units) for a 1-mm pupil; (3) the masking effect of the coherent noise is affected by changes in luminance but not by changes in pupil diameter; however, the pupil size is the main parameter affecting the masking effect of the speckle.

Contrast sensitivity of the visual system in speckle imagery.

The contrast sensitivity function (CSF) of the whole visual system is determined with the use of coherent diffuse illumination. This function provides supplementary data about the effect of speckle on the ability of the visual system to perceive the spatial information contained in an image. The results show that speckle not only prevents perception of the finest details (highest frequencies) but also reduces the visibility of lower frequencies (especially where contrast is low). The difference between the CSF's determined with and without speckle is quantitatively very important. And the ratio between the two CSF's is a measure of the retinal ability to perceive contrast in the presence of speckle noise. The influence of the pupil size and luminance level on the CSF with speckle is studied and compared with the influence of the same parameters on the classical CSF.

Influence of the contrast sensitivity function on the reaction time.

The reaction time (RT) vs spatial frequency (SF) curve is determined, using gratings from 1 to 40 c/deg, at seven different contrast levels between 0.95 and 0.02. The form of the RT/SF function: (a) replicated the inverse of the contrast sensitivity function (CSF) at near threshold contrast levels; (b) behaved differently at higher contrasts, exhibiting two branches at contrast close to 1. The interpretation is that there are two factors determining this function: (1) the transition from the operation of fast transient channels at low SF to the operation of slow sustained channels at high SF, the transition taking place within a narrow SF band close to 6 or 8 c/deg (depending on the subject) and (2) the contrast attenuation by the optical and neural transfer function, operating throughout the SF range. At high contrasts, the effect of the first factor can be clearly observed, because the effect of the second factor does not change with spatial frequency except in a region where the RT/SF function changes rapidly. At lower contrasts, however, the second factor becomes increasingly relevant while the first becomes less and less observable.