Bridging the gap of knowledge and skills for diagnosis and treatment of painful neuropathy: Development and evaluation of pain education project for clinicians in primary care settings.

The importance of pain education is widely accepted and recognized. This is a key part of educating the undergraduate and postgraduate healthcare workforce is an essential strategy for promoting effective pain practice. This study aims to evaluate the pain management module training courses for newly graduated doctors to address the knowledge gap between specialist care and primary care physicians. This was an observational study of an evaluation of a pain education project focused on neuropathic pain management core competency was provided. Multimodal teaching approaches such as didactic teaching and vignettes of cases discussion, video teaching, and learning module. A pretest survey was carried out to assess the baseline knowledge of the participants. Completion of the post-test and participant experience questionnaire were collected. Comparison of the pre-and post-test scores for all participants was undertaken using the Wilcoxon signed-ranked test with effect size calculated. The participant's experience questionnaire scores were analyzed descriptively to produce mean and standard deviations from each question. A total of 274 participants completed all of the course sections from the average of 350 eligible participants. Of 274 participants, more than half were female (64.96%), with more than half participants being General Practitioner (54.38%) followed by a neurologist (35.04%). For all sessions, a Wilcoxon signed-rank test outlined that differences between all pre-and post-test scores were significant (P < .001). There was a marked improvement in the post-test as evidenced by statistically significant increases in mean scores differences. We developed an educational training courses for physicians to address the limitation in existing medical undergraduate training of neuropathic pain management. The training led to improvement in participant's knowledge and skills with positive outcomes.

Persistent neurological manifestations in long COVID-19 syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Several studies have reported prolonged symptoms especially neurological symptoms following acute infection in patients with COVID-19, known as long COVID-19. There are only few studies investigating this population and relatively less known, including nervous system involvement. A systematic review and meta-analysis of these studies are required to understanding the prevalence of persistent neurological manifestations after COVID-19. OBJECTIVE: To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis on the persistent neurological manifestations in COVID-19 survivors. METHODS: Authors conducted a literature search through PubMed and MedRxiv from January 1st, 2020 to October 2021 according to PRISMA guideline. Furthermore, the authors added additional sources by reviewing related references. Studies presenting the neurologic features of long COVID-19 patients in their data were included. Case reports and case series also included in this review. The quality of the studies was assessed based on the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine guidelines. Selected studies were included in the meta-analysis of proportion and heterogeneity test. FINDINGS: From 128 identified studies, 36 were eligible, with 9944 participants included. Most of the included studies had mean duration of follow-up after COVID-19 onset of less than 6 months. Fatigue was the most common (52.8%, 95%CI 19.9 - 84.4) symptoms of long COVID, followed by cognitive disorder (35.4%, 95%CI 2.1 - 81.7); paresthesia (33.3%, 95%CI 2.7 - 76.6); sleep disorder (32.9%, 95%CI 6.5 - 67.4); musculoskeletal pain (27.8%, 95%CI 12.7 - 46); and dizziness (26.4%, 95%CI 4.6 - 57.9). CONCLUSION: Neurological manifestations are prevalent and persisting in patients with long COVID. The duration of the symptoms are vary among literatures. However, the frequency are mostly observed during the first six months after the illness onset.

Interleukin-6 (IL-6) inhibitors as therapeutic agents for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): A systematic review and meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Preliminary studies showed that coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) disrupts body immune system, including dysregulation of cytokine interleukin-6 (IL-6). IL-6 inhibitors agents have been used as treatment options for COVID-19, yet their benefit as therapeutic agents remains unclear. OBJECTIVE: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to synthesize the available evidence on the potential therapeutic effect of IL-6 inhibitor agents for the treatment of COVID-19. METHODS: Two authors initially screened and reviewed the relevant studies from available databases. The data extracted will be tabulated and analyzed for the outcomes. The primary outcome was mortality. Secondary outcomes included discharge from the hospital, length of stay, and requirement for mechanical ventilation. The quality of each study was assessed using OCEBM ratings. RESULTS: We reviewed 18 studies with a total of 3303 subjects. Tocilizumab was the most commonly used in the studies (15 studies). Meta-analysis of included studies revealed significant reduction in mortality with tocilizumab and sarilumab (RR = 0.61, 95% CI 0.49-0.76). Other outcomes including hospital discharge (RR = 1.04, 95% CI 0.86-1.24), length of stay (mean difference -1.96 days, 95% CI -4.24 to 0.33) or requirement for mechanical ventilation (RR = 0.68, 95% CI 0.32-1.45) revealed no differences of IL-6 inhibitor agents compared to controls. CONCLUSIONS: Available evidence suggests that IL-6 inhibitor agents reduce the risk of mortality in COVID-19, especially in severe conditions. Further well-designed trials are needed for assessing its efficacy and safety for COVID-19.

Neurologic Characteristics in Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19): A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Importance: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a newly emerging infectious disease that has caused a global pandemic. The presenting symptoms are mainly respiratory symptom, yet studies have reported nervous system involvement in the disease. A systematic review and meta-analysis of these studies are required to understanding the neurologic characteristic of the disease and help physicians with early diagnosis and management. Objective: To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis on the neurologic characteristics in patients with COVID-19. Evidence Review: Authors conducted a literature search through PubMed from January 1st, 2020 to April 8th, 2020. Furthermore, the authors added additional sources by reviewing related references. Studies presenting the neurologic features of COVID-19 patients in their data were included. Case reports and case series were also included in this review. The quality of the studies was assessed based on the Oxford Center for Evidence-Based Medicine guidelines. Selected studies were included in the meta-analysis of proportion and the heterogeneity test. Finding: From 280 identified studies, 33 were eligible, with 7,559 participants included. Most of the included studies were from China (29 [88%]). Muscle injury or myalgia was the most common (19.2%, 95%CI 15.4-23.2%) neurologic symptom of COVID-19, followed by headache (10.9%, 95%CI 8.62-13.51%); dizziness (8.7%, 95%CI 5.02-13.43%); nausea with or without vomiting (4.6%, 95%CI 3.17-6.27%); concurrent cerebrovascular disease (4.4%, 95%CI 1.92-7.91%); and impaired consciousness (3.8%, 95%CI 0.16-12.04%). Underlying cerebrovascular disease was found in 8.5% (95%CI 4.5-13.5%) of the studies. Conclusion: Neurologic findings vary from non-specific to specific symptoms in COVID-19 patients. Some severe symptoms or diseases can present in the later stage of the disease. Physicians should be aware of the presence of neurologic signs and symptoms as a chief complaint of COVID-19, in order to improve management and prevent a worsening outcome of the patients.