The Impact of Delays in Interfaculty Transfer on Outcomes in Elderly Trauma Patients.

BACKGROUND: Delay to definitive treatment is a significant and persistent challenge to trauma systems across the United States, especially in rural communities with limited resources. We hypothesized that elderly trauma patients with delay in transfer would have increased morbidity and mortality. This study evaluates the relationship between inter-facility transfer time and outcomes in elderly trauma patients, and the validity of the 4-hour dwell time as a performance improvement benchmark. METHODS: The National Trauma Registry and Emergency Medical Services Database were queried from January 2010 to January 2018. Inclusion criteria included age ≥65, blunt mechanism, and transfer from another facility. Correlation analysis was used to evaluate the association between clinical and demographic variables and transfer time. Multicollinearity was evaluated using the variance inflation factor. RESULTS: 1535 patients were identified. This cohort was further subdivided into 4 cohorts based on dwell time: 0-1.5 hours (n = 384), ≥1.5-1.9 hours (n = 379), 1.9-<2.5 hours (n = 383), and ≥2.5 hours (n = 388). Analysis revealed that shorter dwell time was associated with male gender (P = .0039), higher ISS (injury severity score) (P < .0001), lower RTS (revised trauma score) (P < .0001), higher pre-hospital arrest (P = .0066), lower initial GCS (Glasgow Coma Scale) (P = .0012), higher mortality, longer ICU, and ventilator length of stay (P < .0001). Longer dwell times were associated with discharge from the hospital to home or skilled nursing facility as well as lower mortality (P < .0001). DISCUSSION: Longer dwell time was inversely related to outcome. More severely injured patients were rapidly transferred. This represents a mature rural trauma system. In addition, dwell time should be scrutinized as a meaningful indicator within a performance improvement program.

Improvement in Surgical Quality Following Pancreaticoduodenectomy With Increasing Case Volume in a Rural Hospital.

BACKGROUND: The literature is replete with studies that define the nexus of quantity and quality in complex surgical operations. These observations have heralded a call for centralization of care to high-volume centers. The purpose of this study was to chronicle improvements in quality associated with pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) as a rural hospital matures from a low- to very high-volume center. METHODS: A retrospective review of a prospective pancreatic surgery database was undertaken from July 2007 to June 2020. Annual periods were characterized as low (≤12/year), high (13-29/year), and very high volume (≥30/year). Data for the following quality benchmarks were aggregated and compared: length of stay (LOS), 30-day readmissions, 30-day mortality, and 1- and 3-year survival. A subgroup analysis was undertaken in those patients undergoing PD for adenocarcinoma detailing margin status and number of lymph nodes harvested. Outcomes were compared using the Fisher's exact and Student's t-test. RESULTS: 375 PD were completed over the 13-year period; 62.1% were undertaken for ductal adenocarcinoma. There was a significant decrease in LOS and 30-day readmissions as the institution matured toward very high volume. There were no significant differences in 30-day mortality, 1- and 3-year survival, or margin negativity rates associated with volume. Extent of lymph node harvest significantly improved as institutional experience increased. DISCUSSION: Our pancreatic surgery program matured rapidly from low to very high volume with institutional commitment and dedicated resources. As the institution matured, operational efficiencies and surgical quality improved. Not unexpectedly, biology trumped volume as reflected in 1- and 3-year survival rates.