CT-SPECT fusion plus conjugate views for determining dosimetry in iodine-131-monoclonal antibody therapy of lymphoma patients.

UNLABELLED: A method for performing 131I quantitative SPECT imaging is described which uses the superimposition of markers placed on the skin to accomplish fusion of computed tomography (CT) and SPECT image sets. METHODS: To calculate mean absorbed dose after administration of one of two 131I-labeled monoclonal antibodies (Mabs), the shape of the time-activity curve is measured by daily diagnostic conjugate views, the y-axis of that curve is normalized by a quantitative SPECT measurement (usually intra-therapy), and the tumor mass is deduced from a concurrent CT volume measurement. The method is applied to six B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma patients. RESULTS: For four tumors in three patients treated with the MB1 Mab, a correlation appears to be present between resulting mean absorbed dose and disease response. Including all dosimetric estimates for both antibodies, the range for the specific absorbed dose is within that found by others in treating B-cell lymphoma patients. Excluding a retreated anti-B1 patient, the tumor-specific absorbed dose during anti-B1 therapy is from 1.4 to 1.7 mGy/MBq. For the one anti-B1 patient, where quantitative SPECT and conjugate-view imaging was carried out back to back, the quantitative SPECT-measured activity was somewhat less for the spleen and much less for the tumor than that from conjugate views. CONCLUSION: The quantitative SPECT plus conjugate views method may be of general utility for macro-dosimetry of 131I therapies.

Importance of intra-therapy single-photon emission tomographic imaging in calculating tumour dosimetry for a lymphoma patient.

The dosimetry for two, similarly sized tumours in a lymphoma patient being treated with non-bone marrow ablative, monoclonal antibody therapy is reported. The 45-year-old man was infused with 2.48 GBq (67 mCi) of 131I-labelled MB-1. Prior to therapy, a time series of diagnostic conjugate-view images and a radionuclide transmission scan were obtained and processed to obtain time-activity curves. Starting 2 days after the therapeutic infusion of radioactivity, a second conjugate-view time series was obtained. At that time, a quantitative single-photon emission tomography (SPET) acquisition was also carried out. Pre- and post-therapy X-ray computed tomography scans demonstrated a percentage reduction in volume for the right tumour which was 3.8 times that for the left tumour. In contrast, diagnostic conjugate views by themselves estimated the absorbed dose to be the same for the two tumours. Addition of therapy conjugate-view data increased the right-over-left ratio but only to 1.22. Normalizing either time-activity series by the intra-therapy SPET results increased the ratio to greater than 1.5. We assume here that a differential dose is correct according to the differential tumour shirnkage. One can further assume that the largest ratio corresponds most certainly to the most accurate dosimetric method. Other assumptions are possible. While additional study is essential, data from this patient suggest that the preferred dosimetric method is intra-therapy SPET normalization of either time series.