Age-specific prognostication after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest - The ethical dilemma between 'life-sustaining treatment' and 'the right to die' in the elderly.

BACKGROUND: While prognostic values on survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest have been well investigated, less attention has been paid to their age-specific relevance. Therefore, we aimed to identify suitable age-specific early prognostication in elderly patients suffering out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in order to reduce the burden of unnecessary treatment and harm. METHODS: In a prospective population-based observational trial on individuals suffering out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, a total of 2223 patients receiving resuscitation attempts by the local emergency medical service in Vienna, Austria, were enrolled. Patients were stratified according to age as follows: young and middle-aged individuals (<65 years), young old individuals (65-74 years), old individuals (75-84 years) and very old individuals (>85 years). RESULTS: There was an increasing rate of 30-day mortality (+21.8%, p < 0.001) and unfavourable neurological outcome (+18.8%, p < 0.001) with increasing age among age groups. Established predictive variables lost their prognostic potential with increasing age, even after adjusting for potential confounders. Independently, an initially shockable electrocardiogram proved to be directly associated with survival, with an adjusted hazard ratio (HR) of 2.04 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.89-2.38, p = 0.003) for >85-year-olds. Frailty was directly associated with mortality (HR 1.22, 95% CI 1.01-1.51, p = 0.049), showing a 30-day survival of 5.6% and a favourable neurological outcome of 1.1% among elderly individuals. CONCLUSION: An initially shockable electrocardiogram proved to be a suitable tool for risk assessment and decision making in order to predict a successful outcome in elderly victims of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. However, the outcomes of elderly patients seemed to be exceptionally poor in frail individuals and need to be considered in order to reduce unnecessary treatment decisions.

Editor's Choice-Progress in the chain of survival and its impact on outcomes of patients admitted to a specialized high-volume cardiac arrest center during the past two decades.

AIM: Cardiac arrest (CA) is still associated with high mortality and morbidity. Data on the changes in management and outcomes over a long period of time are limited. Using data from a single emergency department (ED), we assessed changes over two decades. METHODS: In this single-center observational study, we prospectively included 4133 patients receiving cardiopulmonary resuscitation and being admitted to the ED of a tertiary care hospital between January 1992 and December 2012. RESULTS: There was a significant improvement in both 6-month survival rates (+10.8%; p < 0.001) and favorable neurological outcome (+4.7%; p < 0.001). While the number of witnessed CA cases decreased (-4.7%; p < 0.001) the proportion of patients receiving bystander basic life support increased (+8.3%; p < 0.001). The proportion of patients with initially shockable ECG rhythms remained unchanged, but cardiovascular causes of CA decreased (-9.6%; p < 0.001). Interestingly, the time from CA until ED admission increased (+0.1 hours; p = 0.024). The use of percutaneous coronary intervention and therapeutic hypothermia were significantly associated with survival. CONCLUSIONS: Outcomes of patients with CA treated at a specialized ED have improved significantly within the last 20 years. Improvements in every link in the chain of survival were noted.

Mechanical chest compression does not seem to improve outcome after out-of hospital cardiac arrest. A single center observational trial.

AIM: Recently three large post product placement studies, comparing mechanical chest compression (cc) devices to those who received manual cc, found equivalent outcome results for both groups. Thus the question arises whether those results could be replicated using the devices on a daily routine. METHODS: We prospectively enrolled 948 patients over a 12 months period. Chi-Square test and Mann-Whitney-U test were used to assess differences between "manual" and "mechanical" cc subgroups. Uni- and multivariate Cox regression hazard analysis were used to assess the influence of cc type on survival. RESULTS: A mechanical cc device was used in 30.1% (n=283) cases. Patients who received mechanical cc had a significantly worse neurological outcome - measured in cerebral performance category (CPC) - than the manual cc group (56.8% vs. 78.6%, p=0.009). Patients receiving mechanical cc were significantly younger, more were male and were more likely to have bystander CPR and an initially shock-able ECG rhythm. There was no difference in the quality of CPR that might explain the worse outcome in mechanical cc patients. CONCLUSION: Even with high quality CPR in both, manual and mechanical cc groups, outcome in patients who received mechanical cc was significantly worse. The anticipated benefits of a higher compression ratio and a steadier compression depth of a mechanical cc device remain uncertain. In this study selection for mechanical cc was not standardized, and was non-random. This merits further investigation. Further research on how mechanical cc is chosen and used should be considered. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: https://ekmeduniwien.at/core/catalog/2013/ (EK-Nr:1221/2013).

Strategic target temperature management in myocardial infarction--a feasibility trial.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to demonstrate the feasibility of a combined cooling strategy started out of hospital as an adjunctive to percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in the treatment of ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome (STE-ACS). DESIGN: Non-randomised, single-centre feasibility trial. SETTING: Department of emergency medicine of a tertiary-care facility, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria. In cooperation with the Municipal ambulance service of the city of Vienna. PATIENTS: Consecutive patients with STE-ACS presenting to the emergency medical service within 6 h after symptom onset. INTERVENTIONS: Cooling was initiated with surface cooling pads in the out-of-hospital setting, followed by the administration of 1000-2000 mL of cold saline at hospital arrival and completed by endovascular cooling in the catheterisation laboratory. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Feasibility of lowering core temperature below 35.0°C prior to immediately performed revascularisation. Safety and tolerability of the cooling procedure. RESULTS: In enrolled 19 patients (one woman, median age 51 years (IQR 45-59)), symptom onset to first medical contact (FMC) was 45 min (IQR 31-85). A core temperature below 35.0°C at reperfusion of the culprit lesion was achieved in 11 patients (78%) within 100 min (IQR 90-111) after FMC without any cooling-related serious adverse event. Temperature could be lowered from baseline 36.4°C (IQR 36.2-36.5°C) to 34.4°C (IQR 34.1-35.0°C) at the time of reperfusion. CONCLUSIONS: With limitations an immediate out-of-hospital therapeutic hypothermia strategy was feasible and safe in patients with STE-ACS undergoing primary PCI. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01864343; clinical trials unique identifier: NCT01864343.