Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
1.
Schizophr Res ; 113(2-3): 210-7, 2009 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19560901

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: To assess criteria and to identify predictive factors for functional outcome. The criteria should cover all domains proposed by the Remission in Schizophrenia Working Group. METHOD: PANSS ratings were used to evaluate the symptomatic treatment outcome of 262 inpatients with schizophrenia spectrum disorders within a naturalistic multicenter trial. Functional remission was defined as a GAF score >61 (Global Assessment of Functioning Scale), SOFAS score >61 (Social and Occupational Functioning Scale) and a SF-36 mental health subscore >40 (Medical Outcomes Study-Short Form Health Survey). Multivariate logistic regression and CART analyses were used to determine valid clinical and sociodemographic predictors. RESULTS: In total, 52 patients (20%) fulfilled the criteria for functional remission, 125 patients (48%) achieved symptomatic resolution and when criteria for functional remission and symptomatic resolution were combined 33 patients (13%) achieved complete remission. Younger age, employment, a shorter duration of illness, a shorter length of current episode, less suicidality, and a lower PANSS negative and global subscore at admission were predictive of functional remission. The regression model showed a predictive value of more than 80%. CONCLUSIONS: A significant association was found between functional remission and symptomatic resolution, indicating reasonable validity of the proposed definition for functional outcome. The revealed predictors for functional treatment outcome emphasize the need for psychosocial and vocational rehabilitation in schizophrenic patients.


Subject(s)
Psychotic Disorders/diagnosis , Schizophrenia/drug therapy , Schizophrenic Psychology , Adult , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neuropsychological Tests , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Predictive Value of Tests , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales , ROC Curve , Recurrence , Regression Analysis , Retrospective Studies , Severity of Illness Index , Young Adult
2.
Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci ; 259(5): 278-83, 2009 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19224108

ABSTRACT

Subtle structural brain abnormalities are an established finding in first-episode psychosis. Nevertheless their relationship to the clinical course of schizophrenia is controversially discussed. In a multicentre study 45 first-episode schizophrenia patients (FE-SZ) underwent standardized MRI scanning and were followed up to 1 year. In 32 FE-SZ volumetric measurement of three regions of interests (ROIs) potentially associated with disease course, hippocampus, lateral ventricle and the anterior limb of the internal capsule (ALIC) could be performed. The subgroups of FE-SZ with good (12 patients) and poor outcome (11 patients), defined by a clinically relevant change of the PANSS score, were compared with regard to these volumetric measures. Multivariate analysis of covariance revealed a significant reduced maximal cross sectional area of the left ALIC in FE-SZ with clinically relevant deterioration compared to those with stable psychopathology. There were no differences in the other selected ROIs between the two subgroups. In conclusion, reduced maximal area of ALIC, which can be interpreted as a disturbance of fronto-thalamic connectivity, is associated with poor outcome during the 1 year course of first-episode schizophrenia.


Subject(s)
Hippocampus/pathology , Internal Capsule/pathology , Lateral Ventricles/pathology , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Schizophrenia/pathology , Adolescent , Adult , Antipsychotic Agents/therapeutic use , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Haloperidol/therapeutic use , Humans , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Male , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales , Risperidone/therapeutic use , Schizophrenia/drug therapy , Severity of Illness Index , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
3.
World J Biol Psychiatry ; 10(4 Pt 2): 426-34, 2009.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17853260

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Standardized consensus criteria for remission in schizophrenia were recently proposed. The present study applied the symptom-severity component of these criteria to a sample of inpatients in order to determine the rates of remission during inpatient treatment and to explore predictors of remission. METHOD: A total of 288 inpatients from a multi-centre follow-up programme who fulfilled ICD-10 criteria for schizophrenia were included in the present analyses. PANSS ratings at admission and at discharge from hospitalization were used to examine remission status. Clinical and sociodemographic variables at admission were tested for their ability to predict remission at discharge. RESULTS: In total, 55% of the sample achieved symptom remission during inpatient treatment; 84% percent showed remission with respect to 'reality distortion', 85% with respect to 'disorganization' and only 65% with respect to 'negative symptoms'. Logistic regression analysis revealed that the global functioning (GAF) in the year before admission, the total score of the Strauss-Carpenter Prognostic Scale and the PANSS negative subscore at admission were predictive for symptom remission. The regression model showed a predictive value of about 70% and explained 36% of the observed variance. CONCLUSION: The results highlight the impact of negative symptoms for the course and treatment response of schizophrenic illness.


Subject(s)
Hospitalization , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales , Schizophrenia/therapy , Schizophrenic Psychology , Adult , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Germany , Humans , International Classification of Diseases , Interview, Psychological , Male , Middle Aged , Models, Statistical , Prognosis , ROC Curve , Schizophrenia/diagnosis , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
4.
J Clin Psychiatry ; 68(11): 1763-74, 2007 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18052570

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs) have proven superior to first-generation antipsychotics regarding relapse prevention, mainly in multiple-episode patients. Practice guidelines recommend SGAs as first-line treatment particularly in first-episode patients, although evidence for this group is still limited. Accordingly, the hypothesis of whether 1-year relapse rate in first-episode schizophrenia under maintenance treatment with risperidone is lower compared to haloperidol in low dose was tested. METHOD: Between November 2000 and May 2004, 1372 patients had been screened for eligibility in the inpatient facilities of 13 German psychiatric university hospitals. 159 remitted patients were enrolled after treatment of an acute first episode of schizophrenia according to ICD-10 F20 criteria. In the randomized controlled trial, double-blind antipsychotic treatment with risperidone or haloperidol was maintained in a targeted dose of 2 to 4 mg/day for 1 year. 151 patients were eligible for analysis. For 127 patients, this was a continuation trial after 8 weeks of randomized, double-blind, acute treatment with the same drugs; 24 patients were additionally randomly assigned after open acute treatment. RESULTS: With both antipsychotics (risperidone, N = 77; haloperidol, N = 74), no relapse evolved. Additionally, according to 2 post hoc defined measures of "marked clinical deterioration," significant differences occurred neither in the 2 respective deterioration rates (risperidone = 9%/23%; haloperidol = 8%/22%) nor in time until deterioration. Both antipsychotics were equally effective regarding significant symptom reduction and improvement in quality of life. Extrapyramidal symptoms were slightly higher with haloperidol. The overall dropout rate of 68%, however, was not significantly different between the 2 drug groups. CONCLUSION: Against the background of an overall favorable outcome, the hypothesized difference between risperidone and low-dose haloperidol regarding relapse prevention could not be supported for this sample of patients with first-episode schizophrenia. Possible design-related reasons for this finding are discussed. With regard to the high dropout rate, special programs are needed to keep schizophrenia patients who are in their early acute and postacute illness course in effective and safe treatment. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00159081.


Subject(s)
Antipsychotic Agents/therapeutic use , Biomedical Research , Cooperative Behavior , Haloperidol/therapeutic use , Risperidone/therapeutic use , Schizophrenia/drug therapy , Schizophrenic Psychology , Acute Disease , Adult , Algorithms , Antipsychotic Agents/administration & dosage , Antipsychotic Agents/adverse effects , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Double-Blind Method , Drug Administration Schedule , Female , Germany , Haloperidol/administration & dosage , Haloperidol/adverse effects , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Quality of Life/psychology , Risperidone/administration & dosage , Risperidone/adverse effects , Secondary Prevention , Surveys and Questionnaires
5.
Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci ; 254(2): 129-40, 2004 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15146342

ABSTRACT

In first-episode schizophrenia the advantage of new atypical neuroleptics compared to low-dose haloperidol as well as the indicated duration of neuroleptic maintenance treatment has still to be based on empirical evidence. Accordingly, a multi-center study on the optimization of acute and long-term treatment in first-episode schizophrenia is currently being carried out as part of the German Research Network on Schizophrenia. This paper reports on the design, methods and preliminary results of the two-year randomized double-blind study comparing risperidone and low-dose haloperidol within the framework of psychological interventions. In the second treatment year, relapse rates under continued neuroleptic treatment are compared with those under stepwise drug withdrawal substituting instead prodrome-based early intervention (intermittent treatment). As to the results, by November 2003 142 first episode patients (ICD-10 F20) have been included in the long-term study. One-year relapse rates were very low (3.8 %). On average, symptoms as well as drug side-effects decreased steadily under maintenance treatment. Although compliance on average was high, about 60% of the patients dropped out during the first study year. More pronounced psychopathology, (neurological) side-effects, lower compliance at study entry and absence of psychological treatment seemed to enhance the risk for drop-out. In conclusion, treatment in first episode schizophrenia is effective under both (further on blinded) neuroleptics; however these patients are at high risk for treatment drop-out. This emphasizes the need for a special support program.


Subject(s)
Antipsychotic Agents/therapeutic use , Schizophrenia/drug therapy , Adolescent , Adult , Antipsychotic Agents/adverse effects , Double-Blind Method , Dyskinesia, Drug-Induced/complications , Dyskinesia, Drug-Induced/epidemiology , Female , Germany/epidemiology , Humans , Long-Term Care , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Acceptance of Health Care , Patient Compliance , Patient Dropouts , Prospective Studies , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales , Recurrence , Risperidone/therapeutic use , Schizophrenia/epidemiology , Schizophrenic Psychology , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...