Phase Ib trial combining capecitabine, erlotinib and bevacizumab in pancreatic adenocarcinoma - REBECA trial.

Background Purpose of this phase Ib trial was to establish the maximum tolerable dose (MTD) of capecitabine and to escalate the dosages of erlotinib and bevacizumab to determine the recommended phase II dose (RP2D) in patients with advanced/metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma not pretreated for metastatic disease. Methods Starting doses were capecitabine 500 mg/m2 bid orally continuously, erlotinib 100 mg orally daily, and bevacizumab 5 mg/kg intravenously q 2 weeks. Dose escalation was performed according to a 3 + 3 design for capecitabine until MTD, for erlotinib and bevacizumab until the maximum doses registered by applying a substance-related, toxicity-based scheme accompanied by pharmacokinetic analysis. Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) were determined pretherapeutically by immunohistochemical identification after enrichment with immunomagnetic separation. Results Thirty patients were evaluable at six dose levels. 900 mg/m2 bid were determined as MTD for capecitabine based on dose-limiting toxicities: cutaneous in two patients and vascular in another. The most severe (Grade (G)3/4) drug-related treatment-emergent adverse events (toxicities) belonged to the categories gastrointestinal, vascular, cutaneous, cardiovascular, metabolic/nutritional or hematological. G3 toxicities occurred in 14 (47%), G3 + G4 in a single (3%) patient. 2 out of 28 patients (7%) exerted partial response, 17 (61%) stable disease. Pharmacokinetic evaluation revealed lack of drug-drug interaction between capecitabine and erlotinib and their metabolites. Presence of CTCs was associated with shorter progression-free survival (p = 0.009). Conclusions The study met the primary objective. RP2D was capecitabine 800 mg/m2 bid continuously, erlotinib 150 mg daily, and bevacizumab 10 mg/kg q 2 weeks. The regimen could be applied safely, but demonstrated limited efficacy.

Monitoring of erlotinib in pancreatic cancer patients during long-time administration and comparison to a physiologically based pharmacokinetic model.

PURPOSE: In this study, a therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of erlotinib in pancreatic cancer patients was performed over 50 weeks to reveal possible alterations in erlotinib plasma concentrations. Additionally, a physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model was created to assess such variations in silico. METHODS: Patients with advanced pancreatic cancer received a chemotherapeutic combination of 100 mg erlotinib q.d., 500-900 mg capecitabine b.d. and 5 mg/kg bevacizumab q.2wks. Samples were analyzed by HPLC and the results were compared to a PBPK model, built with the software GastroPlus™ and based on calculated and literature data. RESULTS: The erlotinib plasma concentrations did not show any accumulation, but displayed a high inter-patient variability over the whole investigated period. Trough plasma concentrations ranged from 0.04 to 1.22 µg/ml after day 1 and from 0.01 to 2.4 µg/ml in the long-term assessment. 7% of the patients showed concentrations below the necessary activity threshold of 0.5 µg/ml during the first week. The impact of some co-variates on the pharmacokinetic parameters Cmax and AUC0-24 were shown in a PBPK model, including food effects, changes in body weight, protein binding or liver function and the concomitant intake of gastric acid reducing agents (ARAs). CONCLUSION: This study presents the approach of combining TDM and PBPK modeling for erlotinib, a drug with a high interaction potential. TDM is an important method to monitor drugs with increased inter-patient variability, additionally, the PBPK model contributed valuable insights to the interaction mechanisms involved, resulting in an effective combination from a PK perspective to ensure a safe treatment.

Assessment of Pharmacokinetic Interaction Between Capecitabine and Cetuximab in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients.

AIM: This study focuses on the plasma disposition and metabolic activation of capecitabine (CCB) when administered alone or when combined with cetuximab (CTX). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-four chemo-naïve patients with KRAS wild-type colorectal cancer were randomized into two arms and received either CCB alone (1,000 mg/m(2) bid p.o.), followed by CCB plus CTX (loading dose (LD)=400 mg/m(2) followed by 250 mg/m(2) weekly i.v. maintenance dose) (Arm A; n=12 patients (patients)) or CCB plus CTX followed by CCB alone (Arm B; n=12 patients). Plasma samples were collected from the cubital vein and CCB, 5'-desoxy-5-fluorocytidine (5'-DFCR) and 5'-desoxy-5 fluorouridine (5'-DFUR) were quantified by a sensitive, selective reversed phase high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) assay. Non-compartment pharmacokinetic parameters have been calculated by Phoenix WinNonlin. RESULTS: No clinically relevant impact of CTX on CCB pharmacokinetic parameters and metabolic conversion could be detected in both arms after statistical evaluation (ANOVA). CONCLUSION: From the pharmacokinetic point of view, co-administration of CTX to CCB seems to be safe.

A simple method for comparing enzymatic capecitabine activation in various mono- and combination chemotherapies.

Before being able to develop a pharmacodynamic effect, a number of drugs have to be activated by enzymes, which are known to be potentially influenced by manifold factors, leading to a possible alteration of their activity behaviour. Based on capecitabine, we report a simple and rapid method for the estimation and comparison of the so-called 'apparent enzyme activity' (R), not only intra- (different dose levels) but also inter-schedule, to contribute to therapeutic success. Dividing the area under the curve (AUC) of the product by the AUC of the precursor generates a factor which indicates the apparent activity of the enzyme involved in the biotransformation of a compound. Our own data as well as data from the literature was used to calculate those R levels revealing that the formation of 5'-DFUR - the immediate precursor of 5-fluorouracil - was not affected by concomitant medication within the dosing range investigated. Calculated hypothetical means of R for carboxylesterase (1.49 ± 0.66) and for cytidine deaminase (1.17 ± 0.65) were obtained. Additionally, it is important to note that the method described in this report is of general use and not limited to chemotherapeutic agents, as soon as enzymes are involved in drug activation.

Clinical pharmacokinetics of capecitabine and its metabolites in combination with the monoclonal antibody bevacizumab.

AIM: Capecitabine, designed as a pro-drug to the cytotoxic agent 5-fluorouracil, is widely used in the management of colorectal cancer. This study was designed to investigate whether co-administration of the monoclonal antibody bevacizumab (BVZ) shows potential to modulate the plasma disposition of capecitabine (CCB) and its metabolites. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Nine patients treated with CCB and BVZ for advanced colorectal cancer entered this pharmacokinetic study. In the first cycle CCB was given alone at doses of 1,250 mg/m2 bi-daily for two weeks with one week rest. In the second cycle BVZ co-administration started simultaneously with oral intake of CCB by short infusion of 7.5 mg/kg. RESULTS: Mean plasma concentration time curves of CCB and its metabolites were insignificantly lower in the BVZ combination regimen compared to CCB monotherapy. After repeated cycles of BVZ no significant pharmacokinetic interaction was observed. CONCLUSION: From the pharmacokinetic point of view and in agreement with numerous clinical study data, co-administration of BVZ with CCB appears to be safe and efficient.

Validation of a simple assay for the quantification of the capecitabine metabolites 5'-DFCR and 5'-DFUR for drug monitoring in patients receiving outpatient chemotherapy.

A simple and precise analytical method for the determination of 5'deoxy-5-fluorocytidine (DFCR) and 5'deoxy-5-fluorouridine (DFUR), the enzymatically formed metabolites of capecitabine in plasma, was developed using a reversed-phase high performance liquid chromatography gradient method with external standard method. Blood samples were analyzed after separation of DFCR/DFUR by solid-phase extraction from matrix compounds using a C16 amide reversed-phase column operated at a flow rate of 0.8 ml/min in gradient elution mode with a mobile phase composed of water-methanol (10 mM ammonium acetate in water; m/v). Excellent recoveries in plasma ranging from 77.5-99.12% for DFCR and 84.70-99.15% for DFUR, respectively, were obtained. For both compounds the calibration curves were linear over the range from 0.156 to 5.0 µg/ml. The present assay is robust, selective and sensitive, and is being applied in our laboratories to monitor plasma concentrations of DFCR and DFUR in clinical phase I and phase II studies.