Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Infect Dis Now ; 53(7): 104750, 2023 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37406989

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to assess Long COVID sexual dysfunction among both sexes. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A cross-sectional study at a multidisciplinary COVID clinic. Consecutive patients answered a symptom-based questionnaire, which included sexual dysfunction. Individuals reporting any degree of sexual dysfunction were compared with those who denied. A multivariable logistic regression was conducted to identify risk factors. A principal component analysis was implemented to explore other symptoms associated with sexual dysfunction. RESULTS: All in all, 391 individuals recovering from COVID-19 completed the questionnaire, 211 women and 180 men. Mean age was 45.2 (SD 15.4) years. Most (280, 85.9%) had mild COVID-19, assessed at a median of 3.8 (IQR 2.0) months from diagnosis. Sexual dysfunction was reported by 55 (36%) of the men and 48 (28%) of the women. Increased age [per year; men OR 1.05 (95% CI 1.02-1.08)], long COVID cough [men 2.58 (1.05-6.32)], chest pain [women 3.54 (1.28-9.80)], irritability [women 3.45 (1.28-9.29)], paresthesia [men 4.23 (1.55-10.44); women 3.08 (1.14-8.32)], and emotional distress [men 3.26 (1.36-7.82); women 4.29 (1.65-11.18)] were significantly associated with sexual dysfunction. In women, sexual dysfunction was part of the emotional pattern, while among men, it was part of the emotional and pulmonary patterns. CONCLUSION: Sexual dysfunction is a common manifestation of long COVID in both men and women. Presence of other long COVID symptoms, and older age, are associated with this phenomenon. Further studies should explore the mechanisms for long COVID sexual dysfunction in both men and women, as well as strategies for prevention and treatment.

2.
Eur J Intern Med ; 93: 50-56, 2021 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34420847

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: 18F-Fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG) positron emission tomography, with contrast enhanced CT (PET-CT), is recommended as a first or a second-line imaging method for the evaluation of patients with fever of unknown origin (FUO). We evaluated the yield of PET-CT vs. contrast enhanced CT (alone) for the diagnosis of classical FUO. METHODS: A single center, 8-year retrospective cohort study. All hospitalized patients who underwent PET-CT for the investigation of classical FUO between 1/2012-1/2020 were included. The final diagnosis, based on clinical, microbiological, radiological and pathological data available at the latest follow-up, at least six months after discharge, was determined. For each case, we determined whether the diagnosis would have been reached based on the CT scan alone, or based on the PET-CT (thus, defining PET-CT as necessary). We compared the overall sensitivity and specificity results for both PET-CT and CT scan. Variables that were found to be significantly associated with PET-CT necessity on univariable analysis were entered into a multivariable logistic regression analysis. The results of the regression model were reported in odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULT: A total of 303 patients with classical FUO were referred for PET-CT. The final diagnoses included infectious diseases in 111/303 patients (36.5%), malignancies in 56/303 patients (18.4%) and non-infectious inflammatory conditions in 52/303 patients (17.1%). FUO resolved without diagnosis in 84/303 patients (28%). The overall sensitivity and specificity of the PET-CT scans were 88.7% and 80.9%, respectively, and for the CT scans were 75.2% and 90.2%, respectively. PET-CT had superior sensitivity vs CT (p=0.00) for all subgroups, with generally decreased specificity than CT for infections and inflammatory conditions. PET-CT was determined as necessary in 26% (79/303) of the patients. Endovascular infection, hematological malignancy and large vessel vasculitis were the only factors associated with PET-CT necessity on multivariable analysis. CONCLUSIONS: PET-CT offers superior sensitivity with slightly decreased specificity for the diagnosis of classical FUO compared to diagnostic CT. We recommend PET-CT as the imaging modality of choice for patients with classical FUO, when endovascular infection, hematological malignancy or large vessel vasculitis are suspected.


Subject(s)
Fever of Unknown Origin , Fluorodeoxyglucose F18 , Fever of Unknown Origin/diagnostic imaging , Humans , Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography , Retrospective Studies , Tomography, X-Ray Computed
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...