Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 62
Filter
1.
Clin Toxicol (Phila) ; 60(10): 1106-1112, 2022 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35950874

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Pesticide self-poisoning is a global clinical and public health problem. While self-poisoning with insecticides and herbicides has been extensively studied, there is minimal literature on acute fungicide self-poisoning. We aimed to study the clinical course and outcome of fungicide self-poisoned patients recruited to a prospective cohort in Sri Lanka. METHODS: We conducted a prospective study of patients presenting with fungicide self-poisoning to nine hospitals in Sri Lanka between 2002 and 2020. Patients were enrolled by clinical research assistants, with clinical outcomes being recorded at regular review for each patient. RESULTS: We identified 337 cases of self-poisoning with fungicides (alcohol as only co-ingestant), including 28 different fungicides across 5 different fungicide classes. Median time from ingestion to examination was 3.1 (1.8-5.7) h. Nearly all presented to hospital fully conscious (GCS 15, 15-15)- only 27 patients (8.0%) presented with reduced GCS (<15) and only 2 (0.6%) had GCS 3/15. Most patients (333/337, 98.8%) made a full recovery, of whom only eight (2.37%) required intubation and ventilation. Four patients died (case fatality rate: 1.2%; 95% CI 0.0-23.4) after ingestion of edifenphos (n = 2), propamocarb and pyraclostrobin. CONCLUSION: Fungicide self-poisoning appears to be less hazardous than insecticide or herbicide self-poisoning, with a substantially lower case fatality in the same cohort. Edifenphos is an exception to this 'less toxic' rule; as a WHO Class Ib highly hazardous pesticide, we recommend its withdrawal from, and replacement in, global agricultural practice. Propamocarb should be listed in the WHO hazard classification as propamocarb hydrochloride to reflect the higher toxicity of the common agricultural formulation. Pyraclostrobin currently has no WHO classification; one is urgently required now that its ingestion has now been linked the death of a patient. Additional prospective clinical data on fungicide self-poisoning is required to expand knowledge on the effects of these diverse compounds.


Subject(s)
Fungicides, Industrial , Herbicides , Insecticides , Pesticides , Poisoning , Humans , Prospective Studies , Sri Lanka/epidemiology
2.
Br J Clin Pharmacol ; 85(9): 2098-2107, 2019 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31173392

ABSTRACT

AIMS: We aim to calculate 2 metrics of relative lethal toxicity; the fatal toxicity index (FTI; number of deaths per year of a daily dose) and the case fatality (CF; number of deaths per overdose) with a focus on opioids, antidepressants, antipsychotics, benzodiazepines and illicit drugs. METHODS: This descriptive cohort study used the Australian National Coronial Information System (NCIS) to identify a population of individuals with drug-associated deaths in the Greater Newcastle Hunter Area between January 2002 and December 2016. This was combined with Australian medicine dispensing data and corresponding data from the Hunter Area Toxicology Service to calculate FTI and CF. RESULTS: There were 444 drug-related deaths and 21,296 overdoses during the study period. FTI and CF were well correlated (Spearman's rho 0.64, P < .001). Of the classes of interest, opioids had the highest FTI (40.3 95% confidence interval [CI] 35.2-45.4 deaths per 100 years of use at the defined daily dose or deaths/DDD/100 years) and CF (12.4% 95%CI 11.0-13.9). Fentanyl, methadone and morphine had the highest relative fatal toxicity within this class. Tricyclic antidepressants had the highest relative fatal toxicity of all antidepressants (FTI 14.5 95%CI 9.7-19.3 deaths/DDD/100 years and CF 7.1% [95%CI 4.8-9.3]) and benzodiazepines appeared to be more associated with multiple agent deaths than single. Of the illicit drugs, heroin had the highest CF (26.4%, 95%CI 19.1-33.7). CONCLUSION: Knowledge of relative lethal toxicity is useful to prescribers and medicines and public health policy makers in restricting access to more toxic drugs and may also assist coroners in determining cause of death.


Subject(s)
Drug Overdose/mortality , Illicit Drugs/toxicity , Prescription Drugs/toxicity , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Australia/epidemiology , Child , Child, Preschool , Cohort Studies , Datasets as Topic , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Drug Overdose/etiology , Female , Humans , Infant , Male , Middle Aged , Young Adult
3.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev ; 2: CD003328, 2018 02 23.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29473717

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Paracetamol (acetaminophen) is the most widely used non-prescription analgesic in the world. Paracetamol is commonly taken in overdose either deliberately or unintentionally. In high-income countries, paracetamol toxicity is a common cause of acute liver injury. There are various interventions to treat paracetamol poisoning, depending on the clinical status of the person. These interventions include inhibiting the absorption of paracetamol from the gastrointestinal tract (decontamination), removal of paracetamol from the vascular system, and antidotes to prevent the formation of, or to detoxify, metabolites. OBJECTIVES: To assess the benefits and harms of interventions for paracetamol overdosage irrespective of the cause of the overdose. SEARCH METHODS: We searched The Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group Controlled Trials Register (January 2017), CENTRAL (2016, Issue 11), MEDLINE (1946 to January 2017), Embase (1974 to January 2017), and Science Citation Index Expanded (1900 to January 2017). We also searched the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform and ClinicalTrials.gov database (US National Institute of Health) for any ongoing or completed trials (January 2017). We examined the reference lists of relevant papers identified by the search and other published reviews. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised clinical trials assessing benefits and harms of interventions in people who have ingested a paracetamol overdose. The interventions could have been gastric lavage, ipecacuanha, or activated charcoal, or various extracorporeal treatments, or antidotes. The interventions could have been compared with placebo, no intervention, or to each other in differing regimens. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently extracted data from the included trials. We used fixed-effect and random-effects Peto odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for analysis of the review outcomes. We used the Cochrane 'Risk of bias' tool to assess the risks of bias (i.e. systematic errors leading to overestimation of benefits and underestimation of harms). We used Trial Sequential Analysis to control risks of random errors (i.e. play of chance) and GRADE to assess the quality of the evidence and constructed 'Summary of findings' tables using GRADE software. MAIN RESULTS: We identified 11 randomised clinical trials (of which one acetylcysteine trial was abandoned due to low numbers recruited), assessing several different interventions in 700 participants. The variety of interventions studied included decontamination, extracorporeal measures, and antidotes to detoxify paracetamol's toxic metabolite; which included methionine, cysteamine, dimercaprol, or acetylcysteine. There were no randomised clinical trials of agents that inhibit cytochrome P-450 to decrease the activation of the toxic metabolite N-acetyl-p-benzoquinone imine.Of the 11 trials, only two had two common outcomes, and hence, we could only meta-analyse two comparisons. Each of the remaining comparisons included outcome data from one trial only and hence their results are presented as described in the trials. All trial analyses lack power to access efficacy. Furthermore, all the trials were at high risk of bias. Accordingly, the quality of evidence was low or very low for all comparisons. Interventions that prevent absorption, such as gastric lavage, ipecacuanha, or activated charcoal were compared with placebo or no intervention and with each other in one four-armed randomised clinical trial involving 60 participants with an uncertain randomisation procedure and hence very low quality. The trial presented results on lowering plasma paracetamol levels. Activated charcoal seemed to reduce the absorption of paracetamol, but the clinical benefits were unclear. Activated charcoal seemed to have the best risk:benefit ratio among gastric lavage, ipecacuanha, or supportive treatment if given within four hours of ingestion. There seemed to be no difference between gastric lavage and ipecacuanha, but gastric lavage and ipecacuanha seemed more effective than no treatment (very low quality of evidence). Extracorporeal interventions included charcoal haemoperfusion compared with conventional treatment (supportive care including gastric lavage, intravenous fluids, and fresh frozen plasma) in one trial with 16 participants. The mean cumulative amount of paracetamol removed was 1.4 g. One participant from the haemoperfusion group who had ingested 135 g of paracetamol, died. There were no deaths in the conventional treatment group. Accordingly, we found no benefit of charcoal haemoperfusion (very low quality of evidence). Acetylcysteine appeared superior to placebo and had fewer adverse effects when compared with dimercaprol or cysteamine. Acetylcysteine superiority to methionine was unproven. One small trial (low quality evidence) found that acetylcysteine may reduce mortality in people with fulminant hepatic failure (Peto OR 0.29, 95% CI 0.09 to 0.94). The most recent randomised clinical trials studied different acetylcysteine regimens, with the primary outcome being adverse events. It was unclear which acetylcysteine treatment protocol offered the best efficacy, as most trials were underpowered to look at this outcome. One trial showed that a modified 12-hour acetylcysteine regimen with a two-hour acetylcysteine 100 mg/kg bodyweight loading dose was associated with significantly fewer adverse reactions compared with the traditional three-bag 20.25-hour regimen (low quality of evidence). All Trial Sequential Analyses showed lack of sufficient power. Children were not included in the majority of trials. Hence, the evidence pertains only to adults. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: These results highlight the paucity of randomised clinical trials comparing different interventions for paracetamol overdose and their routes of administration and the low or very low level quality of the evidence that is available. Evidence from a single trial found activated charcoal seemed the best choice to reduce absorption of paracetamol. Acetylcysteine should be given to people at risk of toxicity including people presenting with liver failure. Further randomised clinical trials with low risk of bias and adequate number of participants are required to determine which regimen results in the fewest adverse effects with the best efficacy. Current management of paracetamol poisoning worldwide involves the administration of intravenous or oral acetylcysteine which is based mainly on observational studies. Results from these observational studies indicate that treatment with acetylcysteine seems to result in a decrease in morbidity and mortality, However, further evidence from randomised clinical trials comparing different treatments are needed.


Subject(s)
Acetaminophen/poisoning , Analgesics, Non-Narcotic/poisoning , Acetaminophen/pharmacokinetics , Acetylcysteine/therapeutic use , Analgesics, Non-Narcotic/pharmacokinetics , Antidotes/therapeutic use , Charcoal/therapeutic use , Cysteamine/therapeutic use , Dimercaprol/therapeutic use , Drug Overdose/mortality , Drug Overdose/therapy , Gastric Lavage , Humans , Intestinal Absorption , Liver Failure, Acute/chemically induced , Liver Failure, Acute/epidemiology , Liver Failure, Acute/surgery , Liver Transplantation , Methionine/therapeutic use , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
4.
Clin Toxicol (Phila) ; 55(2): 158, 2017 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27921461
5.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev ; (6): CD011428, 2015 Jun 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26058967

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Snake venom induced consumption coagulopathy is a major systemic effect of envenoming. Observational studies suggest that antivenom improves outcomes for venom induced consumption coagulopathy in some snakebites and not others. However, the effectiveness of snake antivenom in all cases of venom induced consumption coagulopathy is controversial. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effect of snake antivenom as a treatment for venom induced consumption coagulopathy in people with snake bite. SEARCH METHODS: The search was done on 30 January 2015. We searched the Cochrane Injuries Group's Specialised Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, The Cochrane Library), Ovid MEDLINE(R), Ovid MEDLINE(R) In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations, Ovid MEDLINE(R) Daily and Ovid OLDMEDLINE(R), Embase Classic+Embase (OvidSP), three other sources, clinical trials registers, and we also screened reference lists. SELECTION CRITERIA: All completed, published or unpublished, randomised, controlled trials with a placebo or no treatment arm, where snake antivenom was administered for venom induced consumption coagulopathy in humans with snake bites. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors reviewed the identified trials and independently applied the selection criteria. MAIN RESULTS: No studies met the inclusion criteria for this review. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Randomised placebo-controlled trials are required to investigate the effectiveness of snake antivenom for clinically relevant outcomes in patients with venom induced consumption coagulopathy resulting from snake bite. Although ethically difficult, the routine administration of a treatment that has a significant risk of anaphylaxis cannot continue without strong evidence of benefit.


Subject(s)
Antivenins/therapeutic use , Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation/therapy , Snake Venoms/poisoning , Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation/etiology , Humans
6.
Med J Aust ; 199(4): 257-60, 2013 Aug 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23984782

ABSTRACT

• The Therapeutic Goods Administration determined in November 2011 that dextropropoxyphene should be removed from the Australian Register of Therapeutic Goods. This is consistent with this drug's removal from the market in many other developed countries. • However, dextropropoxyphene is still on the market in Australia owing to a series of appeals made to the Administrative Appeals Tribunal (AAT) by the drug's manufacturer. • There is a difference between the standards by which the AAT judges the safety and efficacy of medicines and the standards used for registering therapeutic goods by regulatory agencies worldwide. • This raises the question as to whether the appeal process against TGA decisions appropriately serves the Australian public interest.


Subject(s)
Dextropropoxyphene/adverse effects , Government Regulation , Narcotics/adverse effects , Safety-Based Drug Withdrawals/legislation & jurisprudence , Substance Withdrawal Syndrome/prevention & control , Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems/legislation & jurisprudence , Australia , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Humans , Prescription Drugs/adverse effects , Substance Withdrawal Syndrome/epidemiology
7.
PLoS One ; 8(8): e71787, 2013.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23990989

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In developing countries, including Sri Lanka, a high proportion of acute poisoning and other medical emergencies are initially treated in rural peripheral hospitals. Patients are then usually transferred to referral hospitals for further treatment. Guidelines are often used to promote better patient care in these emergencies. We conducted a cluster randomized controlled trial (ISRCTN73983810) which aimed to assess the effect of a brief educational outreach ('academic detailing') intervention to promote the utilization of treatment guidelines for acute poisoning. METHODS AND FINDINGS: This cluster RCT was conducted in the North Central Province of Sri Lanka. All peripheral hospitals in the province were randomized to either intervention or control. All hospitals received a copy of the guidelines. The intervention hospitals received a brief out-reach academic detailing workshop which explained poisoning treatment guidelines and guideline promotional items designed to be used in daily care. Data were collected on all patients admitted due to poisoning for 12 months post-intervention in all study hospitals. Information collected included type of poison exposure, initial investigations, treatments and hospital outcome. Patients transferred from peripheral hospitals to referral hospitals had their clinical outcomes recorded. There were 23 intervention and 23 control hospitals. There were no significant differences in the patient characteristics, such as age, gender and the poisons ingested. The intervention hospitals showed a significant improvement in administration of activated charcoal [OR 2.95 (95% CI 1.28-6.80)]. There was no difference between hospitals in use of other decontamination methods. CONCLUSION: This study shows that an educational intervention consisting of brief out-reach academic detailing was effective in changing treatment behavior in rural Sri Lankan hospitals. The intervention was only effective for treatments with direct clinician involvement, such as administering activated charcoal. It was not successful for treatments usually administered by non-professional staff such as forced emesis for poisoning. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Controlled-Trials.com ISRCTN73983810 ISRCTN73983810.


Subject(s)
Hospitals, Rural , Personnel, Hospital/education , Poisoning/therapy , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Acute Disease , Antidotes/therapeutic use , Charcoal/therapeutic use , Cluster Analysis , Education, Continuing , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Outcome Assessment, Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Pralidoxime Compounds/therapeutic use , Sri Lanka
11.
Med J Aust ; 198(1): 43-7, 2013 Jan 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23330770

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To report the frequency and clinical outcomes of Amanita phalloides poisoning in the Australian Capital Territory and New South Wales, and the treatments used (including silibinin). DESIGN, SETTING AND PATIENTS: Retrospective case series of patients admitted to public hospitals in Canberra and Sydney for suspected A. phalloides poisoning between 1999 and 2012 (identified from hospital records and calls to the New South Wales Poisons Information Centre). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Frequency of poisoning and the clinical outcomes. RESULTS: Twelve patients presented with a history suggesting A. phalloides poisoning, 10 with probable poisoning and two with possible poisoning. Eight of those with probable poisoning developed significant hepatotoxicity and four died. Silibinin was administered to nine of those with probable poisoning (the other presented before 2005). Maintaining silibinin supply became a challenge during two clusters of poisoning. Eight of the patients with probable poisoning were not long-term residents of the ACT, and six were immigrants from Asia. CONCLUSIONS: The mortality rate due to A. phalloides poisoning in this case series was high despite treatment according to current standards, including use of silibinin, and the frequency of hepatotoxicity was more than double that for the previous decade. Ongoing public health campaigns are required.


Subject(s)
Antidotes/therapeutic use , Mushroom Poisoning/epidemiology , Silymarin/therapeutic use , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Amanita , Antidotes/supply & distribution , Australian Capital Territory/epidemiology , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Health Promotion , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Mushroom Poisoning/drug therapy , Mushroom Poisoning/mortality , New South Wales/epidemiology , Poison Control Centers/statistics & numerical data , Retrospective Studies , Silybin , Silymarin/supply & distribution , Young Adult
12.
PLoS One ; 7(11): e49405, 2012.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23185328

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Following acute organophosphorus (OP) poisoning patients complain of numbness without objective sensory abnormalities or other features of OP induced delayed polyneuropathy. The aim of this study was to measure peripheral nerve function after acute exposure to OP. METHODS: A cohort study was conducted with age, gender and occupation matched controls. Motor nerve conduction velocity (MNCV), amplitude and area of compound muscle action potential (CMAP), sensory nerve conduction velocity (SNCV), F- waves and electromyography (EMG) on the deltoid and the first dorsal interosseous muscles on the dominant side were performed, following acute OP poisoning. All neurophysiological assessments except EMG were performed on the controls. Assessments were performed on the day of discharge from the hospital (the first assessment) and six weeks (the second assessment) after the exposure. The controls were assessed only once. RESULTS: There were 70 patients (50 males) and 70 controls. Fifty-three patients attended for the second assessment. In the first assessment MNCV of all the motor nerves examined, CMAP amplitude and SNCV of ulnar nerve, median and ulnar F-wave occurrence in the patients were significantly reduced compared to the controls. In the second assessment significant reduction was found in SNCV of both sensory nerves examined, MNCV of ulnar nerve, CMAP amplitude of common peroneal nerve, F-wave occurrence of median and ulnar nerves. No abnormalities were detected in the patients when compared to the standard cut-off values of nerve conduction studies except F-wave occurrence. EMG studies did not show any abnormality. CONCLUSION: There was no strong evidence of irreversible peripheral nerve damage following acute OP poisoning, however further studies are required.


Subject(s)
Organophosphate Poisoning/physiopathology , Peripheral Nerves/physiopathology , Acute Disease , Adult , Case-Control Studies , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Linear Models , Male , Motor Neurons/physiology , Neural Conduction , Pesticides/poisoning , Statistics, Nonparametric
13.
BMC Public Health ; 12: 593, 2012 Aug 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22852867

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Acute poisoning is a major public health issue in many parts of the world. The epidemiology and the mortality rate is higher in low and middle income countries, including Sri Lanka. The aim of this study was to provide details about the epidemiology of acute poisoning in a rural Sri Lankan district and to identify the changing patterns and epidemiology of poisoning. METHODS: A prospective study was conducted from September 2008 to January 2010 in all hospitals with inpatient facilities in Anuradhapura district of North Central Province of Sri Lanka. Acute poisoning data was extracted from patient charts. Selected data were compared to the data collected from a 2005 study in 28 hospitals. RESULTS: There were 3813 poisoned patients admitted to the hospitals in the Anuradhapura district over 17 months. The annual population incidence was 447 poisoning cases per 100,000 population. The total number of male and female patients was approximately similar, but the age distribution differed by gender. There was a very high incidence of poisoning in females aged 15-19, with an estimated cumulative incidence of 6% over these five years. Although, pesticides are still the most common type of poison, medicinal drug poisonings are now 21% of the total and have increased 1.6 fold since 2005. CONCLUSIONS: Acute poisoning remains a major public health problem in rural Sri Lanka and pesticide poisoning remains the most important poison. However, cases of medicinal drug poisoning have recently dramatically increased. Youth in these rural communities remain very vulnerable to acute poisoning and the problem is so common that school-based primary prevention programs may be worthwhile.Lalith Senarathna, Shaluka F Jayamanna, Patrick J Kelly, Nick A Buckley,michael J Dibley, Andrew H Dawson. These authors contributed equally to this work.


Subject(s)
Poisoning/epidemiology , Rural Population/statistics & numerical data , Self-Injurious Behavior/epidemiology , Adolescent , Adult , Age Distribution , Aged , Carbamates/poisoning , Child , Female , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Incidence , Male , Middle Aged , Organophosphate Poisoning , Pesticides/poisoning , Plants, Toxic/poisoning , Poisoning/mortality , Population Surveillance , Prescription Drugs/poisoning , Self-Injurious Behavior/mortality , Sex Distribution , Sri Lanka/epidemiology , Thevetia/poisoning
14.
Clin Toxicol (Phila) ; 50(3): 202-9, 2012 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22372788

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Pesticide self-poisoning causes one third of global suicides. Sri Lanka halved its suicide rate by banning WHO Class I organophosphorus (OP) insecticides and then endosulfan. However, poisoning with Class II toxicity OPs, particularly dimethoate and fenthion, remains a problem. We aimed to determine the effect and feasibility of a ban of the two insecticides in one Sri Lankan district. METHODS: Sale was banned in June 2003 in most of Polonnaruwa District, but not Anuradhapura District. Admissions with pesticide poisoning to the district general hospitals was prospectively recorded from 2002. RESULTS: Hospital admissions for dimethoate and fenthion poisoning fell by 43% after the ban in Polonnaruwa, while increasing by 23% in Anuradhapura. The pesticide case fatality fell from 14.4% to 9.0% in Polonnaruwa (odds ratio [OR] 0.59, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.41-0.84) and 11.3% to 10.6% in Anuradhapura (OR 0.93, 95%CI 0.70-1.25; p = 0.051). This reduction was not sustained, with case fatality in Polonnaruwa rising to 12.1% in 2006-2007. Further data analysis indicated that the fall in case fatality had actually been due to a coincidental reduction in case fatality for pesticide poisoning overall, in particular for paraquat poisoning. CONCLUSIONS: We found that the insecticides could be effectively banned from agricultural practice, as shown by the fall in hospital admissions, with few negative consequences. However, the ban had only a minor effect on pesticide poisoning deaths because it was too narrow. A study assessing the agricultural and health effects of a more comprehensive ban of highly toxic pesticides is necessary to determine the balance between increased costs of agriculture and reduced health care costs and fewer deaths.


Subject(s)
Agriculture/legislation & jurisprudence , Government Regulation , Health Policy/legislation & jurisprudence , Organophosphate Poisoning , Pesticides/poisoning , Poisoning/etiology , Commerce/legislation & jurisprudence , Hospitalization , Humans , Incidence , Organophosphorus Compounds/supply & distribution , Pesticides/supply & distribution , Poisoning/epidemiology , Poisoning/prevention & control , Sri Lanka/epidemiology
15.
Clin Toxicol (Phila) ; 50(4): 250-3, 2012 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22455356

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Respiratory failure in acute organophosphate (OP) poisoning can occur early and also relatively late in the clinical course, and the pathophysiology of respiratory failure at these different phases may have important clinical implications. Objective. To compare the electrophysiological findings in patients with early and late respiratory failure following acute OP poisoning. METHODS: A prospective observational case series of consenting symptomatic patients with acute OP poisoning were assessed with daily physical examinations and repetitive nerve stimulation (RNS) studies. RNS was done on right and left median and ulnar nerves at 1, 3, 10, 15, 20, and 30 Hz. Outcomes such as need for ventilation and development of intermediate syndrome (IMS) were noted. Early respiratory failure was defined as occurring within 24 hours of ingestion. RESULTS: Seventy-eight patients were recruited for the clinical and electrophysiological study and of those 59 (75.6%) patients had ingested chlorpyrifos. Seven patients developed respiratory failure within 24 hours of ingestion with overt muscarinic signs. They had no electrophysiological abnormalities at median and ulnar nerves before intubation. Three of them later developed "forme fruste" IMS. Five other patients developed late respiratory failure after 24 hours of ingestion, and all of them showed progressive RNS changes indicating severe IMS prior to intubation. CONCLUSION: The normal RNS in all patients developing early respiratory failure suggests that it is due to a central nervous system (CNS) and muscarinic effect. This emphasizes the need for early rapid atropinisation as a priority, combating the nicotinic effects being less urgent. This is in contrast with the late respiratory failure, which has been shown to be associated with neuromuscular dysfunction. Further studies are needed to quantify CNS and muscarinic dysfunction to assist in the development of better treatments for the severe and early OP poisoning.


Subject(s)
Organophosphate Poisoning , Receptors, Muscarinic/physiology , Receptors, Nicotinic/physiology , Respiratory Insufficiency/chemically induced , Acute Disease , Adolescent , Adult , Electric Stimulation , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Respiratory Insufficiency/physiopathology
16.
Clin Toxicol (Phila) ; 49(6): 448-51, 2011 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21824055

ABSTRACT

The number of drugs with boxed warnings and the detail in the box are much greater in the USA than Australia. US warnings are up to ten times longer and often include a great deal of detail and qualified advice. Australian warnings are usually just a few sentences long and the expected response unequivocal. Other details are relegated to the relevant section within the product information. The restriction of warnings such that they are succinct and used sparingly are explicitly highlighted in the guidelines for boxed warnings in Australia. In addition, the range of other risk management strategies used may be broader. Widespread prescription drug subsidies and mechanisms set up to implement the "Quality Use of Medicines" policy provide a complementary range of options. Withdrawal of registration, removal of subsidies for all or selected indications, changed product information and labels, consumer-targeted information, prescriber mail outs, education programmes, restriction to authorised prescribers, and changed pack size and packaging have all been applied at some time in response to safety concerns. The diversity of approaches around the world provides an opportunity for a systematic approach to look at the effects of boxed warnings on prescribing practices so that we might discover what works best. While there are many studies on the effect of warnings from the USA, there are few comparable studies done where different approaches are used. Further, it is not possible to easily examine the total number and purpose of boxed warnings via any government websites. If there were always explicit and potentially verifiable changes in practice as the stated goal for each boxed warning in each jurisdiction and a requirement that the effectiveness of the intervention was measured against these goals, then we might have the evidence base for better policy around boxed warnings.


Subject(s)
Drug Labeling/standards , Legislation, Drug , Australia , Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions , Guidelines as Topic , Humans , Patient Education as Topic , Risk Management , United States , United States Food and Drug Administration
17.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev ; (4): CD002041, 2011 Apr 13.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21491385

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Poisoning with carbon monoxide (CO) remains an important cause of accidental and intentional injury worldwide. Several unblinded non-randomized trials have suggested that the use of hyperbaric oxygen (HBO) prevents the development of neurological sequelae. This has led to the widespread use of HBO in the management of patients with carbon monoxide poisoning. OBJECTIVES: To examine randomised trials of the efficacy of hyperbaric oxygen (HBO) compared to normobaric oxygen (NBO) for the prevention of neurologic sequelae in patients with acute carbon monoxide poisoning. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the following electronic databases; Cochrane Injuries Group Specialised Register (searched June 2010), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library 2010, Issue 2), MEDLINE (Ovid SP) 1950 to June 2010, EMBASE (Ovid SP) 1980 to June 2010, ISI Web of Science: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED) 1970 to June 2010, ISI Web of Science: Conference Proceedings Citation Index-Science (CPCI-S) 1990 to June 2010. SELECTION CRITERIA: All randomised controlled trials of HBO compared to NBO, involving non-pregnant adults who are acutely poisoned with carbon monoxide (regardless of severity). DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors independently extracted from each trial information on: the number of randomised patients, types of participants, the dose and duration of the intervention, and the prevalence of neurologic symptoms at follow-up. MAIN RESULTS: Seven randomised controlled trials of varying quality were identified; one was excluded because it did not evaluate clinical outcomes. Of the six remaining trials involving 1361 participants, two found a beneficial effect of HBO for the reduction of neurologic sequelae at one month, while four others did not. One of these is an incomplete publication (an abstract of an interim analysis). Although pooled random effects meta-analysis does not suggest a significant benefit from HBOT (OR for neurological deficits 0.78, 95%CI 0.54 to 1.12), significant methodologic and statistical heterogeneity was apparent among the trials, and this result should be interpreted cautiously. Moreover, design or analysis flaws were evident in all trials. Importantly, the conclusions of one positive trial may have been influenced by failure to adjust for multiple hypothesis testing, while interpretation of the other positive trial is hampered by a high risk of bias introduced during the analysis including an apparent change in the primary outcome. Both were also stopped early 'for benefit', which is likely to have inflated the observed effect. In contrast three negative trials had low power to detect a benefit of HBO due to exclusion of severely poisoned patients in two and very poor follow-up in the other. One trial that was said to be finished around eight years ago has not reported the final analysis in any forum. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Existing randomised trials do not establish whether the administration of HBO to patients with carbon monoxide poisoning reduces the incidence of adverse neurologic outcomes. Additional research is needed to better define the role, if any, of HBO in the treatment of patients with carbon monoxide poisoning. This research question is ideally suited to a multi-center randomised controlled trial.


Subject(s)
Carbon Monoxide Poisoning/therapy , Hyperbaric Oxygenation , Carbon Monoxide Poisoning/complications , Humans , Nervous System Diseases/prevention & control , Oxygen Inhalation Therapy , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
18.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev ; (2): CD005085, 2011 Feb 16.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21328273

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Acute organophosphorus pesticide poisoning causes tens of thousands of deaths each year across the developing world. Standard treatment involves administration of intravenous atropine and oxime to reactivate inhibited acetylcholinesterase. The clinical usefulness of oximes, such as pralidoxime and obidoxime, has been challenged over the past 20 years by physicians in many parts of the world. OBJECTIVES: To quantify the effectiveness and safety of the administration of oximes in acute organophosphorus pesticide-poisoned patients. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched both English and Chinese databases: Cochrane Injuries Group Specialised Register, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library), MEDLINE (Ovid SP), EMBASE (Ovid SP), ISI Web of Science: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), ISI Web of Science: Conference Proceedings Citation Index-Science (CPCI-S) and the Chinese language databases CNKI and WANGFANG. All searches were run in September 2009. SELECTION CRITERIA: Articles that could possibly be RCTs were retrieved to determine if they were randomised. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: The published methodology of three RCTs was not clear. We contacted the principal authors of these, but did not obtain further information. MAIN RESULTS: Seven pralidoxime RCTs were found. Three RCTs including 366 patients studied pralidoxime vs placebo and four RCTs including 479 patients compared two or more different doses. These trials found quite disparate results with treatment effects ranging from benefit to harm. However, many studies did not take into account several issues important for outcomes. In particular, baseline characteristics were not balanced, oxime doses varied widely, there were substantial delays to treatment, and the type of organophosphate was not taken into account. Only one RCT compared the World Health Organization (WHO) recommended doses with placebo. This trial showed no clinical benefits and a trend towards harm in all sub-groups, despite clear evidence that these doses reactivated acetylcholinesterase in the blood. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Current evidence is insufficient to indicate whether oximes are harmful or beneficial. The WHO recommended regimen (30 mg/kg pralidoxime chloride bolus followed by 8 mg/kg/hr infusion) is not supported. Further RCTs are required to examine other strategies and regimens. There are many theoretical and practical reasons why oximes may not be useful, particularly for late presentations of dimethyl OP and those with a large excess of OP that simply re-inhibits reactivated enzymes. Future studies should screen for patient sub-groups that may benefit and may need flexible dosing strategies as clinical effectiveness and doses may depend on the type of OP.


Subject(s)
Antidotes/therapeutic use , Organophosphate Poisoning , Oximes/therapeutic use , Pesticides/poisoning , Cholinesterase Reactivators/therapeutic use , Humans , Poisoning/drug therapy , Pralidoxime Compounds/therapeutic use , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
19.
Toxicol Lett ; 202(1): 69-74, 2011 Apr 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21291964

ABSTRACT

An increase in creatinine > 3 µmol/L/h has been suggested to predict death in patients with paraquat self-poisoning and the value of other plasma biomarkers of acute kidney injury has not been assessed. The aim of this study was to validate the predictive value of serial creatinine concentrations and to study the utility of cystatin C and neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) as predictors of outcome in patients with acute paraquat poisoning. The rate of change of creatinine (dCr/dt) and cystatin C (dCyC/dt) concentrations were compared between survivors and deaths. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves were constructed to determine the best threshold for predicting death. Paraquat was detected in 20 patients and 7 of these died between 18 h and 20 days post-ingestion. The dCr/dt ROC curve had an area of 0.93 and the cut-off was > 4.3 µmol/L/h (sensitivity 100%, specificity 85%, likelihood ratio 7). The dCyC/dt ROC curve had an area of 0.97 and the cutoff was > 0.009 mg/L/h (sensitivity 100%, specificity 91%, likelihood ratio 11). NGAL did not separate survivors from deaths. Death due to acute paraquat poisoning is associated with changes in creatinine and cystatin concentrations. Further validation of these measurements is needed before they can be adopted in guiding intensive treatments.


Subject(s)
Creatinine/blood , Cystatin C/blood , Herbicides/poisoning , Lipocalins/blood , Paraquat/poisoning , Poisoning/blood , Proto-Oncogene Proteins/blood , Acute Kidney Injury/blood , Acute Kidney Injury/chemically induced , Acute Kidney Injury/diagnosis , Acute-Phase Proteins/standards , Biomarkers/blood , Creatinine/standards , Cystatin C/standards , Humans , Lipocalin-2 , Lipocalins/standards , Poisoning/diagnosis , Proto-Oncogene Proteins/standards , Suicide, Attempted
20.
Clin Toxicol (Phila) ; 49(1): 2-12, 2011 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21288146

ABSTRACT

CONTEXT: Despite a worldwide decline in barbiturate use, cases of acute poisoning with severe toxicity are still noted, particularly in developing countries. Severe poisonings often require prolonged admission to an intensive care unit, so enhanced elimination might be useful to hasten recovery. Information regarding the efficacy of these techniques for individual barbiturates is not available in standard textbooks. OBJECTIVE: To determine the evidence supporting the effect of enhanced elimination and its role in the management of acute barbiturate poisoning. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted using broad search criteria in three databases. All potentially relevant articles were obtained, and reference lists were manually reviewed. Ninety-four publications fulfilling inclusion criteria were located. Studies were classified as controlled or uncontrolled, and clinical and pharmacokinetic end points were manually extracted. If not directly stated, standard pharmacokinetic methods were used to calculate the clearance and efficiency of enhanced elimination techniques for each barbiturate and tabulated for direct comparison. PROSPECTIVE CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS: Two of the 94 publications were prospective controlled studies (only one stated that allocation was via blinded randomisation), and both assessed the effect of multiple-dose activated charcoal for acute phenobarbital poisoning. These studies demonstrated enhanced elimination with a decrease in elimination of half-life from approximately 80 to 40?h, but only one study reported clinical benefits. UNCONTROLLED SERIES AND SINGLE CASE REPORTS: Sufficient data to determine the clearance due to enhanced elimination were available in only 52 of these papers. Barbiturate clearances by enhanced elimination varied markedly among studies. While extracorporeal modalities appeared to increase the direct clearance of many barbiturates, there was insufficient information to confirm a clinical benefit. CONCLUSIONS: There is limited evidence to support the use of enhanced elimination in the treatment of poisoning with most barbiturates. There is no role for urine alkalinisation, while multiple-dose activated charcoal may be useful for most phenobarbital and possibly primidone poisonings. Extracorporeal techniques appear to enhance elimination, but the clinical benefits, relative to the potential complications and cost, are poorly defined. Extracorporeal techniques such as haemodialysis and haemoperfusion can be considered for patients with life-threatening barbiturate toxicity such as refractory hypotension.


Subject(s)
Barbiturates/pharmacokinetics , Barbiturates/poisoning , Acute Disease , Adult , Clinical Trials as Topic , Female , Humans , Pentobarbital/poisoning , Phenobarbital/poisoning , Poisoning/therapy
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...